Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 12:57:39PM +0000, Pandey, Radhey Shyam wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 9:47 PM
> > To: Pandey, Radhey Shyam <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>
> > Cc: andersson@kernel.org; mathieu.poirier@linaro.org;
> > krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; Simek, Michal
> > <michal.simek@amd.com>; Levinsky, Ben <ben.levinsky@amd.com>; Shah,
> > Tanmay <tanmay.shah@amd.com>; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org;
> > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@amd.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled
> > Memory (TCM) bindings
> > 
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 12:11:48AM +0530, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
> > > Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq
> > > UltraScale+ platform. It will help in defining TCM in device-tree
> > > and make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven.
> > 
> > From the subject, it sounds like this is a binding for all of remoteproc for
> > TCMs.
> > 
> > Otherwise,
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for the review. Just checking if this patch will be taken through
> devicetree or remoteproc tree?


Please send the driver changes and I'll pickup everything at once.

Thanks,
Mathieu