All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/17] mm/slab: Decouple ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:13:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIhPaixb/0ve7zZo@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5faed13c-43f2-66ef-c42c-7d7bebb224d8@suse.cz>

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 6/12/23 17:31, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > In preparation for supporting a kmalloc() minimum alignment smaller than
> > the arch DMA alignment, decouple the two definitions. This requires that
> > either the kmalloc() caches are aligned to a (run-time) cache-line size
> > or the DMA API bounces unaligned kmalloc() allocations. Subsequent
> > patches will implement both options.
> > 
> > After this patch, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is expected to be used in static
> > alignment annotations and defined by an architecture to be the maximum
> > alignment for all supported configurations/SoCs in a single Image.
> > Architectures opting in to a smaller ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN will need to
> > define its value in the arch headers.
> > 
> > Since ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is now always defined, adjust the #ifdef in
> > dma_get_cache_alignment() so that there is no change for architectures
> > not requiring a minimum DMA alignment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > Tested-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Thanks for the ack.

It looks like moving the ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN definition to linux/cache.h
messes up powerpc32 -
https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306131053.1ybvRRhO-lkp@intel.com - possibly
a few other architecture that define this macro in a file other than
asm/cache.h (I only tested powerpc64 before posting).

At a quick grep, we have:

  arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h:34: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

This could be moved to asm/cache.h. It probably already relies on some
indirect includes.

  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/kmalloc.h:10: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       128
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/kmalloc.h:7: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       32
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/kmalloc.h:9: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       128
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-n64/kmalloc.h:6: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-tx49xx/kmalloc.h:5: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES

These are ok since kmalloc.h is included in asm/cache.h.

  arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_32.h:16: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

I'd move this macro to asm/cache.h on powerpc. asm/page_32.h already
includes asm/cache.h.

  arch/sh/include/asm/page.h:181: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

Same here. L1_CACHE_BYTES is defined in asm/cache.h but it's not
included in asm/page.h, so I guess it's relying on some indirect
includes.

I'll post three more patches to move the ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to
asm/cache.h for microblaze, powerpc and sh (once I finished build
testing).

-- 
Catalin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/17] mm/slab: Decouple ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:13:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIhPaixb/0ve7zZo@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5faed13c-43f2-66ef-c42c-7d7bebb224d8@suse.cz>

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 6/12/23 17:31, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > In preparation for supporting a kmalloc() minimum alignment smaller than
> > the arch DMA alignment, decouple the two definitions. This requires that
> > either the kmalloc() caches are aligned to a (run-time) cache-line size
> > or the DMA API bounces unaligned kmalloc() allocations. Subsequent
> > patches will implement both options.
> > 
> > After this patch, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is expected to be used in static
> > alignment annotations and defined by an architecture to be the maximum
> > alignment for all supported configurations/SoCs in a single Image.
> > Architectures opting in to a smaller ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN will need to
> > define its value in the arch headers.
> > 
> > Since ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is now always defined, adjust the #ifdef in
> > dma_get_cache_alignment() so that there is no change for architectures
> > not requiring a minimum DMA alignment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > Tested-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Thanks for the ack.

It looks like moving the ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN definition to linux/cache.h
messes up powerpc32 -
https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306131053.1ybvRRhO-lkp@intel.com - possibly
a few other architecture that define this macro in a file other than
asm/cache.h (I only tested powerpc64 before posting).

At a quick grep, we have:

  arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h:34: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

This could be moved to asm/cache.h. It probably already relies on some
indirect includes.

  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/kmalloc.h:10: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       128
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/kmalloc.h:7: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       32
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/kmalloc.h:9: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       128
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-n64/kmalloc.h:6: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-tx49xx/kmalloc.h:5: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES

These are ok since kmalloc.h is included in asm/cache.h.

  arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_32.h:16: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

I'd move this macro to asm/cache.h on powerpc. asm/page_32.h already
includes asm/cache.h.

  arch/sh/include/asm/page.h:181: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

Same here. L1_CACHE_BYTES is defined in asm/cache.h but it's not
included in asm/page.h, so I guess it's relying on some indirect
includes.

I'll post three more patches to move the ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to
asm/cache.h for microblaze, powerpc and sh (once I finished build
testing).

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-13 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-12 15:31 [PATCH v7 00/17] mm, dma, arm64: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8 Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] mm/slab: Decouple ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-13  9:46   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-13  9:46     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-13 11:13     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-06-13 11:13       ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] dma: Allow dma_get_cache_alignment() to be overridden by the arch code Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] mm/slab: Simplify create_kmalloc_cache() args and make it static Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] mm/slab: Limit kmalloc() minimum alignment to dma_get_cache_alignment() Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] drivers/base: Use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN instead of ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] drivers/gpu: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] drivers/usb: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] drivers/spi: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] dm-crypt: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] iio: core: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] arm64: Allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smaller cache_line_size() Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] scatterlist: Add dedicated config for DMA flags Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] dma-mapping: Name SG DMA flag helpers consistently Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] dma-mapping: Force bouncing if the kmalloc() size is not cache-line-aligned Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] iommu/dma: Force bouncing if the size is not cacheline-aligned Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] mm: slab: Reduce the kmalloc() minimum alignment if DMA bouncing possible Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] arm64: Enable ARCH_WANT_KMALLOC_DMA_BOUNCE for arm64 Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-05 13:40 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] mm, dma, arm64: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8 Amit Pundir
2023-07-05 13:40   ` Amit Pundir
2023-07-07  0:41   ` Isaac Manjarres
2023-07-07  0:41     ` Isaac Manjarres
2023-07-08 13:02     ` Amit Pundir
2023-07-08 13:02       ` Amit Pundir
2023-07-11 19:44       ` Isaac Manjarres
2023-07-11 19:44         ` Isaac Manjarres
2023-07-12  4:57         ` Amit Pundir
2023-07-12  4:57           ` Amit Pundir
2023-07-09  3:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-09  3:27     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-28 16:41 ` John Ernberg
2025-03-28 19:38   ` Frank Li
2025-03-31  8:02     ` John Ernberg
2025-03-31 16:21       ` Frank Li
2025-04-01 12:56         ` John Ernberg
2025-04-01 16:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-02 10:35     ` John Ernberg
2025-05-02 12:02     ` John Ernberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZIhPaixb/0ve7zZo@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.