From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, corbet@lwn.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org,
vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] ice: dpll: implement phase related callbacks
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR/+noRCdnsy6QJo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006114101.1608796-5-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:41:00PM +0200, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> Implement new callback ops related to measurment and adjustment of
> signal phase for pin-dpll in ice driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Hi Arkadiusz,
some minor feedback from my side.
If you do end up re-spinning the series, please consider
running checkpatch.pl --codespell.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.h | 10 +-
> 2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
...
> +/**
> + * ice_dpll_phase_offset_get - callback for get dpll phase shift value
> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
> + * @pin_priv: private data pointer passed on pin registration
> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
> + * @dpll_priv: private data pointer passed on dpll registration
> + * @phase_adjust: on success holds pin phase_adjust value
nit: The parameter is called phase_offset, not phase_adjust in the code below
> + * @extack: error reporting
> + *
> + * Dpll subsystem callback. Handler for getting phase shift value between
> + * dpll's input and output.
> + *
> + * Context: Acquires pf->dplls.lock
> + * Return:
> + * * 0 - success
> + * * negative - error
> + */
> +static int
> +ice_dpll_phase_offset_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
> + const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
> + s64 *phase_offset, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct ice_dpll *d = dpll_priv;
> + struct ice_pf *pf = d->pf;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pf->dplls.lock);
> + if (d->active_input == pin)
> + *phase_offset = d->phase_offset * ICE_DPLL_PHASE_OFFSET_FACTOR;
> + else
> + *phase_offset = 0;
> + mutex_unlock(&pf->dplls.lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * ice_dpll_rclk_state_on_pin_set - set a state on rclk pin
> * @pin: pointer to a pin
...
> @@ -1656,6 +1867,15 @@ ice_dpll_init_info_direct_pins(struct ice_pf *pf,
> return ret;
> pins[i].prop.capabilities |=
> DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_PRIORITY_CAN_CHANGE;
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.min =
> + pf->dplls.input_phase_adj_max;
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.max =
> + -pf->dplls.input_phase_adj_max;
> + } else {
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.min =
> + pf->dplls.output_phase_adj_max,
nit: It probably doesn't make any difference, but perhaps ',' should be ';'.
As flagged by clang-16 with -Wcomma
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.max =
> + -pf->dplls.output_phase_adj_max;
> }
> pins[i].prop.capabilities |=
> DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_STATE_CAN_CHANGE;
...
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
jiri@resnulli.us, corbet@lwn.net, davem@davemloft.net,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] ice: dpll: implement phase related callbacks
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR/+noRCdnsy6QJo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006114101.1608796-5-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:41:00PM +0200, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> Implement new callback ops related to measurment and adjustment of
> signal phase for pin-dpll in ice driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Hi Arkadiusz,
some minor feedback from my side.
If you do end up re-spinning the series, please consider
running checkpatch.pl --codespell.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.h | 10 +-
> 2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
...
> +/**
> + * ice_dpll_phase_offset_get - callback for get dpll phase shift value
> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
> + * @pin_priv: private data pointer passed on pin registration
> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
> + * @dpll_priv: private data pointer passed on dpll registration
> + * @phase_adjust: on success holds pin phase_adjust value
nit: The parameter is called phase_offset, not phase_adjust in the code below
> + * @extack: error reporting
> + *
> + * Dpll subsystem callback. Handler for getting phase shift value between
> + * dpll's input and output.
> + *
> + * Context: Acquires pf->dplls.lock
> + * Return:
> + * * 0 - success
> + * * negative - error
> + */
> +static int
> +ice_dpll_phase_offset_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
> + const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
> + s64 *phase_offset, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct ice_dpll *d = dpll_priv;
> + struct ice_pf *pf = d->pf;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pf->dplls.lock);
> + if (d->active_input == pin)
> + *phase_offset = d->phase_offset * ICE_DPLL_PHASE_OFFSET_FACTOR;
> + else
> + *phase_offset = 0;
> + mutex_unlock(&pf->dplls.lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * ice_dpll_rclk_state_on_pin_set - set a state on rclk pin
> * @pin: pointer to a pin
...
> @@ -1656,6 +1867,15 @@ ice_dpll_init_info_direct_pins(struct ice_pf *pf,
> return ret;
> pins[i].prop.capabilities |=
> DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_PRIORITY_CAN_CHANGE;
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.min =
> + pf->dplls.input_phase_adj_max;
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.max =
> + -pf->dplls.input_phase_adj_max;
> + } else {
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.min =
> + pf->dplls.output_phase_adj_max,
nit: It probably doesn't make any difference, but perhaps ',' should be ';'.
As flagged by clang-16 with -Wcomma
> + pins[i].prop.phase_range.max =
> + -pf->dplls.output_phase_adj_max;
> }
> pins[i].prop.capabilities |=
> DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_STATE_CAN_CHANGE;
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-06 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-06 11:40 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] dpll: add phase-offset and phase-adjust Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:40 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] dpll: docs: add support for pin signal phase offset/adjust Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:40 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] dpll: spec: add support for pin-dpll " Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:40 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 12:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 12:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 14:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-06 14:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-06 16:53 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 16:53 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 19:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kuba Kicinski
2023-10-06 19:44 ` Kuba Kicinski
2023-10-07 10:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-10-07 10:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-09 15:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-09 15:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-09 22:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-10-09 22:55 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-10-06 11:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] dpll: netlink/core: " Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:40 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 12:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 12:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-09 22:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-10-09 22:49 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-10-06 11:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] ice: dpll: implement phase related callbacks Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:41 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 12:33 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-10-06 12:33 ` Simon Horman
2023-10-06 12:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 12:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 11:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] dpll: netlink/core: change pin frequency set behavior Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 11:41 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2023-10-06 12:35 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2023-10-06 12:35 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZR/+noRCdnsy6QJo@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.