From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
Vitaly Lubart <vitaly.lubart@intel.com>,
Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: fix use-after-free in mtd release
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:58:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMKUJbl7kFOfgKGg@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727172013.7c85c05d@xps-13>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote on Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:12:04
> +0300:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 05:57:58PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
...
> > > Fixes: 19bfa9ebebb5 ("mtd: use refcount to prevent corruption")
> >
> > Closes: ?
>
> Did I miss a recent update on the use of Fixes?
They are orthogonal to each other. Actually Closes goes closer with
Reported-by.
I believe both of them needs to be added (by I might miss something).
> I thought Closes was
> supposed to point at a bug report while Fixes would point to the faulty
> commit.
Correct.
> Right now I feel like Fixes is the right tag,
Nobody objects that (see above).
> but if you have a source explaining why we should not longer do it like
> I am used to, I would appreciate a link.
Since you know about Closes already, I think there is nothing to add.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
Vitaly Lubart <vitaly.lubart@intel.com>,
Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: fix use-after-free in mtd release
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:58:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMKUJbl7kFOfgKGg@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727172013.7c85c05d@xps-13>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote on Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:12:04
> +0300:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 05:57:58PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
...
> > > Fixes: 19bfa9ebebb5 ("mtd: use refcount to prevent corruption")
> >
> > Closes: ?
>
> Did I miss a recent update on the use of Fixes?
They are orthogonal to each other. Actually Closes goes closer with
Reported-by.
I believe both of them needs to be added (by I might miss something).
> I thought Closes was
> supposed to point at a bug report while Fixes would point to the faulty
> commit.
Correct.
> Right now I feel like Fixes is the right tag,
Nobody objects that (see above).
> but if you have a source explaining why we should not longer do it like
> I am used to, I would appreciate a link.
Since you know about Closes already, I think there is nothing to add.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 14:57 [PATCH] mtd: fix use-after-free in mtd release Alexander Usyskin
2023-07-27 14:57 ` Alexander Usyskin
2023-07-27 15:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-27 15:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-27 15:20 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-27 15:20 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-27 15:58 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-07-27 15:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-27 16:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-27 16:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-30 11:10 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2023-07-30 11:10 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2023-07-31 1:35 ` zhangxiaoxu (A)
2023-07-31 1:35 ` zhangxiaoxu (A)
2023-08-02 12:44 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-02 12:44 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-03 12:06 ` huaweicloud
2023-08-03 12:06 ` huaweicloud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMKUJbl7kFOfgKGg@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vitaly.lubart@intel.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.