From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add base performance sysfs attributes
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:35:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPJLIlS7K7ey17kL@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901121545.361436-3-sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 05:45:44PM +0530, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
> Add the following attribute to Xe sysfs
> - base_freq_factor
> - base_freq_factor.scale
> - base_freq_rp0
> - base_freq_rpn
>
> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h | 19 +++++
> 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> index c03bb58e7049..6a139d1dbf66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
again, this has nothing to do with guc_pc.
We clearly need a new component to handle the frequency.
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include "xe_map.h"
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> #include "xe_pcode.h"
> +#include "xe_pcode_api.h"
>
> #define MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB 0x140000
>
> @@ -37,6 +38,9 @@
> #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
> #define GEN9_FREQ_SCALER 3
>
> +#define U8_8_VAL_MASK 0xffff
> +#define U8_8_SCALE_TO_VALUE "0.00390625"
> +
> /**
> * DOC: GuC Power Conservation (PC)
> *
> @@ -642,6 +646,112 @@ static const struct attribute *pc_attrs[] = {
> NULL
> };
>
> +static ssize_t freq_factor_scale_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buff)
> +{
> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%s\n", U8_8_SCALE_TO_VALUE);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t base_freq_factor_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buff)
> +{
> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
> + u32 val;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = xe_pcode_read_p(gt, PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_GET,
> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_CHIPLET,
> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + val &= U8_8_VAL_MASK;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", val);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t base_freq_factor_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buff, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
> + u32 val;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (val > U8_8_VAL_MASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + err = xe_pcode_write_p(gt, PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_SET,
> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_CHIPLET,
> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(base_freq_factor);
> +static struct device_attribute dev_attr_base_freq_factor_scale =
> + __ATTR(base_freq_factor.scale, 0444, freq_factor_scale_show, NULL);
> +
> +
> +static ssize_t base_freq_rp0_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buff)
> +{
> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
> + u32 val;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = xe_pcode_read_p(gt, XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG,
> + PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_P0,
> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + /* data_out - Fused P0 for domain ID in units of 50 MHz */
> + val *= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", val);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(base_freq_rp0);
> +
> +static ssize_t base_freq_rpn_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buff)
> +{
> + struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
> + struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(kobj);
> + u32 val;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = xe_pcode_read_p(gt, XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG,
> + PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_PN,
> + PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + /* data_out - Fused Pn for domain ID in units of 50 MHz */
> + val *= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", val);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(base_freq_rpn);
> +
> +static const struct attribute *pvc_perf_power_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_base_freq_factor.attr,
> + &dev_attr_base_freq_factor_scale.attr,
> + &dev_attr_base_freq_rp0.attr,
> + &dev_attr_base_freq_rpn.attr,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> static void mtl_init_fused_rp_values(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> @@ -925,6 +1035,12 @@ int xe_guc_pc_init(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> + err = sysfs_create_files(gt->sysfs, pvc_perf_power_attrs);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, pc_fini, pc);
> if (err)
> return err;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> index 837ff7c71280..da4114bfaa7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,25 @@
> #define PCODE_READ_MIN_FREQ_TABLE 0x9
> #define PCODE_FREQ_RING_RATIO_SHIFT 16
>
> +#define XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG 0x6e /* xehp, pvc */
> +/* XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG sub-commands (param1) */
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_P0 0x0
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_PN 0x1
> +/* PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_* - mailbox domain IDs */
> +/* XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG param2 */
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_NONE 0x0
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_GT 0x1
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_HBM 0x2
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_MEDIAFF 0x3
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_MEDIA_SAMPLER 0x4
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_SYSTOLIC_ARRAY 0x5
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_CHIPLET 0x6
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE_CHIPLET_LINK 0x7
> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_BASE 0x8
> +#define PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_SET 0x67
> +/* See PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_* - mailbox domain IDs - param1 and 2 */
> +#define PVC_PCODE_QOS_MULTIPLIER_GET 0x66
> +
> /* PCODE Init */
> #define DGFX_PCODE_STATUS 0x7E
> #define DGFX_GET_INIT_STATUS 0x0
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-01 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 12:15 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] Add some performance and frequency sysfs nodes Sujaritha Sundaresan
2023-09-01 12:08 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for " Patchwork
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Add a couple of pcode helpers Sujaritha Sundaresan
2023-09-01 20:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-03 13:30 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-12 5:08 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-12 14:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-13 4:03 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-25 8:13 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-26 17:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add base performance sysfs attributes Sujaritha Sundaresan
2023-09-01 20:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-09-03 13:36 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-12 8:48 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-12 14:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-13 4:01 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3, v2] drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query vram fused min, max frequency Sujaritha Sundaresan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPJLIlS7K7ey17kL@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.