From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
To: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] batman-adv: Better half duplex penalty estimation
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 08:24:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSo0FgLjKTOmB_Gx@sellars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09c086e5e68055e52d1f92ba17d0e921084107e7.1695904299.git.repk@triplefau.lt>
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 02:39:36PM +0200, Remi Pommarel wrote:
> diff --git a/net/batman-adv/bat_v_ogm.c b/net/batman-adv/bat_v_ogm.c
> index 27597f4cdf3e..9b7d4de182d0 100644
> --- a/net/batman-adv/bat_v_ogm.c
> +++ b/net/batman-adv/bat_v_ogm.c
> @@ -866,10 +866,12 @@ static u32 batadv_v_get_throughput(struct batadv_ogm2_packet *ogm,
[...]
>
> - return min_t(u32, lth, oth);
> + /* OGM throughput was divided by two for retrocompatibility sake */
> + oth *= 2;
> + return oth * lth / (oth + lth);
Also looks like we'd have potential integer overflow issues
here as oth, lth and the return value are all u32.
In the worst case (oth + lth) could wrap around to 0 and we'd
divide by zero?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-14 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 12:39 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Better throughput estimation on half duplex interfaces Remi Pommarel
2023-09-28 12:39 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] batman-adv: Keep half duplex penalty on OGM receiving side also Remi Pommarel
2023-09-28 12:39 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] batman-adv: Better half duplex penalty estimation Remi Pommarel
2023-10-14 5:10 ` Linus Lüssing
2023-10-14 6:03 ` Linus Lüssing
2023-10-18 19:58 ` Remi Pommarel
2023-10-18 21:37 ` Nicolas Escande
2023-10-14 6:24 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2023-09-28 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] Better throughput estimation on half duplex interfaces Marek Lindner
2023-09-28 16:48 ` Remi Pommarel
2023-09-28 17:54 ` Remi Pommarel
2023-09-28 18:10 ` Marek Lindner
2023-09-28 19:16 ` Remi Pommarel
2023-10-03 21:06 ` Marek Lindner
2023-10-11 8:55 ` Remi Pommarel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSo0FgLjKTOmB_Gx@sellars \
--to=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=repk@triplefau.lt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.