From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>,
kherbst@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, dakr@redhat.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix kernel-doc warning
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 21:11:04 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSK4eNUPYIqPF3fM@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231008070618.20640-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2128 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 12:36:18PM +0530, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote:
> @@ -458,15 +458,15 @@ struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind {
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM, struct drm_nouveau_getparam)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC, struct drm_nouveau_channel_alloc)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_svm_init)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND, struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, struct drm_nouveau_gem_new)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_vm_init)
Can you please split checkpatch fix above into separate patch?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>,
kherbst@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, dakr@redhat.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix kernel-doc warning
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 21:11:04 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSK4eNUPYIqPF3fM@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231008070618.20640-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2128 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 12:36:18PM +0530, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote:
> @@ -458,15 +458,15 @@ struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind {
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM, struct drm_nouveau_getparam)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC, struct drm_nouveau_channel_alloc)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_svm_init)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND, struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, struct drm_nouveau_gem_new)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_vm_init)
Can you please split checkpatch fix above into separate patch?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>,
kherbst@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, dakr@redhat.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix kernel-doc warning
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 21:11:04 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSK4eNUPYIqPF3fM@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231008070618.20640-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2128 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 12:36:18PM +0530, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote:
> @@ -458,15 +458,15 @@ struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind {
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM, struct drm_nouveau_getparam)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC, struct drm_nouveau_channel_alloc)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_svm_init)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND, struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, struct drm_nouveau_gem_new)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
>
> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_vm_init)
Can you please split checkpatch fix above into separate patch?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-08 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-08 7:06 [Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix kernel-doc warning Bragatheswaran Manickavel
2023-10-08 7:06 ` Bragatheswaran Manickavel
2023-10-08 7:06 ` Bragatheswaran Manickavel
2023-10-08 14:07 ` [Nouveau] " Randy Dunlap
2023-10-08 14:07 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-10-08 14:07 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-10-08 14:11 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2023-10-08 14:11 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-10-08 14:11 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-10-08 15:04 ` [Nouveau] " Bragatheswaran Manickavel
2023-10-08 15:04 ` Bragatheswaran Manickavel
2023-10-08 15:04 ` Bragatheswaran Manickavel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSK4eNUPYIqPF3fM@debian.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=bragathemanick0908@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.