From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
To: Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@jfarr.cc>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, dhowells@redhat.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86/kexec: UKI support
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:48:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQLI92sQrnTC9Wel@gardel-login> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9580df76-c143-4077-8a39-b1fcc0ed37bd@app.fastmail.com>
On Di, 12.09.23 17:32, Jan Hendrik Farr (kernel@jfarr.cc) wrote:
> >> The format itself is rather simple. It's just a PE file (as required
> >> by the UEFI spec) that contains a small stub application in the .text,
> >> .data, etc sections that is responsible for invoking the contained
> >> kernel and initrd with the contained cmdline. The kernel image is
> >> placed into a .kernel section, the initrd into a .initrd section, and
> >> the cmdline into a .cmdline section in the PE executable.
> >
> > How does this interact with the existing EFI stub support in
> > linux?
>
> It doesn't. During normal boot of a UKI the stub in it is used
> (systemd-stub, see:
> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-stub.html). The
> kernel's own EFI stub will still be in the binary inside the .linux
> section but not used.
That's not true actually, if the inner kernel supports the EFI stub
then systemd-stub actually defers to that for kernel execution. It's
more portable that way, since the kernel then deals with the
differences in the boot protocol on different architectures.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
To: Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@jfarr.cc>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, dhowells@redhat.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86/kexec: UKI support
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:48:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQLI92sQrnTC9Wel@gardel-login> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9580df76-c143-4077-8a39-b1fcc0ed37bd@app.fastmail.com>
On Di, 12.09.23 17:32, Jan Hendrik Farr (kernel@jfarr.cc) wrote:
> >> The format itself is rather simple. It's just a PE file (as required
> >> by the UEFI spec) that contains a small stub application in the .text,
> >> .data, etc sections that is responsible for invoking the contained
> >> kernel and initrd with the contained cmdline. The kernel image is
> >> placed into a .kernel section, the initrd into a .initrd section, and
> >> the cmdline into a .cmdline section in the PE executable.
> >
> > How does this interact with the existing EFI stub support in
> > linux?
>
> It doesn't. During normal boot of a UKI the stub in it is used
> (systemd-stub, see:
> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-stub.html). The
> kernel's own EFI stub will still be in the binary inside the .linux
> section but not used.
That's not true actually, if the inner kernel supports the EFI stub
then systemd-stub actually defers to that for kernel execution. It's
more portable that way, since the kernel then deals with the
differences in the boot protocol on different architectures.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-09 16:18 [PATCH 0/1] x86/kexec: UKI support Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-09 16:18 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-09 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-09 16:18 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-09 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Luca Boccassi
2023-09-09 17:15 ` Luca Boccassi
2023-09-09 17:57 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-09 17:57 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-09 18:10 ` Luca Boccassi
2023-09-09 18:10 ` Luca Boccassi
2023-09-11 3:23 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-11 3:23 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-11 22:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-11 22:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-11 22:54 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-11 22:54 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 10:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-12 10:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-12 15:32 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 15:32 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 17:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-12 17:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-12 18:56 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 18:56 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 19:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-12 19:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-12 19:38 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 19:38 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 20:49 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-12 20:49 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-13 14:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13 14:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13 15:07 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-13 15:07 ` Jan Hendrik Farr
2023-09-13 15:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13 15:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-14 9:11 ` Lennart Poettering
2023-09-14 9:11 ` Lennart Poettering
2023-09-14 12:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-14 12:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-14 8:48 ` Lennart Poettering [this message]
2023-09-14 8:48 ` Lennart Poettering
2023-09-14 11:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-14 11:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-11 23:20 ` [systemd-devel] " Neal Gompa
2023-09-11 23:20 ` Neal Gompa
2023-09-12 10:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-12 10:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-18 15:41 ` Dimitri John Ledkov
2023-09-18 15:41 ` Dimitri John Ledkov
2023-09-25 16:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-25 16:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQLI92sQrnTC9Wel@gardel-login \
--to=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@jfarr.cc \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.