From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"daniel.machon@microchip.com" <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 06/10] ice: Flesh out implementation of support for SRIOV on bonded interface
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 09:23:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIbIATgSmqdPfWil@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW5PR11MB58110D453C6E6BB15AD4A53ADD51A@MW5PR11MB5811.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 04:32:27PM +0000, Ertman, David M wrote:
...
> > > + /* find parent in primary tree */
> > > + pi = hw->port_info;
> > > + tc_node = ice_sched_get_tc_node(pi, tc);
> > > + if (!tc_node) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "Failure to find TC node in failover tree\n");
> > > + goto resume_reclaim;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + aggnode = ice_sched_get_agg_node(pi, tc_node,
> > ICE_DFLT_AGG_ID);
> > > + if (!aggnode) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "Failure to find aggreagte node in failover
> > tree\n");
> > > + goto resume_reclaim;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + aggl = ice_sched_get_agg_layer(hw);
> > > + vsil = ice_sched_get_vsi_layer(hw);
> > > +
> > > + for (n = aggl + 1; n < vsil; n++)
> > > + num_nodes[n] = 1;
> > > +
> > > + for (n = 0; n < aggnode->num_children; n++) {
> > > + n_prt = ice_sched_get_free_vsi_parent(hw, aggnode-
> > >children[n],
> > > + num_nodes);
> > > + if (n_prt)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* if no free parent found - add one */
> > > + if (!n_prt) {
> >
> > Likewise, here too.
>
> Actually, this code was refactored out into a subfunction in patch 10/10 for
> this series. In the subfunction, n_prt is initialized to NULL (for purposes of
> using it as a return value. I need to move that refactoring back into this
> patch since there are multiple uses this far back. Thanks for pointing this
> one out to me!
>
> I will send this change out in patch set v4!
Thanks,
much appreciated.
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"daniel.machon@microchip.com" <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v3 06/10] ice: Flesh out implementation of support for SRIOV on bonded interface
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 09:23:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIbIATgSmqdPfWil@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW5PR11MB58110D453C6E6BB15AD4A53ADD51A@MW5PR11MB5811.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 04:32:27PM +0000, Ertman, David M wrote:
...
> > > + /* find parent in primary tree */
> > > + pi = hw->port_info;
> > > + tc_node = ice_sched_get_tc_node(pi, tc);
> > > + if (!tc_node) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "Failure to find TC node in failover tree\n");
> > > + goto resume_reclaim;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + aggnode = ice_sched_get_agg_node(pi, tc_node,
> > ICE_DFLT_AGG_ID);
> > > + if (!aggnode) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "Failure to find aggreagte node in failover
> > tree\n");
> > > + goto resume_reclaim;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + aggl = ice_sched_get_agg_layer(hw);
> > > + vsil = ice_sched_get_vsi_layer(hw);
> > > +
> > > + for (n = aggl + 1; n < vsil; n++)
> > > + num_nodes[n] = 1;
> > > +
> > > + for (n = 0; n < aggnode->num_children; n++) {
> > > + n_prt = ice_sched_get_free_vsi_parent(hw, aggnode-
> > >children[n],
> > > + num_nodes);
> > > + if (n_prt)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* if no free parent found - add one */
> > > + if (!n_prt) {
> >
> > Likewise, here too.
>
> Actually, this code was refactored out into a subfunction in patch 10/10 for
> this series. In the subfunction, n_prt is initialized to NULL (for purposes of
> using it as a return value. I need to move that refactoring back into this
> patch since there are multiple uses this far back. Thanks for pointing this
> one out to me!
>
> I will send this change out in patch set v4!
Thanks,
much appreciated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-08 18:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 00/10] Implement support for SRIOV + LAG Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 01/10] ice: Correctly initialize queue context values Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-09 10:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Daniel Machon
2023-06-09 10:45 ` Daniel Machon
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 02/10] ice: Add driver support for firmware changes for LAG Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 03/10] ice: changes to the interface with the HW and FW for SRIOV_VF+LAG Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-09 10:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Daniel Machon
2023-06-09 10:05 ` Daniel Machon
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 04/10] ice: implement lag netdev event handler Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-09 10:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Daniel Machon
2023-06-09 10:00 ` Daniel Machon
2023-06-09 16:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Ertman, David M
2023-06-09 16:34 ` Ertman, David M
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 05/10] ice: process events created by " Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 06/10] ice: Flesh out implementation of support for SRIOV on bonded interface Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-09 9:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2023-06-09 9:01 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-09 16:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Ertman, David M
2023-06-09 16:32 ` Ertman, David M
2023-06-12 7:23 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-06-12 7:23 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-09 10:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Daniel Machon
2023-06-09 10:40 ` Daniel Machon
2023-06-09 16:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Ertman, David M
2023-06-09 16:39 ` Ertman, David M
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 07/10] ice: support non-standard teardown of bond interface Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 08/10] ice: enforce interface eligibility and add messaging for SRIOV LAG Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 09/10] ice: enforce no DCB config changing when in bond Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 10/10] ice: update reset path for SRIOV LAG support Dave Ertman
2023-06-08 18:06 ` Dave Ertman
2023-06-09 10:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Daniel Machon
2023-06-09 10:42 ` Daniel Machon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZIbIATgSmqdPfWil@corigine.com \
--to=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.