Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] dt-bindings: usb: tps6598x: Add tps25750

[Abdel Alkuo <alkuor@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 07:30:52PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/09/2023 17:26, Abdel Alkuor wrote:
> > From: Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@geotab.com>
> > 
> > TPS25750 is USB TypeC PD controller which is a subset of TPS6598x.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@geotab.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml  | 70 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> > index 5497a60cddbc..e49bd92b5276 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ properties:
> >      enum:
> >        - ti,tps6598x
> >        - apple,cd321x
> > +      - ti,tps25750
> > +
> >    reg:
> >      maxItems: 1
> >  
> > @@ -32,10 +34,45 @@ properties:
> >      items:
> >        - const: irq
> >  
> > +  firmware-name:
> > +    description: |
> > +      Should contain the name of the default patch binary
> > +      file located on the firmware search path which is
> > +      used to switch the controller into APP mode.
> > +      This is used when tps25750 doesn't have an EEPROM
> > +      connected to it.
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  ti,patch-address:
> > +    description: |
> > +      One of PBMs command data field is I2C slave address
> > +      which is used when writing the patch for TPS25750.
> > +      The slave address can be any value except 0x00, 0x20,
> > +      0x21, 0x22, and 0x23
> 
> Why this cannot be another entry in the reg?
> 
This address is different than the physical address of PD controller.
The patch address will be used instead of PD controller address when
writing the patch. I thought reg proprity is only for a device physical
address, should I add another entry in the reg property in this case?
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint8
> > +    minimum: 1
> > +    maximum: 0x7e
> > +
> >  required:
> >    - compatible
> >    - reg
> >  
> > +allOf:
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            const: ti,tps25750
> > +    then:
> > +      required:
> > +        - ti,patch-address
> > +        - connector
> 
> 
> Why? Connector should be required or not required for both devices. What
> is different between them?
> 
The data-role for tps6598x can be extracted from system config register
which it doesn't exist in tps25750, so the only way to extract
this information is by using data-role property from the Connector for
tps25750, hence Connector and data-role are set as required for
tps25750.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Abdel