All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, michal.orzel@amd.com,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [XEN][PATCH v9 08/19] xen/device-tree: Add device_tree_find_node_by_path() to find nodes in device tree
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 21:08:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOgpIaPhV7QrgXTl@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b18ef35f-a4df-4121-9b3c-aa96a8002d87@xen.org>

Hi Julien,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 08:21:17PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Vikram,
> 
> On 19/08/2023 01:28, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> > Add device_tree_find_node_by_path() to find a matching node with path for a
> > dt_device_node.
> > 
> > Reason behind this function:
> >      Each time overlay nodes are added using .dtbo, a new fdt(memcpy of
> 
> Typo: missing space before (.
> 
> >      device_tree_flattened) is created and updated with overlay nodes. This
> >      updated fdt is further unflattened to a dt_host_new. Next, we need to find
> >      the overlay nodes in dt_host_new, find the overlay node's parent in dt_host
> >      and add the nodes as child under their parent in the dt_host. Thus we need
> >      this function to search for node in different unflattened device trees.
> > 
> > Also, make dt_find_node_by_path() static inline.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com>
> 
> > ---
> > Changes from v7:
> >      Rename device_tree_find_node_by_path() to dt_find_node_by_path_from().
> >      Fix indentation.
> > ---
> > ---
> >   xen/common/device_tree.c      |  5 +++--
> >   xen/include/xen/device_tree.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > index 67e9b6de3e..0f10037745 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > @@ -358,11 +358,12 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct dt_device_node *from,
> >       return np;
> >   }
> > -struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path)
> > +struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path_from(struct dt_device_node *from,
> > +                                                 const char *path)
> 
> Any change this both 'from' and the return can be const?
Doing this will also need changes in dt_find_node_by_path() and
dt_for_each_device_node(). This function calls both of these.
> 
> >   {
> >       struct dt_device_node *np;
> > -    dt_for_each_device_node(dt_host, np)
> > +    dt_for_each_device_node(from, np)
> >           if ( np->full_name && (dt_node_cmp(np->full_name, path) == 0) )
> >               break;
> > diff --git a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> > index 5941599eff..e507658b23 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> > @@ -568,13 +568,27 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct dt_device_node *from,
> >   struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_alias(const char *alias);
> >   /**
> > - * dt_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path
> > + * dt_find_node_by_path_from - Generic function to find a node matching the
> > + * full DT path for any given unflatten device tree
> > + * @from: The device tree node to start searching from
> >    * @path: The full path to match
> >    *
> >    * Returns a node pointer.
> >    */
> > -struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path);
> > +struct dt_device_node *
> > +                    dt_find_node_by_path_from(struct dt_device_node *from,
> > +                                                  const char *path);
> 
> Coding style: The indentation look rather odd. I am not sure it will render
> properly here. But one style that is closer to the rest of the file and Xen
> is:
> 
> struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path_from(struct dt_device_node
> *from,
>                                                  const char *path);
> 
> Where the return type, function name and first parameter is one line and the
> second parameter is on the second line with the type aligned with the type
> of the first parameter.
Will do!
> 
> > +/**
> > + * dt_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path in dt_host
> > + * @path: The full path to match
> > + *
> > + * Returns a node pointer.
> > + */
> > +static inline struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path)
> > +{
> > +    return dt_find_node_by_path_from(dt_host, path);
> > +}
> >   /**
> >    * dt_find_node_by_gpath - Same as dt_find_node_by_path but retrieve the
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> Julien Grall


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-25  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-19  0:28 [XEN][PATCH v9 00/19] dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 01/19] common/device_tree: handle memory allocation failure in __unflatten_device_tree() Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 19:06   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 02/19] common/device_tree.c: unflatten_device_tree() propagate errors Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 18:11   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 03/19] xen/arm/device: Remove __init from function type Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 18:59   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-25  0:52     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-25  8:02       ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 04/19] common/device_tree: Export __unflatten_device_tree() Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 19:05   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-25  0:54     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 05/19] xen/arm: Add CONFIG_OVERLAY_DTB Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 19:10   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-25  3:17     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-25  8:05       ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 06/19] libfdt: Keep fdt functions after init for CONFIG_OVERLAY_DTB Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 07/19] libfdt: overlay: change overlay_get_target() Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 08/19] xen/device-tree: Add device_tree_find_node_by_path() to find nodes in device tree Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 19:21   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-25  4:08     ` Vikram Garhwal [this message]
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 09/19] xen/iommu: Move spin_lock from iommu_dt_device_is_assigned to caller Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-21  6:53   ` Jan Beulich
2023-08-21 19:41     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 19:43   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-25  5:09     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 10/19] xen/iommu: protect iommu_add_dt_device() with dtdevs_lock Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 19:47   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-25  4:44     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-25  8:09       ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 11/19] xen/iommu: Introduce iommu_remove_dt_device() Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-22 20:01   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 12/19] xen/smmu: Add remove_device callback for smmu_iommu ops Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 13/19] asm/smp.h: Fix circular dependency for device_tree.h and rwlock.h Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-23 21:41   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 14/19] common/device_tree: Add rwlock for dt_host Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-23 22:06   ` Julien Grall
2023-08-25  6:22     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-25  7:52       ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-25  8:15         ` Julien Grall
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 15/19] xen/arm: Implement device tree node removal functionalities Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 16/19] xen/arm: Implement device tree node addition functionalities Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 17/19] tools/libs/ctrl: Implement new xc interfaces for dt overlay Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-21 16:18   ` Anthony PERARD
2023-08-21 18:53     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 18/19] tools/libs/light: Implement new libxl functions for device tree overlay ops Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-19  0:28 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 19/19] tools/xl: Add new xl command overlay for device tree overlay support Vikram Garhwal
2023-08-23 22:18 ` [XEN][PATCH v9 00/19] dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZOgpIaPhV7QrgXTl@amd.com \
    --to=vikram.garhwal@amd.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.