* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-22 14:39 ` Jian Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jian Zhang @ 2023-09-22 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley
Cc: Tommy Huang, brendan.higgins, benh, andrew, zhangjian3032,
yulei.sh, xiexinnan, open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
> From: "Joel Stanley"<joel@jms.id.au>
> Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 14:48
> Subject: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
> To: "Jian Zhang"<zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>, "Tommy Huang"<tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com>
> Cc: <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <andrew@aj.id.au>, <zhangjian3032@gmail.com>, <yulei.sh@bytedance.com>, <xiexinnan@bytedance.com>, "open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER"<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER"<openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"<linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>, "open list"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 07:22, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > When the `CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE` option is enabled and the device operates
> > as a slave, a situation arises where the master sends a START signal
> > without the accompanying STOP signal. This action results in a
> > persistent I2C bus timeout. The core issue stems from the fact that
> > the i2c controller remains in a slave read state without a timeout
> > mechanism. As a consequence, the bus perpetually experiences timeouts.
> >
> > This proposed patch addresses this problem by introducing a status
> > check during i2c transmit timeouts. In the event that the controller
> > is in a slave read state, the i2c controller will be reset to restore
> > proper functionality and allow the I2C bus to resume normal operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
>
> Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com/
>
> His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> re-parsing the device tree (!).
>
> Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> confirm that his change fixes your issue?
I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
missing the action
`bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm this?
Thanks,
Jian
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > index e76befe3f60f..1a95205fc946 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_RX_CMD | \
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_TX_CMD | \
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_START_CMD)
> > +#define ASPEED_I2CD_SLAVE_CMDS_MASK GENMASK(31, 29)
> >
> > /* 0x18 : I2CD Slave Device Address Register */
> > #define ASPEED_I2CD_DEV_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(6, 0)
> > @@ -706,6 +707,22 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_BUSY_STS))
> > aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
> > + /*
> > + * If master timed out and bus is in slave mode.
> > + * reset the slave mode.
> > + */
> > + if (readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) & ASPEED_I2CD_SLAVE_CMDS_MASK) {
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
> > + u32 func_ctrl_reg_val = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > +
> > + writel(0, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > + writel(func_ctrl_reg_val, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > + bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /*
> > * If timed out and the state is still pending, drop the pending
> > * master command.
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-22 14:39 ` Jian Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jian Zhang @ 2023-09-22 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley
Cc: moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, andrew,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, yulei.sh, open list,
open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, brendan.higgins, Tommy Huang,
zhangjian3032, moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
xiexinnan
> From: "Joel Stanley"<joel@jms.id.au>
> Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 14:48
> Subject: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
> To: "Jian Zhang"<zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>, "Tommy Huang"<tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com>
> Cc: <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <andrew@aj.id.au>, <zhangjian3032@gmail.com>, <yulei.sh@bytedance.com>, <xiexinnan@bytedance.com>, "open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER"<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER"<openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"<linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>, "open list"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 07:22, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > When the `CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE` option is enabled and the device operates
> > as a slave, a situation arises where the master sends a START signal
> > without the accompanying STOP signal. This action results in a
> > persistent I2C bus timeout. The core issue stems from the fact that
> > the i2c controller remains in a slave read state without a timeout
> > mechanism. As a consequence, the bus perpetually experiences timeouts.
> >
> > This proposed patch addresses this problem by introducing a status
> > check during i2c transmit timeouts. In the event that the controller
> > is in a slave read state, the i2c controller will be reset to restore
> > proper functionality and allow the I2C bus to resume normal operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
>
> Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com/
>
> His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> re-parsing the device tree (!).
>
> Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> confirm that his change fixes your issue?
I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
missing the action
`bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm this?
Thanks,
Jian
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > index e76befe3f60f..1a95205fc946 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_RX_CMD | \
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_TX_CMD | \
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_START_CMD)
> > +#define ASPEED_I2CD_SLAVE_CMDS_MASK GENMASK(31, 29)
> >
> > /* 0x18 : I2CD Slave Device Address Register */
> > #define ASPEED_I2CD_DEV_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(6, 0)
> > @@ -706,6 +707,22 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_BUSY_STS))
> > aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
> > + /*
> > + * If master timed out and bus is in slave mode.
> > + * reset the slave mode.
> > + */
> > + if (readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) & ASPEED_I2CD_SLAVE_CMDS_MASK) {
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
> > + u32 func_ctrl_reg_val = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > +
> > + writel(0, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > + writel(func_ctrl_reg_val, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > + bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /*
> > * If timed out and the state is still pending, drop the pending
> > * master command.
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-22 14:39 ` Jian Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jian Zhang @ 2023-09-22 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley
Cc: Tommy Huang, brendan.higgins, benh, andrew, zhangjian3032,
yulei.sh, xiexinnan, open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
> From: "Joel Stanley"<joel@jms.id.au>
> Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 14:48
> Subject: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
> To: "Jian Zhang"<zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>, "Tommy Huang"<tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com>
> Cc: <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <andrew@aj.id.au>, <zhangjian3032@gmail.com>, <yulei.sh@bytedance.com>, <xiexinnan@bytedance.com>, "open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER"<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER"<openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"<linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>, "open list"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 07:22, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > When the `CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE` option is enabled and the device operates
> > as a slave, a situation arises where the master sends a START signal
> > without the accompanying STOP signal. This action results in a
> > persistent I2C bus timeout. The core issue stems from the fact that
> > the i2c controller remains in a slave read state without a timeout
> > mechanism. As a consequence, the bus perpetually experiences timeouts.
> >
> > This proposed patch addresses this problem by introducing a status
> > check during i2c transmit timeouts. In the event that the controller
> > is in a slave read state, the i2c controller will be reset to restore
> > proper functionality and allow the I2C bus to resume normal operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
>
> Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com/
>
> His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> re-parsing the device tree (!).
>
> Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> confirm that his change fixes your issue?
I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
missing the action
`bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm this?
Thanks,
Jian
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > index e76befe3f60f..1a95205fc946 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
> > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_RX_CMD | \
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_TX_CMD | \
> > ASPEED_I2CD_M_START_CMD)
> > +#define ASPEED_I2CD_SLAVE_CMDS_MASK GENMASK(31, 29)
> >
> > /* 0x18 : I2CD Slave Device Address Register */
> > #define ASPEED_I2CD_DEV_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(6, 0)
> > @@ -706,6 +707,22 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_BUSY_STS))
> > aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
> > + /*
> > + * If master timed out and bus is in slave mode.
> > + * reset the slave mode.
> > + */
> > + if (readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) & ASPEED_I2CD_SLAVE_CMDS_MASK) {
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
> > + u32 func_ctrl_reg_val = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > +
> > + writel(0, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > + writel(func_ctrl_reg_val, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> > + bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /*
> > * If timed out and the state is still pending, drop the pending
> > * master command.
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
2023-09-22 14:39 ` Jian Zhang
(?)
(?)
@ 2023-09-27 2:42 ` Joel Stanley
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joel Stanley @ 2023-09-27 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-aspeed
On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_huang at aspeedtech.com/
> >
> > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> >
> > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
>
> I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> missing the action
> `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm this?
You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
now been merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix,
or revert it asap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 2:42 ` Joel Stanley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joel Stanley @ 2023-09-27 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jian Zhang
Cc: Tommy Huang, brendan.higgins, benh, andrew, zhangjian3032,
yulei.sh, xiexinnan, open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com/
> >
> > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> >
> > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
>
> I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> missing the action
> `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm this?
You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
now been merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix,
or revert it asap.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 2:42 ` Joel Stanley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joel Stanley @ 2023-09-27 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jian Zhang
Cc: moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, andrew,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, yulei.sh, open list,
open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, brendan.higgins, Tommy Huang,
zhangjian3032, moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
xiexinnan
On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com/
> >
> > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> >
> > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
>
> I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> missing the action
> `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm this?
You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
now been merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix,
or revert it asap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 2:42 ` Joel Stanley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joel Stanley @ 2023-09-27 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jian Zhang
Cc: Tommy Huang, brendan.higgins, benh, andrew, zhangjian3032,
yulei.sh, xiexinnan, open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com/
> >
> > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> >
> > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
>
> I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> missing the action
> `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm this?
You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
now been merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix,
or revert it asap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
2023-09-27 2:42 ` Joel Stanley
(?)
(?)
@ 2023-09-27 3:24 ` Tommy Huang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tommy Huang @ 2023-09-27 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-aspeed
Hi Joel / Jian,
Sorry ~ I didn't observe the last mail from Jian.
My last patch was used to avoid the situation like below link.
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2023-August/033756.html
Because I have applied controller reset in my patch.
Therefore, I think you just need to reset the slave state by "bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE" in your case.
BR,
by Tommy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:43 AM
> To: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> Cc: Tommy Huang <tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com>;
> brendan.higgins at linux.dev; benh at kernel.crashing.org; andrew at aj.id.au;
> zhangjian3032 at gmail.com; yulei.sh at bytedance.com;
> xiexinnan at bytedance.com; open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT
> <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED
> MACHINE SUPPORT <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>; open list
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
>
> On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_hua
> > > ng at aspeedtech.com/
> > >
> > > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> > >
> > > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
> >
> > I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> > missing the action `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> > which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm
> this?
>
> You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
>
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has now been
> merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix, or revert it
> asap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* RE: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 3:24 ` Tommy Huang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tommy Huang @ 2023-09-27 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley, Jian Zhang
Cc: brendan.higgins@linux.dev, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
andrew@aj.id.au, zhangjian3032@gmail.com, yulei.sh@bytedance.com,
xiexinnan@bytedance.com, open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
Hi Joel / Jian,
Sorry ~ I didn't observe the last mail from Jian.
My last patch was used to avoid the situation like below link.
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2023-August/033756.html
Because I have applied controller reset in my patch.
Therefore, I think you just need to reset the slave state by "bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE" in your case.
BR,
by Tommy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:43 AM
> To: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> Cc: Tommy Huang <tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com>;
> brendan.higgins@linux.dev; benh@kernel.crashing.org; andrew@aj.id.au;
> zhangjian3032@gmail.com; yulei.sh@bytedance.com;
> xiexinnan@bytedance.com; open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT
> <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED
> MACHINE SUPPORT <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>; open list
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
>
> On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_hua
> > > ng@aspeedtech.com/
> > >
> > > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> > >
> > > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
> >
> > I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> > missing the action `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> > which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm
> this?
>
> You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
>
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has now been
> merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix, or revert it
> asap.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* RE: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 3:24 ` Tommy Huang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tommy Huang @ 2023-09-27 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley, Jian Zhang
Cc: moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, andrew@aj.id.au,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, yulei.sh@bytedance.com,
open list, brendan.higgins@linux.dev,
open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, zhangjian3032@gmail.com,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
xiexinnan@bytedance.com
Hi Joel / Jian,
Sorry ~ I didn't observe the last mail from Jian.
My last patch was used to avoid the situation like below link.
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2023-August/033756.html
Because I have applied controller reset in my patch.
Therefore, I think you just need to reset the slave state by "bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE" in your case.
BR,
by Tommy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:43 AM
> To: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> Cc: Tommy Huang <tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com>;
> brendan.higgins@linux.dev; benh@kernel.crashing.org; andrew@aj.id.au;
> zhangjian3032@gmail.com; yulei.sh@bytedance.com;
> xiexinnan@bytedance.com; open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT
> <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED
> MACHINE SUPPORT <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>; open list
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
>
> On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_hua
> > > ng@aspeedtech.com/
> > >
> > > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> > >
> > > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
> >
> > I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> > missing the action `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> > which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm
> this?
>
> You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
>
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has now been
> merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix, or revert it
> asap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* RE: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 3:24 ` Tommy Huang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tommy Huang @ 2023-09-27 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley, Jian Zhang
Cc: brendan.higgins@linux.dev, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
andrew@aj.id.au, zhangjian3032@gmail.com, yulei.sh@bytedance.com,
xiexinnan@bytedance.com, open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
Hi Joel / Jian,
Sorry ~ I didn't observe the last mail from Jian.
My last patch was used to avoid the situation like below link.
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2023-August/033756.html
Because I have applied controller reset in my patch.
Therefore, I think you just need to reset the slave state by "bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE" in your case.
BR,
by Tommy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:43 AM
> To: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> Cc: Tommy Huang <tommy_huang@aspeedtech.com>;
> brendan.higgins@linux.dev; benh@kernel.crashing.org; andrew@aj.id.au;
> zhangjian3032@gmail.com; yulei.sh@bytedance.com;
> xiexinnan@bytedance.com; open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER
> <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT
> <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; moderated list:ARM/ASPEED
> MACHINE SUPPORT <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>; open list
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
>
> On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tommy has submitted a similar fix:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20230906004910.4157305-1-tommy_hua
> > > ng@aspeedtech.com/
> > >
> > > His change is very heavy handed; it reinitialises the bus including
> > > re-parsing the device tree (!).
> > >
> > > Should we have merged this fix instead? If not, are you able to
> > > confirm that his change fixes your issue?
> >
> > I feel it's for solving the same issue, but I think this patch is
> > missing the action `bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE;`,
> > which means it can't resolve my problem. @Tommy, can you help confirm
> this?
>
> You're right, it doesn't change the slave_state at all.
>
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has now been
> merged and backported to stable. We should complete the fix, or revert it
> asap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
2023-09-27 2:42 ` Joel Stanley
(?)
(?)
@ 2023-09-27 6:18 ` Wolfram Sang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-09-27 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-aspeed
Hi Joel!
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
> now been merged and backported to stable.
To explain my reasoning: given the list of unreviewed patches for
aspeed[1], I thought that the driver maintainers were busy or similar.
This happens all the time, so it would be no surprise. Andi is the
driver-comaintainer meanwhile, so an ack from him counts for me as well.
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=aspeed&archive=&delegate=
> We should complete the fix, or revert it asap.
Agreed. We can always revert if you guys need more time fixing the issue
properly.
Thanks,
Wolfram
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-aspeed/attachments/20230927/b51529bd/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 6:18 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-09-27 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley
Cc: Jian Zhang, Tommy Huang, brendan.higgins, benh, andrew,
zhangjian3032, yulei.sh, xiexinnan,
open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 669 bytes --]
Hi Joel!
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
> now been merged and backported to stable.
To explain my reasoning: given the list of unreviewed patches for
aspeed[1], I thought that the driver maintainers were busy or similar.
This happens all the time, so it would be no surprise. Andi is the
driver-comaintainer meanwhile, so an ack from him counts for me as well.
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=aspeed&archive=&delegate=
> We should complete the fix, or revert it asap.
Agreed. We can always revert if you guys need more time fixing the issue
properly.
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 6:18 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-09-27 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley
Cc: moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, andrew,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, yulei.sh, open list,
open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER, brendan.higgins, Jian Zhang,
Tommy Huang, zhangjian3032,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, xiexinnan
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 669 bytes --]
Hi Joel!
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
> now been merged and backported to stable.
To explain my reasoning: given the list of unreviewed patches for
aspeed[1], I thought that the driver maintainers were busy or similar.
This happens all the time, so it would be no surprise. Andi is the
driver-comaintainer meanwhile, so an ack from him counts for me as well.
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=aspeed&archive=&delegate=
> We should complete the fix, or revert it asap.
Agreed. We can always revert if you guys need more time fixing the issue
properly.
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Fix i2c bus hang in slave read
@ 2023-09-27 6:18 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2023-09-27 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley
Cc: Jian Zhang, Tommy Huang, brendan.higgins, benh, andrew,
zhangjian3032, yulei.sh, xiexinnan,
open list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED I2C DRIVER,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT,
moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT, open list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 669 bytes --]
Hi Joel!
> Unfortunately, despite no acks from the maintainers, this patch has
> now been merged and backported to stable.
To explain my reasoning: given the list of unreviewed patches for
aspeed[1], I thought that the driver maintainers were busy or similar.
This happens all the time, so it would be no surprise. Andi is the
driver-comaintainer meanwhile, so an ack from him counts for me as well.
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=aspeed&archive=&delegate=
> We should complete the fix, or revert it asap.
Agreed. We can always revert if you guys need more time fixing the issue
properly.
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread