From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Cc: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com>,
Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5 v3] accel/qaic: tighten bounds checking in encode_message()
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:10:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKzyXx0z1gWDDJII@moroto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZKzx5nA6Z/0yhBJj@moroto>
There are several issues in this code. The check at the start of the
loop:
if (user_len >= user_msg->len) {
This check does not ensure that we have enough space for the trans_hdr
(8 bytes). Instead the check needs to be:
if (user_len >= user_msg->len - sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
That subtraction is done as an unsigned long we want to avoid
negatives. Add a lower bound to the start of the function.
if (user_msg->len < sizeof(*trans_hdr))
There is a second integer underflow which can happen if
trans_hdr->len is zero inside the encode_passthrough() function.
memcpy(out_trans->data, in_trans->data, in_trans->hdr.len - sizeof(in_trans->hdr));
Instead of adding a check to encode_passthrough() it's better to check
in this central place. Add that check:
if (trans_hdr->len < sizeof(trans_hdr)
The final concern is that the "user_len + trans_hdr->len" might have an
integer overflow bug. Use size_add() to prevent that.
- if (user_len + trans_hdr->len > user_msg->len) {
+ if (size_add(user_len, trans_hdr->len) > user_msg->len) {
Fixes: 129776ac2e38 ("accel/qaic: Add control path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
This is based on code review and not tested.
drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
index 5c57f7b4494e..a51b1594dcfa 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
@@ -748,7 +748,8 @@ static int encode_message(struct qaic_device *qdev, struct manage_msg *user_msg,
int ret;
int i;
- if (!user_msg->count) {
+ if (!user_msg->count ||
+ user_msg->len < sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
@@ -765,12 +766,13 @@ static int encode_message(struct qaic_device *qdev, struct manage_msg *user_msg,
}
for (i = 0; i < user_msg->count; ++i) {
- if (user_len >= user_msg->len) {
+ if (user_len >= user_msg->len - sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
trans_hdr = (struct qaic_manage_trans_hdr *)(user_msg->data + user_len);
- if (user_len + trans_hdr->len > user_msg->len) {
+ if (trans_hdr->len < sizeof(trans_hdr) ||
+ size_add(user_len, trans_hdr->len) > user_msg->len) {
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
--
2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>,
Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com>,
Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5 v3] accel/qaic: tighten bounds checking in encode_message()
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:10:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKzyXx0z1gWDDJII@moroto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZKzx5nA6Z/0yhBJj@moroto>
There are several issues in this code. The check at the start of the
loop:
if (user_len >= user_msg->len) {
This check does not ensure that we have enough space for the trans_hdr
(8 bytes). Instead the check needs to be:
if (user_len >= user_msg->len - sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
That subtraction is done as an unsigned long we want to avoid
negatives. Add a lower bound to the start of the function.
if (user_msg->len < sizeof(*trans_hdr))
There is a second integer underflow which can happen if
trans_hdr->len is zero inside the encode_passthrough() function.
memcpy(out_trans->data, in_trans->data, in_trans->hdr.len - sizeof(in_trans->hdr));
Instead of adding a check to encode_passthrough() it's better to check
in this central place. Add that check:
if (trans_hdr->len < sizeof(trans_hdr)
The final concern is that the "user_len + trans_hdr->len" might have an
integer overflow bug. Use size_add() to prevent that.
- if (user_len + trans_hdr->len > user_msg->len) {
+ if (size_add(user_len, trans_hdr->len) > user_msg->len) {
Fixes: 129776ac2e38 ("accel/qaic: Add control path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
This is based on code review and not tested.
drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
index 5c57f7b4494e..a51b1594dcfa 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
@@ -748,7 +748,8 @@ static int encode_message(struct qaic_device *qdev, struct manage_msg *user_msg,
int ret;
int i;
- if (!user_msg->count) {
+ if (!user_msg->count ||
+ user_msg->len < sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
@@ -765,12 +766,13 @@ static int encode_message(struct qaic_device *qdev, struct manage_msg *user_msg,
}
for (i = 0; i < user_msg->count; ++i) {
- if (user_len >= user_msg->len) {
+ if (user_len >= user_msg->len - sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
trans_hdr = (struct qaic_manage_trans_hdr *)(user_msg->data + user_len);
- if (user_len + trans_hdr->len > user_msg->len) {
+ if (trans_hdr->len < sizeof(trans_hdr) ||
+ size_add(user_len, trans_hdr->len) > user_msg->len) {
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 6:08 [PATCH 0/5 v3] accel/qaic: Improve bounds checking in encode/decode Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:10 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2023-07-11 6:10 ` [PATCH 1/5 v3] accel/qaic: tighten bounds checking in encode_message() Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:12 ` [PATCH 2/5 v3] accel/qaic: tighten bounds checking in decode_message() Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:12 ` [PATCH 3/5 v3] accel/qaic: Add consistent integer overflow checks Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:13 ` [PATCH 5/5 v3] accel/qaic: Fix a leak in map_user_pages() Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 6:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-11 7:23 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2023-07-11 7:23 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZKzyXx0z1gWDDJII@moroto \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_carlv@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_jhugo@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com \
--cc=stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.