From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 08/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:59:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOzgja8mfNefRqP7@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728023959.12293-9-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Hi Tinghan,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 10:39:53AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
>
> Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
> When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
> through the cluster list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d67dcabdab9e..d9242c3eb0d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> }
>
> static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
> + const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> scp = rproc->priv;
> scp->rproc = rproc;
> scp->dev = dev;
> - scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + scp->data = of_data;
> scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
>
> @@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> }
>
> -static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> struct mtk_scp *scp;
> int ret;
>
> - scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> + scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
> if (IS_ERR(scp))
> return PTR_ERR(scp);
>
> @@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> + struct platform_device *cpdev;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> + const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
> + struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> + int core_id = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> + if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> + if (!cpdev) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
> + put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + scp_free(scp);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
> + core_id++;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
> +
Here we are setting the platform device for @pdev to the last @scp that was
created, which is needed because (1) scp_rproc_init() is calling
platform_set_drvdata() on the child platform devices and (2) we need a handle to
the cluster list in scp_remove().
Please add a comment with the above just before calling platform_set_drvdata().
Otherwise it will be very difficult for people not familiar with the driver to
understand what is going on.
Otherwise I think we are done.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + return 0;
> +
> +init_fail:
> + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
> + list_del(&scp->elem);
> + rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> + scp_free(scp);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> + struct device_node *child;
> +
> + child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> + if (!child)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
> +
> + of_node_put(child);
> + return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (ret)
> + ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> + else
> + ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
>
> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
> +
> ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> };
>
> +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> + &mt8195_of_data,
> + &mt8195_of_data_c1,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> --
> 2.18.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 08/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:59:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOzgja8mfNefRqP7@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728023959.12293-9-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Hi Tinghan,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 10:39:53AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
>
> Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
> When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
> through the cluster list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d67dcabdab9e..d9242c3eb0d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> }
>
> static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
> + const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> scp = rproc->priv;
> scp->rproc = rproc;
> scp->dev = dev;
> - scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + scp->data = of_data;
> scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
>
> @@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> }
>
> -static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> struct mtk_scp *scp;
> int ret;
>
> - scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> + scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
> if (IS_ERR(scp))
> return PTR_ERR(scp);
>
> @@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> + struct platform_device *cpdev;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> + const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
> + struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> + int core_id = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> + if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> + if (!cpdev) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
> + put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + scp_free(scp);
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> +
> + list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
> + core_id++;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
> +
Here we are setting the platform device for @pdev to the last @scp that was
created, which is needed because (1) scp_rproc_init() is calling
platform_set_drvdata() on the child platform devices and (2) we need a handle to
the cluster list in scp_remove().
Please add a comment with the above just before calling platform_set_drvdata().
Otherwise it will be very difficult for people not familiar with the driver to
understand what is going on.
Otherwise I think we are done.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + return 0;
> +
> +init_fail:
> + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
> + list_del(&scp->elem);
> + rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> + scp_free(scp);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> + struct device_node *child;
> +
> + child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> + if (!child)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
> +
> + of_node_put(child);
> + return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (ret)
> + ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> + else
> + ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
>
> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
> +
> ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> };
>
> +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> + &mt8195_of_data,
> + &mt8195_of_data_c1,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> --
> 2.18.0
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-28 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 2:39 [PATCH v16 00/14] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 01/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode definition Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 02/14] arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 03/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 04/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 05/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 06/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Revise SCP rproc initialization flow for multi-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 07/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 08/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-08-28 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2023-08-28 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-08-30 2:36 ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
2023-08-30 2:36 ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 09/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 10/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 11/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 12/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 13/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` [PATCH v16 14/14] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core Tinghan Shen
2023-07-28 2:39 ` Tinghan Shen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-04 15:08 [PATCH v16 08/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOzgja8mfNefRqP7@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tinghan.shen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.