* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
@ 2023-06-08 11:26 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-06-08 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman, Sekhar Nori,
Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 347 bytes --]
> I find it interesting somehow that you found a contribution by Andrew Davis (from 2023-05-15)
> more appropriate.
It got reviewed from someone else. Patches which get a review from
someone else get a priority boost. But don't be sad, because of this
patch, I noticed all your other (unreviewed!) patches and applied them.
That's good, right?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
2023-06-08 11:26 ` Wolfram Sang
(?)
@ 2023-06-08 11:48 ` Markus Elfring
2023-06-08 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2023-06-08 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman,
Sekhar Nori, Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
>> I find it interesting somehow that you found a contribution by Andrew Davis (from 2023-05-15)
>> more appropriate.
>
> It got reviewed from someone else. Patches which get a review from
> someone else get a priority boost.
Such an effect can occasionally be also nice.
Unfortunately, it seems that the patch quality was still improvable.
> But don't be sad, because of this
> patch, I noticed all your other (unreviewed!) patches and applied them.
I was informed that another selection of change possibilities was accepted.
> That's good, right?
Yes. - I hope so.
More positive feedback can be nice.
* How will the patch integration evolve further for suggestions which seem to be
still in waiting queues?
* How far back would you like to support the known development history
for discussed Linux software components?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
2023-06-08 11:48 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2023-06-08 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-06-08 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman, Sekhar Nori,
Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 510 bytes --]
> Unfortunately, it seems that the patch quality was still improvable.
It was not perfect but good enough.
> * How will the patch integration evolve further for suggestions which seem to be
> still in waiting queues?
Easy, it will evolve quite similar with the amount of review/reviewers.
> * How far back would you like to support the known development history
> for discussed Linux software components?
Dunno, if I got the question right, but I don't want to break existing
stuff. Why do you ask?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
@ 2023-06-08 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-06-08 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman, Sekhar Nori,
Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 510 bytes --]
> Unfortunately, it seems that the patch quality was still improvable.
It was not perfect but good enough.
> * How will the patch integration evolve further for suggestions which seem to be
> still in waiting queues?
Easy, it will evolve quite similar with the amount of review/reviewers.
> * How far back would you like to support the known development history
> for discussed Linux software components?
Dunno, if I got the question right, but I don't want to break existing
stuff. Why do you ask?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
2023-06-08 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang
(?)
@ 2023-06-08 19:03 ` Markus Elfring
2023-06-08 20:23 ` Wolfram Sang
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2023-06-08 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman,
Sekhar Nori, Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
>> * How far back would you like to support the known development history
>> for discussed Linux software components?
>
> Dunno, if I got the question right,
Another bit of clarification follows follows …
> but I don't want to break existing stuff.
I am trying also to avoid some breakage.
> Why do you ask?
If I look at patches which I contributed for the software area “I2C”,
I got the impression that further constructive feedback will be helpful also for
six change possibilities from days like the following.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?submitter=65077&state=*&archive=both
* 2017-10-25
* 2016-09-23
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
2023-06-08 19:03 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2023-06-08 20:23 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-06-08 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman, Sekhar Nori,
Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 316 bytes --]
> If I look at patches which I contributed for the software area “I2C”,
> I got the impression that further constructive feedback will be helpful also for
> six change possibilities from days like the following.
Yes, you are right. these patches need feedback. This is why I haven't
applied them yet.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
@ 2023-06-08 20:23 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-06-08 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman, Sekhar Nori,
Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 316 bytes --]
> If I look at patches which I contributed for the software area “I2C”,
> I got the impression that further constructive feedback will be helpful also for
> six change possibilities from days like the following.
Yes, you are right. these patches need feedback. This is why I haven't
applied them yet.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated
2023-06-08 11:26 ` Wolfram Sang
(?)
(?)
@ 2023-06-09 6:26 ` Markus Elfring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2023-06-09 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, linux-arm-kernel, Kevin Hilman,
Sekhar Nori, Bartosz Golaszewski, kernel-janitors, Andrew Davis
> But don't be sad, because of this patch,
I became curious also how collateral evolution will be continued.
> I noticed all your other (unreviewed!) patches and applied them.
You converted some update suggestions into special change combinations.
* i2c: Delete error messages for failed memory allocations
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20230609&id=6b3b21a8542fd2fb6ffc61bc13b9419f0c58ebad
* i2c: Improve size determinations
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20230609&id=06e989578232da33a7fe96b04191b862af8b2cec
> That's good, right?
I hope that development interests will grow accordingly.
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread