From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com,
will@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Use folio for THP adjustment
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 10:47:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZT-Jw4SVJ6C1E6sc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <418313c5-2094-4aaf-ae43-a1f3bf8e936f@arm.com>
[...]
> > static struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops kvm_s2_mm_ops = {
> > .zalloc_page = stage2_memcache_zalloc_page,
> > .zalloc_pages_exact = kvm_s2_zalloc_pages_exact,
> > @@ -1274,7 +1229,7 @@ static bool fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> > *
> > * Returns the size of the mapping.
> > */
> > -static long
> > +static unsigned long
> > transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> > unsigned long hva, kvm_pfn_t *pfnp,
> > phys_addr_t *ipap)
> > @@ -1287,10 +1242,7 @@ transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> > * block map is contained within the memslot.
> > */
> > if (fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping(memslot, hva, PMD_SIZE)) {
> > - int sz = get_user_mapping_size(kvm, hva);
> > -
> > - if (sz < 0)
> > - return sz;
> > + size_t sz = folio_size(pfn_folio(pfn));
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry this is an extremely late reply - I just noticed this because Marc
> mentioned it in another thread.
>
> This doesn't look quite right to me; just because you have a folio of a given
> size, that doesn't mean the whole thing is mapped into this particular address
> space. For example, you could have a (PMD-sized) THP that gets partially
> munmapped - the folio is still PMD-sized but only some of it is mapped and
> should be accessible to the process. Or you could have a large file-backed folio
> (from a filesystem that supports large folios - e.g. XFS) but the application
> only mapped part of the file.
I thought originally this would break the block and the folio with it, but a
quick expriment showed it's not the case.
>
> Perhaps I've misunderstood and those edge cases can't happen here for some reason?
And fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping() would probably not be enough. we might
end-up with a portion unmapped at stage-1 but mapped at stage-2. :-(
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com,
will@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Use folio for THP adjustment
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 10:47:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZT-Jw4SVJ6C1E6sc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <418313c5-2094-4aaf-ae43-a1f3bf8e936f@arm.com>
[...]
> > static struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops kvm_s2_mm_ops = {
> > .zalloc_page = stage2_memcache_zalloc_page,
> > .zalloc_pages_exact = kvm_s2_zalloc_pages_exact,
> > @@ -1274,7 +1229,7 @@ static bool fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> > *
> > * Returns the size of the mapping.
> > */
> > -static long
> > +static unsigned long
> > transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> > unsigned long hva, kvm_pfn_t *pfnp,
> > phys_addr_t *ipap)
> > @@ -1287,10 +1242,7 @@ transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> > * block map is contained within the memslot.
> > */
> > if (fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping(memslot, hva, PMD_SIZE)) {
> > - int sz = get_user_mapping_size(kvm, hva);
> > -
> > - if (sz < 0)
> > - return sz;
> > + size_t sz = folio_size(pfn_folio(pfn));
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry this is an extremely late reply - I just noticed this because Marc
> mentioned it in another thread.
>
> This doesn't look quite right to me; just because you have a folio of a given
> size, that doesn't mean the whole thing is mapped into this particular address
> space. For example, you could have a (PMD-sized) THP that gets partially
> munmapped - the folio is still PMD-sized but only some of it is mapped and
> should be accessible to the process. Or you could have a large file-backed folio
> (from a filesystem that supports large folios - e.g. XFS) but the application
> only mapped part of the file.
I thought originally this would break the block and the folio with it, but a
quick expriment showed it's not the case.
>
> Perhaps I've misunderstood and those edge cases can't happen here for some reason?
And fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping() would probably not be enough. we might
end-up with a portion unmapped at stage-1 but mapped at stage-2. :-(
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-30 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 17:32 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Use folio for THP support Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-28 17:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: Do not transfer page refcount for THP adjustment Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-28 17:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-29 6:59 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-29 6:59 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-29 12:47 ` Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-29 12:47 ` Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Use folio " Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-28 17:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
2023-09-29 7:24 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-29 7:24 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-29 13:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-29 13:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-29 23:52 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-29 23:52 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-29 23:53 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-29 23:53 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-28 9:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-28 9:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-30 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-30 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-30 10:57 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-30 10:57 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-30 10:47 ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
2023-10-30 10:47 ` Vincent Donnefort
2023-10-30 11:01 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-30 11:01 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-09-29 9:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Use folio for THP support Marc Zyngier
2023-09-29 9:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-30 17:57 ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-30 17:57 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-30 20:16 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-30 20:16 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZT-Jw4SVJ6C1E6sc@google.com \
--to=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.