From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>, Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:30:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPUJHAKzxvXiEDYA@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <642de4e6-801d-fcad-a7ce-bfc6dec3b6e5@linux.dev>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:11:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> On 8/29/23 19:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:46:13PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > On 8/28/23 05:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > > > From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a boolean parameter for file_accessed() to support nowait semantics.
> > > > > Currently it is true only with io_uring as its initial caller.
> > > >
> > > > So why do we need to do this as part of this series? Apparently it
> > > > hasn't caused any problems for filemap_read().
> > > >
> > >
> > > We need this parameter to indicate if nowait semantics should be enforced in
> > > touch_atime(), There are locks and maybe IOs in it.
> >
> > That's not my point. We currently call file_accessed() and
> > touch_atime() for nowait reads and nowait writes. You haven't done
> > anything to fix those.
> >
> > I suspect you can trim this patchset down significantly by avoiding
> > fixing the file_accessed() problem. And then come back with a later
> > patchset that fixes it for all nowait i/o. Or do a separate prep series
>
> I'm ok to do that.
>
> > first that fixes it for the existing nowait users, and then a second
> > series to do all the directory stuff.
> >
> > I'd do the first thing. Just ignore the problem. Directory atime
> > updates cause I/O so rarely that you can afford to ignore it. Almost
> > everyone uses relatime or nodiratime.
>
> Hi Matthew,
> The previous discussion shows this does cause issues in real
> producations: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/2785f009-2ebb-028d-8250-d5f3a30510f0@gmail.com/#:~:text=fwiw%2C%20we%27ve%20just%20recently%20had%20similar%20problems%20with%20io_uring%20read/write
>
Then separate it out into it's own patch set so we can have a
discussion on the merits of requiring using noatime, relatime or
lazytime for really latency sensitive IO applications. Changing code
is not always the right solution...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>, Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:30:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPUJHAKzxvXiEDYA@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <642de4e6-801d-fcad-a7ce-bfc6dec3b6e5@linux.dev>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:11:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> On 8/29/23 19:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:46:13PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > On 8/28/23 05:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > > > From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a boolean parameter for file_accessed() to support nowait semantics.
> > > > > Currently it is true only with io_uring as its initial caller.
> > > >
> > > > So why do we need to do this as part of this series? Apparently it
> > > > hasn't caused any problems for filemap_read().
> > > >
> > >
> > > We need this parameter to indicate if nowait semantics should be enforced in
> > > touch_atime(), There are locks and maybe IOs in it.
> >
> > That's not my point. We currently call file_accessed() and
> > touch_atime() for nowait reads and nowait writes. You haven't done
> > anything to fix those.
> >
> > I suspect you can trim this patchset down significantly by avoiding
> > fixing the file_accessed() problem. And then come back with a later
> > patchset that fixes it for all nowait i/o. Or do a separate prep series
>
> I'm ok to do that.
>
> > first that fixes it for the existing nowait users, and then a second
> > series to do all the directory stuff.
> >
> > I'd do the first thing. Just ignore the problem. Directory atime
> > updates cause I/O so rarely that you can afford to ignore it. Almost
> > everyone uses relatime or nodiratime.
>
> Hi Matthew,
> The previous discussion shows this does cause issues in real
> producations: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/2785f009-2ebb-028d-8250-d5f3a30510f0@gmail.com/#:~:text=fwiw%2C%20we%27ve%20just%20recently%20had%20similar%20problems%20with%20io_uring%20read/write
>
Then separate it out into it's own patch set so we can have a
discussion on the merits of requiring using noatime, relatime or
lazytime for really latency sensitive IO applications. Changing code
is not always the right solution...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>, Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:30:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPUJHAKzxvXiEDYA@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <642de4e6-801d-fcad-a7ce-bfc6dec3b6e5@linux.dev>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:11:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> On 8/29/23 19:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:46:13PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > On 8/28/23 05:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > > > From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a boolean parameter for file_accessed() to support nowait semantics.
> > > > > Currently it is true only with io_uring as its initial caller.
> > > >
> > > > So why do we need to do this as part of this series? Apparently it
> > > > hasn't caused any problems for filemap_read().
> > > >
> > >
> > > We need this parameter to indicate if nowait semantics should be enforced in
> > > touch_atime(), There are locks and maybe IOs in it.
> >
> > That's not my point. We currently call file_accessed() and
> > touch_atime() for nowait reads and nowait writes. You haven't done
> > anything to fix those.
> >
> > I suspect you can trim this patchset down significantly by avoiding
> > fixing the file_accessed() problem. And then come back with a later
> > patchset that fixes it for all nowait i/o. Or do a separate prep series
>
> I'm ok to do that.
>
> > first that fixes it for the existing nowait users, and then a second
> > series to do all the directory stuff.
> >
> > I'd do the first thing. Just ignore the problem. Directory atime
> > updates cause I/O so rarely that you can afford to ignore it. Almost
> > everyone uses relatime or nodiratime.
>
> Hi Matthew,
> The previous discussion shows this does cause issues in real
> producations: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/2785f009-2ebb-028d-8250-d5f3a30510f0@gmail.com/#:~:text=fwiw%2C%20we%27ve%20just%20recently%20had%20similar%20problems%20with%20io_uring%20read/write
>
Then separate it out into it's own patch set so we can have a
discussion on the merits of requiring using noatime, relatime or
lazytime for really latency sensitive IO applications. Changing code
is not always the right solution...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>, Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourcefo
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:30:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPUJHAKzxvXiEDYA@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <642de4e6-801d-fcad-a7ce-bfc6dec3b6e5@linux.dev>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:11:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> On 8/29/23 19:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:46:13PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > On 8/28/23 05:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > > > From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a boolean parameter for file_accessed() to support nowait semantics.
> > > > > Currently it is true only with io_uring as its initial caller.
> > > >
> > > > So why do we need to do this as part of this series? Apparently it
> > > > hasn't caused any problems for filemap_read().
> > > >
> > >
> > > We need this parameter to indicate if nowait semantics should be enforced in
> > > touch_atime(), There are locks and maybe IOs in it.
> >
> > That's not my point. We currently call file_accessed() and
> > touch_atime() for nowait reads and nowait writes. You haven't done
> > anything to fix those.
> >
> > I suspect you can trim this patchset down significantly by avoiding
> > fixing the file_accessed() problem. And then come back with a later
> > patchset that fixes it for all nowait i/o. Or do a separate prep series
>
> I'm ok to do that.
>
> > first that fixes it for the existing nowait users, and then a second
> > series to do all the directory stuff.
> >
> > I'd do the first thing. Just ignore the problem. Directory atime
> > updates cause I/O so rarely that you can afford to ignore it. Almost
> > everyone uses relatime or nodiratime.
>
> Hi Matthew,
> The previous discussion shows this does cause issues in real
> producations: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/2785f009-2ebb-028d-8250-d5f3a30510f0@gmail.com/#:~:text=fwiw%2C%20we%27ve%20just%20recently%20had%20similar%20problems%20with%20io_uring%20read/write
>
Then separate it out into it's own patch set so we can have a
discussion on the merits of requiring using noatime, relatime or
lazytime for really latency sensitive IO applications. Changing code
is not always the right solution...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>, Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:30:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPUJHAKzxvXiEDYA@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <642de4e6-801d-fcad-a7ce-bfc6dec3b6e5@linux.dev>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:11:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> On 8/29/23 19:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:46:13PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > On 8/28/23 05:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > > > From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a boolean parameter for file_accessed() to support nowait semantics.
> > > > > Currently it is true only with io_uring as its initial caller.
> > > >
> > > > So why do we need to do this as part of this series? Apparently it
> > > > hasn't caused any problems for filemap_read().
> > > >
> > >
> > > We need this parameter to indicate if nowait semantics should be enforced in
> > > touch_atime(), There are locks and maybe IOs in it.
> >
> > That's not my point. We currently call file_accessed() and
> > touch_atime() for nowait reads and nowait writes. You haven't done
> > anything to fix those.
> >
> > I suspect you can trim this patchset down significantly by avoiding
> > fixing the file_accessed() problem. And then come back with a later
> > patchset that fixes it for all nowait i/o. Or do a separate prep series
>
> I'm ok to do that.
>
> > first that fixes it for the existing nowait users, and then a second
> > series to do all the directory stuff.
> >
> > I'd do the first thing. Just ignore the problem. Directory atime
> > updates cause I/O so rarely that you can afford to ignore it. Almost
> > everyone uses relatime or nodiratime.
>
> Hi Matthew,
> The previous discussion shows this does cause issues in real
> producations: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/2785f009-2ebb-028d-8250-d5f3a30510f0@gmail.com/#:~:text=fwiw%2C%20we%27ve%20just%20recently%20had%20similar%20problems%20with%20io_uring%20read/write
>
Then separate it out into it's own patch set so we can have a
discussion on the merits of requiring using noatime, relatime or
lazytime for really latency sensitive IO applications. Changing code
is not always the right solution...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-03 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 140+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-27 13:28 [PATCH v6 00/11] io_uring getdents Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs: split off vfs_getdents function of getdents64 syscall Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: add NOWAIT semantics for readdir Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 20:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:44 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:44 ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 7:41 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:41 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:41 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:41 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:41 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-29 13:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 13:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 13:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 13:05 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 13:05 ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-04 1:02 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-04 1:02 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-04 1:02 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-04 1:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Dave Chinner via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-09-04 1:02 ` [Cluster-devel] " Dave Chinner
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] vfs: add nowait flag for struct dir_context Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] vfs: add a vfs helper for io_uring file pos lock Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 20:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:47 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:47 ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] vfs: add file_pos_unlock() for io_uring usage Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 06/11] vfs: add a nowait parameter for touch_atime() Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed() Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 21:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 21:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 21:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 21:32 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 21:32 ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 7:46 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:46 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:46 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:46 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-29 7:46 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-29 11:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 11:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 11:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 11:53 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 11:53 ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-30 6:11 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-30 6:11 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-30 6:11 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-30 6:11 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-30 6:11 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-03 22:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Dave Chinner via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-09-03 22:30 ` [Cluster-devel] " Dave Chinner
2023-09-08 0:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-08 0:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-08 0:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-08 0:29 ` [f2fs-dev] " Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-08 0:29 ` [Cluster-devel] " Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-10 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-10 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-10 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-10 22:01 ` [f2fs-dev] " Dave Chinner via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-09-10 22:01 ` [Cluster-devel] " Dave Chinner
2023-09-04 9:51 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:51 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:51 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:51 ` [Cluster-devel] " Christian Brauner
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfs: move file_accessed() to the beginning of iterate_dir() Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfs: error out -EAGAIN if atime needs to be updated Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 20:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 20:51 ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfs: trylock inode->i_rwsem in iterate_dir() to support nowait Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-09-04 9:37 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:37 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:37 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:37 ` [f2fs-dev] " Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:37 ` [Cluster-devel] " Christian Brauner
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 11/11] io_uring: add support for getdents Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [Cluster-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-09-04 9:57 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] io_uring getdents Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:57 ` [f2fs-dev] " Christian Brauner
2023-09-04 9:57 ` [Cluster-devel] " Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPUJHAKzxvXiEDYA@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bugs@claycon.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hao.xu@linux.dev \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.