Re: [PATCH] migration: Allow user to specify migration available bandwidth

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:10:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:38:23PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > I see you used "convergance" explicitly even after PeterM's reply, is that
> > what you prefer over "convergence"?  I do see more occurances of
> > "convergence" as a word in migration context, though.
> 
> Ignore my speling erors :-)

Ohh, so that's not intended. :) Actually there's indeed the word
"convergance" which can be applied here, but since I'm not native I really
can't figure out the fact even with a dictionary.

> 
> >                                                       Any better name you
> > can come up with, before I just go with "max-convergence-bandwidth" (I
> > really cannot come up with anything better than this or available-bandwidth
> > for now)?
> 
> Anothre idea could be 'max-switchover-bandwidth'  ?

Yeah, switchover can also be called a phase of migration, so in parallel of
existing precopy/postcopy, sounds like a good one.  I'll respin with that
if no further suggestions.  Thanks.

-- 
Peter Xu