* [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-12 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-07-12 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: juri.lelli, peterz, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev,
linux-s390, vschneid, vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, mgorman,
borntraeger, gor, hca, npiggin, bp, rostedt, tglx,
dietmar.eggemann, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, svens, bristot
Hi
Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
for the package mask :-)
Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index fbbb695bae3d..5ed6b9fe5094 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
#endif
{ shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CACHE) },
{ cpu_mc_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
- { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
+ { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
{ NULL, },
};
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
index 68adf1de8888..c803f5e6ab46 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level s390_topology[] = {
{ cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
{ cpu_book_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(BOOK) },
{ cpu_drawer_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DRAWER) },
- { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
+ { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
{ NULL, },
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index e1aa2cd7734b..09cc9d0aa358 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
*/
if (!x86_has_numa_in_package) {
x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
- cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE)
+ cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG)
};
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index d3a3b2646ec4..e9d9cf776b7a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level default_topology[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
{ cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
#endif
- { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
+ { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
{ NULL, },
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-12 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-07-12 15:02 ` Valentin Schneider
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Schneider @ 2023-07-12 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner
Cc: mpe, npiggin, christophe.leroy, hca, gor, agordeev, borntraeger,
svens, tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, peterz, juri.lelli,
vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman,
bristot, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, linux-s390
On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>
FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
to see:
- * - Package (DIE)
+ * - Package (PKG)
With that:
Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a80a73909dc2a..190a647534984 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9439,7 +9439,7 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
* can only do it if @group is an SMT group and has exactly on busy CPU. Larger
* imbalances in the number of CPUS are dealt with in find_busiest_group().
*
- * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at DIE domain level, always
+ * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at PKG domain level, always
* proceed.
*
* Return: true if @env::dst_cpu can do with asym_packing load balance. False
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index e9d9cf776b7ab..2cdcfec1d1c89 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
*
* - Simultaneous multithreading (SMT)
* - Multi-Core Cache (MC)
- * - Package (DIE)
+ * - Package (PKG)
*
* Where the last one more or less denotes everything up to a NUMA node.
*
@@ -1140,13 +1140,13 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
*
* CPU 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
*
- * DIE [ ]
+ * PKG [ ]
* MC [ ] [ ]
* SMT [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
*
* - or -
*
- * DIE 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
+ * PKG 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
* MC 0-3 0-3 0-3 0-3 4-7 4-7 4-7 4-7
* SMT 0-1 0-1 2-3 2-3 4-5 4-5 6-7 6-7
*
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-12 15:02 ` Valentin Schneider
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Schneider @ 2023-07-12 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner
Cc: juri.lelli, peterz, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev,
linux-s390, vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, mgorman, borntraeger,
gor, hca, npiggin, bp, rostedt, tglx, dietmar.eggemann,
linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, svens, bristot
On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>
FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
to see:
- * - Package (DIE)
+ * - Package (PKG)
With that:
Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a80a73909dc2a..190a647534984 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9439,7 +9439,7 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
* can only do it if @group is an SMT group and has exactly on busy CPU. Larger
* imbalances in the number of CPUS are dealt with in find_busiest_group().
*
- * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at DIE domain level, always
+ * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at PKG domain level, always
* proceed.
*
* Return: true if @env::dst_cpu can do with asym_packing load balance. False
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index e9d9cf776b7ab..2cdcfec1d1c89 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
*
* - Simultaneous multithreading (SMT)
* - Multi-Core Cache (MC)
- * - Package (DIE)
+ * - Package (PKG)
*
* Where the last one more or less denotes everything up to a NUMA node.
*
@@ -1140,13 +1140,13 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
*
* CPU 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
*
- * DIE [ ]
+ * PKG [ ]
* MC [ ] [ ]
* SMT [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
*
* - or -
*
- * DIE 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
+ * PKG 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
* MC 0-3 0-3 0-3 0-3 4-7 4-7 4-7 4-7
* SMT 0-1 0-1 2-3 2-3 4-5 4-5 6-7 6-7
*
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-12 15:02 ` Valentin Schneider
@ 2023-07-12 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-07-12 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valentin Schneider
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, mpe, npiggin, christophe.leroy, hca, gor,
agordeev, borntraeger, svens, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa,
juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, bristot, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, linux-s390
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:02:38PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> > for the package mask :-)
> >
> > Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> > I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
> >
>
> FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
Confusion is due to x86 growing an actual die topology and this not
being it.
Other than that, I can't be bothered too much about the silly name
either.
> There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
> to see:
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
>
> With that:
> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Durr, I did a git-grep SD_INIT_NAME().. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-12 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-07-12 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valentin Schneider
Cc: juri.lelli, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev, linux-s390,
vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, mgorman, borntraeger, gor, hca,
npiggin, bp, rostedt, Thomas Gleixner, dietmar.eggemann, bristot,
linux-kernel, svens, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:02:38PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> > for the package mask :-)
> >
> > Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> > I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
> >
>
> FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
Confusion is due to x86 growing an actual die topology and this not
being it.
Other than that, I can't be bothered too much about the silly name
either.
> There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
> to see:
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
>
> With that:
> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Durr, I did a git-grep SD_INIT_NAME().. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-12 15:02 ` Valentin Schneider
@ 2023-07-14 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2023-07-14 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valentin Schneider
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner, mpe, npiggin, christophe.leroy,
hca, gor, agordeev, borntraeger, svens, mingo, bp, dave.hansen,
x86, hpa, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt,
bsegall, bristot, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, linux-s390
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:02:38PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> > for the package mask :-)
> >
> > Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> > I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
> >
>
> FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
>
> There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
> to see:
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
>
> With that:
> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>
No objection either, PKG is less ambiguous than DIE
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-14 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2023-07-14 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Valentin Schneider
Cc: juri.lelli, Peter Zijlstra, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev,
linux-s390, vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, borntraeger, gor, hca,
npiggin, bp, rostedt, Thomas Gleixner, dietmar.eggemann, bristot,
linux-kernel, svens, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:02:38PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> > for the package mask :-)
> >
> > Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> > I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
> >
>
> FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
>
> There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
> to see:
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
>
> With that:
> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>
No objection either, PKG is less ambiguous than DIE
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-12 15:02 ` Valentin Schneider
@ 2023-07-14 14:25 ` Shrikanth Hegde
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2023-07-14 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: juri.lelli, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev, linux-s390,
vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, mgorman, borntraeger, gor, hca,
npiggin, bp, rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, linuxppc-dev,
linux-kernel, svens, bristot, Thomas Gleixner, Valentin Schneider
On 7/12/23 8:32 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
>> for the package mask :-)
>>
>> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
>> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>>
>
> FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
>
> There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
> to see:
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
>
> With that:
> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index a80a73909dc2a..190a647534984 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9439,7 +9439,7 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> * can only do it if @group is an SMT group and has exactly on busy CPU. Larger
> * imbalances in the number of CPUS are dealt with in find_busiest_group().
> *
> - * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at DIE domain level, always
> + * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at PKG domain level, always
> * proceed.
> *
> * Return: true if @env::dst_cpu can do with asym_packing load balance. False
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index e9d9cf776b7ab..2cdcfec1d1c89 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> *
> * - Simultaneous multithreading (SMT)
> * - Multi-Core Cache (MC)
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
> *
> * Where the last one more or less denotes everything up to a NUMA node.
> *
> @@ -1140,13 +1140,13 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> *
> * CPU 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> *
> - * DIE [ ]
> + * PKG [ ]
> * MC [ ] [ ]
> * SMT [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
> *
> * - or -
> *
> - * DIE 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
> + * PKG 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
> * MC 0-3 0-3 0-3 0-3 4-7 4-7 4-7 4-7
> * SMT 0-1 0-1 2-3 2-3 4-5 4-5 6-7 6-7
> *
>
A couple of comments missing the change still? Not sure if it taken care already.
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index fbbb695bae3d..9b1853bf6b1d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
/* Skip all CPUs already part of current CPU core mask */
cpumask_andnot(mask, cpu_online_mask, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
- /* If chip_id is -1; limit the cpu_core_mask to within DIE*/
+ /* If chip_id is -1; limit the cpu_core_mask to within PKG*/
if (chip_id == -1)
cpumask_and(mask, mask, cpu_cpu_mask(cpu));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index e1aa2cd7734b..3f175e70eb7a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
};
#endif
/*
- * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the DIE domain
+ * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
* since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
* domains based on the SLIT.
*/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-14 14:25 ` Shrikanth Hegde
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2023-07-14 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: juri.lelli, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev, linux-s390,
Valentin Schneider, vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, mgorman,
borntraeger, gor, hca, npiggin, bp, rostedt, Thomas Gleixner,
dietmar.eggemann, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, svens, bristot
On 7/12/23 8:32 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
>> for the package mask :-)
>>
>> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
>> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>>
>
> FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
>
> There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
> to see:
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
>
> With that:
> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index a80a73909dc2a..190a647534984 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9439,7 +9439,7 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> * can only do it if @group is an SMT group and has exactly on busy CPU. Larger
> * imbalances in the number of CPUS are dealt with in find_busiest_group().
> *
> - * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at DIE domain level, always
> + * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at PKG domain level, always
> * proceed.
> *
> * Return: true if @env::dst_cpu can do with asym_packing load balance. False
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index e9d9cf776b7ab..2cdcfec1d1c89 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> *
> * - Simultaneous multithreading (SMT)
> * - Multi-Core Cache (MC)
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
> *
> * Where the last one more or less denotes everything up to a NUMA node.
> *
> @@ -1140,13 +1140,13 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> *
> * CPU 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> *
> - * DIE [ ]
> + * PKG [ ]
> * MC [ ] [ ]
> * SMT [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
> *
> * - or -
> *
> - * DIE 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
> + * PKG 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
> * MC 0-3 0-3 0-3 0-3 4-7 4-7 4-7 4-7
> * SMT 0-1 0-1 2-3 2-3 4-5 4-5 6-7 6-7
> *
>
A couple of comments missing the change still? Not sure if it taken care already.
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index fbbb695bae3d..9b1853bf6b1d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
/* Skip all CPUs already part of current CPU core mask */
cpumask_andnot(mask, cpu_online_mask, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
- /* If chip_id is -1; limit the cpu_core_mask to within DIE*/
+ /* If chip_id is -1; limit the cpu_core_mask to within PKG*/
if (chip_id == -1)
cpumask_and(mask, mask, cpu_cpu_mask(cpu));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index e1aa2cd7734b..3f175e70eb7a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
};
#endif
/*
- * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the DIE domain
+ * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
* since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
* domains based on the SLIT.
*/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-12 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-07-14 14:04 ` Heiko Carstens
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Carstens @ 2023-07-14 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, mpe, npiggin, christophe.leroy, gor, agordeev,
borntraeger, svens, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, juri.lelli,
vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman,
bristot, vschneid, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, linux-s390
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:10:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
For s390:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-14 14:04 ` Heiko Carstens
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Carstens @ 2023-07-14 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: juri.lelli, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev, linux-s390,
vschneid, vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, mgorman, borntraeger, gor,
npiggin, bp, rostedt, Thomas Gleixner, dietmar.eggemann, bristot,
linux-kernel, svens, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:10:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
For s390:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-12 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-07-17 5:42 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Gautham R. Shenoy @ 2023-07-17 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, mpe, npiggin, christophe.leroy, hca, gor,
agordeev, borntraeger, svens, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa,
juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, bristot, vschneid, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel,
linux-s390
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:10:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
This naming makes sense.
Acked-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-17 5:42 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Gautham R. Shenoy @ 2023-07-17 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: juri.lelli, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev, linux-s390,
vschneid, vincent.guittot, x86, mingo, mgorman, borntraeger, gor,
hca, npiggin, bp, rostedt, Thomas Gleixner, dietmar.eggemann,
linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, svens, bristot
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:10:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
This naming makes sense.
Acked-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-12 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-07-17 13:51 ` Vincent Guittot
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Guittot @ 2023-07-17 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, mpe, npiggin, christophe.leroy, hca, gor,
agordeev, borntraeger, svens, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa,
juri.lelli, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, bristot,
vschneid, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, linux-s390
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:11, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
May be a link to the change that triggers this patch could be useful
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
Apart the remaining reference to DIE already mentioned by others,
looks good to me
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index fbbb695bae3d..5ed6b9fe5094 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
> #endif
> { shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CACHE) },
> { cpu_mc_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> - { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
> { NULL, },
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> index 68adf1de8888..c803f5e6ab46 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level s390_topology[] = {
> { cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> { cpu_book_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(BOOK) },
> { cpu_drawer_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DRAWER) },
> - { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
> { NULL, },
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index e1aa2cd7734b..09cc9d0aa358 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
> */
> if (!x86_has_numa_in_package) {
> x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> - cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE)
> + cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG)
> };
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index d3a3b2646ec4..e9d9cf776b7a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level default_topology[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
> { cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> #endif
> - { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
> { NULL, },
> };
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-17 13:51 ` Vincent Guittot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Guittot @ 2023-07-17 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: juri.lelli, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev, linux-s390,
vschneid, x86, mingo, mgorman, borntraeger, gor, hca, npiggin, bp,
rostedt, Thomas Gleixner, dietmar.eggemann, bristot, linux-kernel,
svens, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:11, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> for the package mask :-)
May be a link to the change that triggers this patch could be useful
>
> Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
Apart the remaining reference to DIE already mentioned by others,
looks good to me
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index fbbb695bae3d..5ed6b9fe5094 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
> #endif
> { shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CACHE) },
> { cpu_mc_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> - { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
> { NULL, },
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> index 68adf1de8888..c803f5e6ab46 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level s390_topology[] = {
> { cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> { cpu_book_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(BOOK) },
> { cpu_drawer_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DRAWER) },
> - { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
> { NULL, },
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index e1aa2cd7734b..09cc9d0aa358 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
> */
> if (!x86_has_numa_in_package) {
> x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> - cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE)
> + cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG)
> };
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index d3a3b2646ec4..e9d9cf776b7a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level default_topology[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
> { cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> #endif
> - { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
> { NULL, },
> };
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
2023-07-17 13:51 ` Vincent Guittot
@ 2023-07-17 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-07-17 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Guittot
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, mpe, npiggin, christophe.leroy, hca, gor,
agordeev, borntraeger, svens, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa,
juri.lelli, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, bristot,
vschneid, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, linux-s390
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:11, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> > for the package mask :-)
>
> May be a link to the change that triggers this patch could be useful
Thomas should post soonish..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
@ 2023-07-17 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-07-17 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Guittot
Cc: juri.lelli, dave.hansen, bsegall, hpa, agordeev, linux-s390,
vschneid, x86, mingo, mgorman, borntraeger, gor, hca, npiggin, bp,
rostedt, Thomas Gleixner, dietmar.eggemann, bristot, linux-kernel,
svens, linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:11, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> > for the package mask :-)
>
> May be a link to the change that triggers this patch could be useful
Thomas should post soonish..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Rename 'DIE' domain to 'PKG'
2023-07-12 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2023-10-12 17:50 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-10-12 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Ingo Molnar,
Valentin Schneider, Mel Gorman, Heiko Carstens, Gautham R. Shenoy,
Vincent Guittot, x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: f577cd57bfaa889cf0718e30e92c08c7f78c9d85
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f577cd57bfaa889cf0718e30e92c08c7f78c9d85
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:10:56 +02:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:38:16 +02:00
sched/topology: Rename 'DIE' domain to 'PKG'
While reworking the x86 topology code Thomas tripped over creating a 'DIE' domain
for the package mask. :-)
Since these names are CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y only, rename them to make the
name less ambiguous.
[ Shrikanth Hegde: rename on s390 as well. ]
[ Valentin Schneider: also rename it in the comments. ]
[ mingo: port to recent kernels & find all remaining occurances. ]
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712141056.GI3100107@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 4 ++--
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/topology.c | 8 ++++----
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 5826f51..4e48700 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
#endif
{ shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CACHE) },
{ cpu_mc_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
- { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
+ { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
{ NULL, },
};
@@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
/* Skip all CPUs already part of current CPU core mask */
cpumask_andnot(mask, cpu_online_mask, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
- /* If chip_id is -1; limit the cpu_core_mask to within DIE*/
+ /* If chip_id is -1; limit the cpu_core_mask to within PKG */
if (chip_id == -1)
cpumask_and(mask, mask, cpu_cpu_mask(cpu));
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
index 68adf1d..66bda6a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level s390_topology[] = {
{ cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
{ cpu_book_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(BOOK) },
{ cpu_drawer_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DRAWER) },
- { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
+ { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
{ NULL, },
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 02765d9..e3b3e80 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -641,13 +641,13 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
};
#endif
/*
- * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the DIE domain
+ * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
* since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
* domains based on the SLIT.
*/
if (!x86_has_numa_in_package) {
x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
- cpu_cpu_mask, x86_die_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE)
+ cpu_cpu_mask, x86_die_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG)
};
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9229051..a751e55 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9555,7 +9555,7 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
* can only do it if @group is an SMT group and has exactly on busy CPU. Larger
* imbalances in the number of CPUS are dealt with in find_busiest_group().
*
- * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at DIE domain level, always
+ * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at PKG domain level, always
* proceed.
*
* Return: true if @env::dst_cpu can do with asym_packing load balance. False
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index d950861..a63729f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ fail:
*
* - Simultaneous multithreading (SMT)
* - Multi-Core Cache (MC)
- * - Package (DIE)
+ * - Package (PKG)
*
* Where the last one more or less denotes everything up to a NUMA node.
*
@@ -1141,13 +1141,13 @@ fail:
*
* CPU 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
*
- * DIE [ ]
+ * PKG [ ]
* MC [ ] [ ]
* SMT [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
*
* - or -
*
- * DIE 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
+ * PKG 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7
* MC 0-3 0-3 0-3 0-3 4-7 4-7 4-7 4-7
* SMT 0-1 0-1 2-3 2-3 4-5 4-5 6-7 6-7
*
@@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level default_topology[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
{ cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
#endif
- { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
+ { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG) },
{ NULL, },
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread