* [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-06 15:25 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-06 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
make V=1 M=samples/bpf
The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
---
samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
# Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
# TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
$(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
$(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
$(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
- -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
+ -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
-I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
-c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
xdp_sample.bpf.o
LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
-BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
+BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
$(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
# $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
files
-ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
+ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
ifdef building_out_of_srctree
_tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
endif
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-06 15:25 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-06 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
make V=1 M=samples/bpf
The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
---
samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
# Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
# TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
$(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
$(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
$(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
- -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
+ -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
-I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
-c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
xdp_sample.bpf.o
LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
-BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
+BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
$(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
# $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
files
-ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
+ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
ifdef building_out_of_srctree
_tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
endif
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-06 15:25 ` Anh Tuan Phan
@ 2023-07-06 18:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2023-07-06 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>
> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>
> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>
> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> ---
> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
[..]
> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>
> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>
> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>
> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> files
[..]
> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> endif
> --
> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-06 18:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees @ 2023-07-06 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>
> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>
> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>
> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> ---
> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
[..]
> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>
> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>
> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>
> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> files
[..]
> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> endif
> --
> 2.34.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-06 18:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
@ 2023-07-07 1:10 ` Anh Tuan Phan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-07 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>
>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>
>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>
> [..]
>
>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>
> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
or should I remove this line?
>
>
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>
>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>
>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>
>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>> files
>
> [..]
>
>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>
> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>
>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> endif
>> --
>> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-07 1:10 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-07 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>
>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>
>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>
> [..]
>
>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>
> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
or should I remove this line?
>
>
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>
>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>
>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>
>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>> files
>
> [..]
>
>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>
> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>
>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> endif
>> --
>> 2.34.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-07 1:10 ` Anh Tuan Phan
@ 2023-07-07 16:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2023-07-07 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>
> >> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>
> >> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >
> > Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>
> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> or should I remove this line?
You might have these headers installed on your system already if
it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >
> >
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>
> >> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>
> >> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>
> >> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >> files
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >
> > This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> > form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >
> >> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >> endif
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-07 16:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees @ 2023-07-07 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>
> >> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>
> >> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >
> > Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>
> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> or should I remove this line?
You might have these headers installed on your system already if
it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >
> >
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>
> >> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>
> >> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>
> >> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >> files
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >
> > This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> > form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >
> >> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >> endif
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-06 18:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
@ 2023-07-09 5:12 ` Anh Tuan Phan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-09 5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
Adding one more discussion around your previous question that I missed.
On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>
>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>
>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>
> [..]
>
>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>
> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>
>
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>
>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>
>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>
>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>> files
>
> [..]
>
>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>
> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
Sorry for missing this question. As I understand KBUILD_EXTMOD
corresponding to external module. In my case, it's $M=samples/bpf. I
don't really know why it's needed here.
>
>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> endif
>> --
>> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-09 5:12 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-09 5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
Adding one more discussion around your previous question that I missed.
On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>
>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>
>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>
> [..]
>
>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>
> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>
>
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>
>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>
>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>
>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>> files
>
> [..]
>
>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>
> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
Sorry for missing this question. As I understand KBUILD_EXTMOD
corresponding to external module. In my case, it's $M=samples/bpf. I
don't really know why it's needed here.
>
>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> endif
>> --
>> 2.34.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-07 16:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
@ 2023-07-09 14:45 ` Anh Tuan Phan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-09 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>
>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>
>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>
>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>
>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>> or should I remove this line?
>
> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>
>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>
>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>
>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>> files
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>
>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>
>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>> endif
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
---
Change from the original patch
- Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
"-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
# Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
# TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
$(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
$(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
$(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
- -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
+ -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
-I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
-c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
xdp_sample.bpf.o
LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
-BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
+BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
$(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
# $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
files
-ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
+ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
ifdef building_out_of_srctree
_tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
endif
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-09 14:45 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-09 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>
>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>
>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>
>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>
>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>> or should I remove this line?
>
> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>
>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>
>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>
>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>> files
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>
>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>
>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>> endif
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
---
Change from the original patch
- Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
"-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
# Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
# TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
- -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
+ -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
$(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
$(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
$(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
@echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
$(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
- -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
+ -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
-I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
-I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
-c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
xdp_sample.bpf.o
LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
-BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
+BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
$(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
# $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
files
-ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
+ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
ifdef building_out_of_srctree
_tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
endif
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-09 14:45 ` Anh Tuan Phan
@ 2023-07-10 17:18 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2023-07-10 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
to the old one? Thx!
> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>>>
> >>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>
> >>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> >>
> >> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> >> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> >> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> >> or should I remove this line?
> >
> > You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> > it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> > s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>
> >>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>
> >>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>
> >>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>> files
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>
> >>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> >>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >>>
> >>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>> endif
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.34.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Change from the original patch
>
> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>
> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>
> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>
> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>
> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> files
[..]
> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> endif
This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-10 17:18 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees @ 2023-07-10 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
to the old one? Thx!
> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>>>
> >>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>
> >>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> >>
> >> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> >> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> >> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> >> or should I remove this line?
> >
> > You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> > it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> > s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>
> >>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>
> >>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>
> >>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>> files
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>
> >>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> >>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >>>
> >>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>> endif
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.34.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Change from the original patch
>
> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>
> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>
> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>
> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>
> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> files
[..]
> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> endif
This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-10 17:18 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
@ 2023-07-16 9:42 ` Anh Tuan Phan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-16 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
>
> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
> to the old one? Thx!
Will do in the next version.
>
>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
>>>>>
>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>>>
>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>>>> or should I remove this line?
>>>
>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>> files
>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
>>>>>
>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>
>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>>>
>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Change from the original patch
>>
>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>>
>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>
>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>
>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>
>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>> files
>
> [..]
>
>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> endif
>
> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
KBUILD_EXTMOD.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-16 9:42 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-16 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
>
> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
> to the old one? Thx!
Will do in the next version.
>
>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
>>>>>
>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>>>
>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>>>> or should I remove this line?
>>>
>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>> files
>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
>>>>>
>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>
>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>>>
>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Change from the original patch
>>
>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>>
>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>
>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>
>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>
>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>
>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>> files
>
> [..]
>
>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> endif
>
> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
KBUILD_EXTMOD.
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-16 9:42 ` Anh Tuan Phan
@ 2023-07-17 16:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2023-07-17 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
> >
> > In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
> > to the old one? Thx!
>
> Will do in the next version.
>
> >
> >> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [..]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> >>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> >>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> >>>> or should I remove this line?
> >>>
> >>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> >>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> >>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>>>> files
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [..]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> >>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>>>> endif
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 2.34.1
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Change from the original patch
> >>
> >> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
> >> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
> >>
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>
> >> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>
> >> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>
> >> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >> files
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >> endif
> >
> > This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
> > is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
> > IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
>
> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
to some of the $(obj)s?
I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
used in the other places.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-17 16:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees @ 2023-07-17 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
> >
> > In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
> > to the old one? Thx!
>
> Will do in the next version.
>
> >
> >> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [..]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> >>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> >>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> >>>> or should I remove this line?
> >>>
> >>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> >>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> >>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>>>> files
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [..]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> >>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>>>> endif
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 2.34.1
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Change from the original patch
> >>
> >> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
> >> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
> >>
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
> >> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>
> >> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>
> >> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>
> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>
> >> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >> files
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >> endif
> >
> > This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
> > is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
> > IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
>
> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
to some of the $(obj)s?
I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
used in the other places.
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-17 16:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
@ 2023-07-19 16:13 ` Anh Tuan Phan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-19 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/17/23 23:46, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
>>>
>>> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
>>> to the old one? Thx!
>>
>> Will do in the next version.
>>
>>>
>>>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>>>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>>>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>>>>>> or should I remove this line?
>>>>>
>>>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
>>>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
>>>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>>>> endif
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Change from the original patch
>>>>
>>>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
>>>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>>>>
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>
>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>
>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>
>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>> files
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>> endif
>>>
>>> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
>>> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
>>> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
>>
>> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
>> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
>> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
>
> My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
> Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
> to some of the $(obj)s?
> I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
> used in the other places.
It turns out that your guess is right. "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" is only
needed for the following objects: xdp_redirect_map_multi_user,
xdp_redirect_cpu_user, xdp_redirect_map_user, xdp_redirect_user,
xdp_monitor_user and xdp_router_ipv4_user. There is a variable to add
flags for gcc named $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) but it has not been
set. My proposed fix is to set the following variables:
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_multi_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_cpu_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_monitor_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_router_ipv4_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
It works with the original "ifeq
> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern. What do
you think about my proposed fix?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-19 16:13 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-19 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/17/23 23:46, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
>>>
>>> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
>>> to the old one? Thx!
>>
>> Will do in the next version.
>>
>>>
>>>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>>>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>>>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>>>>>> or should I remove this line?
>>>>>
>>>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
>>>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
>>>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>>>> endif
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Change from the original patch
>>>>
>>>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
>>>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>>>>
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>
>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>
>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>
>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>> files
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>> endif
>>>
>>> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
>>> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
>>> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
>>
>> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
>> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
>> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
>
> My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
> Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
> to some of the $(obj)s?
> I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
> used in the other places.
It turns out that your guess is right. "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" is only
needed for the following objects: xdp_redirect_map_multi_user,
xdp_redirect_cpu_user, xdp_redirect_map_user, xdp_redirect_user,
xdp_monitor_user and xdp_router_ipv4_user. There is a variable to add
flags for gcc named $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) but it has not been
set. My proposed fix is to set the following variables:
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_multi_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_cpu_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_monitor_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
+TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_router_ipv4_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
It works with the original "ifeq
> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern. What do
you think about my proposed fix?
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-19 16:13 ` Anh Tuan Phan
@ 2023-07-20 17:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2023-07-20 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 9:13 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/17/23 23:46, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
> >>>
> >>> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
> >>> to the old one? Thx!
> >>
> >> Will do in the next version.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >>>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >>>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >>>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> >>>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> >>>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> >>>>>> or should I remove this line?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> >>>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> >>>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>>>>>> files
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> >>>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>>>>>> endif
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> 2.34.1
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Change from the original patch
> >>>>
> >>>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
> >>>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
> >>>>
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>
> >>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>
> >>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>
> >>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>> files
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>> endif
> >>>
> >>> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
> >>> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
> >>> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
> >>
> >> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
> >> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
> >> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
> >
> > My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
> > Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
> > to some of the $(obj)s?
> > I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
> > ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
> > used in the other places.
>
> It turns out that your guess is right. "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" is only
> needed for the following objects: xdp_redirect_map_multi_user,
> xdp_redirect_cpu_user, xdp_redirect_map_user, xdp_redirect_user,
> xdp_monitor_user and xdp_router_ipv4_user. There is a variable to add
> flags for gcc named $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) but it has not been
> set. My proposed fix is to set the following variables:
Looks like these are the tests that use bpf skeleton.
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_multi_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_cpu_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_monitor_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_router_ipv4_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>
> It works with the original "ifeq
> > ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern. What do
> you think about my proposed fix?
Maybe we should just unconditionally add "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" to
_tprogc_flags ?
And then we can drop that whole part:
ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
ifdef building_out_of_srctree
_tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
endif
endif
IOW, replace that $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) part with -I
$(objtree)/$(obj) and call it a day?
I honestly have no clue why it's this complicated and I doubt anybody
at this point remembers...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-20 17:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees @ 2023-07-20 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anh Tuan Phan; +Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 9:13 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/17/23 23:46, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
> >>>
> >>> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
> >>> to the old one? Thx!
> >>
> >> Will do in the next version.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
> >>>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
> >>>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
> >>>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
> >>>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
> >>>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
> >>>>>> or should I remove this line?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
> >>>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
> >>>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>>>>>> files
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
> >>>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>>>>>> endif
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> 2.34.1
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Change from the original patch
> >>>>
> >>>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
> >>>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
> >>>>
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
> >>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
> >>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
> >>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
> >>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
> >>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> >>>>
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
> >>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
> >>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
> >>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
> >>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
> >>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
> >>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> >>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
> >>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
> >>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
> >>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
> >>>>
> >>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
> >>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
> >>>>
> >>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
> >>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
> >>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
> >>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
> >>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
> >>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
> >>>>
> >>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
> >>>> files
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> >>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> >>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >>>> endif
> >>>
> >>> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
> >>> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
> >>> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
> >>
> >> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
> >> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> >> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
> >> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
> >
> > My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
> > Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
> > to some of the $(obj)s?
> > I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
> > ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
> > used in the other places.
>
> It turns out that your guess is right. "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" is only
> needed for the following objects: xdp_redirect_map_multi_user,
> xdp_redirect_cpu_user, xdp_redirect_map_user, xdp_redirect_user,
> xdp_monitor_user and xdp_router_ipv4_user. There is a variable to add
> flags for gcc named $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) but it has not been
> set. My proposed fix is to set the following variables:
Looks like these are the tests that use bpf skeleton.
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_multi_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_cpu_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_monitor_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_router_ipv4_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>
> It works with the original "ifeq
> > ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern. What do
> you think about my proposed fix?
Maybe we should just unconditionally add "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" to
_tprogc_flags ?
And then we can drop that whole part:
ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
ifdef building_out_of_srctree
_tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
endif
endif
IOW, replace that $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) part with -I
$(objtree)/$(obj) and call it a day?
I honestly have no clue why it's this complicated and I doubt anybody
at this point remembers...
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
2023-07-20 17:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
@ 2023-07-21 1:05 ` Anh Tuan Phan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-21 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/21/23 00:05, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 9:13 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/23 23:46, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
>>>>> to the old one? Thx!
>>>>
>>>> Will do in the next version.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>>>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>>>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>>>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>>>>>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>>>>>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>>>>>>>> or should I remove this line?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
>>>>>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
>>>>>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>>>>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>>>>>> endif
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Change from the original patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
>>>>>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>> files
>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
>>>>>
>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>
>>>>> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
>>>>> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
>>>>> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
>>>>
>>>> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
>>>> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
>>>> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
>>>
>>> My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
>>> Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
>>> to some of the $(obj)s?
>>> I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
>>> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
>>> used in the other places.
>>
>> It turns out that your guess is right. "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" is only
>> needed for the following objects: xdp_redirect_map_multi_user,
>> xdp_redirect_cpu_user, xdp_redirect_map_user, xdp_redirect_user,
>> xdp_monitor_user and xdp_router_ipv4_user. There is a variable to add
>> flags for gcc named $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) but it has not been
>> set. My proposed fix is to set the following variables:
>
> Looks like these are the tests that use bpf skeleton.
>
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_multi_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_cpu_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_monitor_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_router_ipv4_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>>
>> It works with the original "ifeq
>>> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern. What do
>> you think about my proposed fix?
>
> Maybe we should just unconditionally add "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" to
> _tprogc_flags ?
>
> And then we can drop that whole part:
> ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> endif
> endif
>
> IOW, replace that $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) part with -I
> $(objtree)/$(obj) and call it a day?
> I honestly have no clue why it's this complicated and I doubt anybody
> at this point remembers...
That is the simplest way. I intended to do it but I didn't as I think
the condition is there for some reasons that I haven't understood yet.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree
@ 2023-07-21 1:05 ` Anh Tuan Phan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Anh Tuan Phan @ 2023-07-21 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: daniel, martin.lau, ast, andrii, bpf, linux-kernel-mentees
On 7/21/23 00:05, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 9:13 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/23 23:46, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:42 AM Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/11/23 00:18, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>> On 07/09, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>> I updated the patch to reflect your suggestion. Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> In the future, can you please post a new one with v+1 instead of replying
>>>>> to the old one? Thx!
>>>>
>>>> Will do in the next version.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/7/23 23:53, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/07, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/7/23 01:09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 07/06, Anh Tuan Phan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This commit fixes a few compilation issues when building out of source
>>>>>>>>>> tree. The command that I used to build samples/bpf:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/tmp
>>>>>>>>>> make V=1 M=samples/bpf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The compilation failed since it tried to find the header files in the
>>>>>>>>>> wrong places between output directory and source tree directory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++----
>>>>>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..32469aaa82d5 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does this $(src) need to be changed as well?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think this line doesn't affect the build. I removed it and it still
>>>>>>>> compiles (after "make -C samples/bpf clean"). I guess xdp_sample_user.c
>>>>>>>> doesn't include any file in tools/include/uapi. Am I missing something
>>>>>>>> or should I remove this line?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might have these headers installed on your system already if
>>>>>>> it compiles without this part. So I'd keep this part but do
>>>>>>> s/src/srctree/ (and remove ../..).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This parts seems to be copy-pasted all over the place in its 'ifeq'
>>>>>>>>> form. What is it doing and why is it needed?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>>>>>> endif
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anh Tuan Phan <tuananhlfc@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Change from the original patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Change "-I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi" to
>>>>>> "-I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile | 10 +++++-----
>>>>>> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 2 +-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> index 615f24ebc49c..cfc960b3713a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ $(obj)/hbm_edt_kern.o: $(src)/hbm.h $(src)/hbm_kern.h
>>>>>> # Override includes for xdp_sample_user.o because $(srctree)/usr/include in
>>>>>> # TPROGS_CFLAGS causes conflicts
>>>>>> XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi \
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) \
>>>>>> - -I$(src)/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>> + -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): TPROGS_CFLAGS = $(XDP_SAMPLE_CFLAGS)
>>>>>> $(obj)/$(XDP_SAMPLE): $(src)/xdp_sample_user.h $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ $(obj)/xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o: $(obj)/xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>> $(obj)/%.bpf.o: $(src)/%.bpf.c $(obj)/vmlinux.h $(src)/xdp_sample.bpf.h
>>>>>> $(src)/xdp_sample_shared.h
>>>>>> @echo " CLANG-BPF " $@
>>>>>> $(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(SRCARCH) \
>>>>>> - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> + -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -I$(obj) -I$(srctree)/include \
>>>>>> -I$(srctree)/samples/bpf -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>>>>>> -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) \
>>>>>> -c $(filter %.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
>>>>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ xdp_router_ipv4.skel.h-deps := xdp_router_ipv4.bpf.o
>>>>>> xdp_sample.bpf.o
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.bpf.o,%.bpf.c,$(foreach
>>>>>> skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> +BPF_SRCS_LINKED := $(notdir $(wildcard $(srctree)/$(src)/*.bpf.c))
>>>>>> BPF_OBJS_LINKED := $(patsubst %.bpf.c,$(obj)/%.bpf.o, $(BPF_SRCS_LINKED))
>>>>>> BPF_SKELS_LINKED := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(LINKED_SKELS))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> index 7621f55e2947..86a454cfb080 100644
>>>>>> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target
>>>>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ _tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \
>>>>>> $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source
>>>>>> files
>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
>>>>>
>>>>>> -ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>> +ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>>>>>> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
>>>>>> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>
>>>>> This question left undressed. Can you share more on why this change
>>>>> is needed? Because it looks like it's actually needed for M='' case.
>>>>> IOW, maybe we should add $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else?
>>>>
>>>> If it's needed for both cases M='' and M != '', is it better to just
>>>> remove the condition with $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)? FMPOV, -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
>>>> is only needed in case of building_out_of_srctree, no matter what
>>>> KBUILD_EXTMOD.
>>>
>>> My guess is that we're missing -I $(objtree)/$(obj) somewhere else.
>>> Depending on what/where it fails, we probably need to add $(objtree)
>>> to some of the $(obj)s?
>>> I'm mostly speculating here, because I see that "ifeq
>>> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern being
>>> used in the other places.
>>
>> It turns out that your guess is right. "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" is only
>> needed for the following objects: xdp_redirect_map_multi_user,
>> xdp_redirect_cpu_user, xdp_redirect_map_user, xdp_redirect_user,
>> xdp_monitor_user and xdp_router_ipv4_user. There is a variable to add
>> flags for gcc named $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) but it has not been
>> set. My proposed fix is to set the following variables:
>
> Looks like these are the tests that use bpf skeleton.
>
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_multi_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_cpu_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_map_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_redirect_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_monitor_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>> +TPROGCFLAGS_xdp_router_ipv4_user.o += -I$(objtree)/$(obj)
>>
>> It works with the original "ifeq
>>> ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + ifdef building_out_of_srctree" pattern. What do
>> you think about my proposed fix?
>
> Maybe we should just unconditionally add "-I $(objtree)/$(obj)" to
> _tprogc_flags ?
>
> And then we can drop that whole part:
> ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> _tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj)
> endif
> endif
>
> IOW, replace that $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) part with -I
> $(objtree)/$(obj) and call it a day?
> I honestly have no clue why it's this complicated and I doubt anybody
> at this point remembers...
That is the simplest way. I intended to do it but I didn't as I think
the condition is there for some reasons that I haven't understood yet.
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-21 1:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-06 15:25 [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Fix build out of source tree Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-06 15:25 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-06 18:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-06 18:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
2023-07-07 1:10 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-07 1:10 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-07 16:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 16:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
2023-07-09 14:45 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-09 14:45 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-10 17:18 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-10 17:18 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
2023-07-16 9:42 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-16 9:42 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-17 16:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-17 16:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
2023-07-19 16:13 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-19 16:13 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-20 17:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-20 17:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev via Linux-kernel-mentees
2023-07-21 1:05 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-21 1:05 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-09 5:12 ` Anh Tuan Phan
2023-07-09 5:12 ` Anh Tuan Phan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.