Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: rust: Enable Rust support for AArch64

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Jamie Cunliffe <Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	steve.capper@arm.com, Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: rust: Enable Rust support for AArch64
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 11:48:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTT+GMucKZ192yuv@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72=hpO8dP_B0=gOocCeaC-GDNQJx1MeA2HDZcEKDt4ZepA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 6:46 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > Miguel, Will acked this already so I think it's good to go. Do you plan
> > to pick both patches via the Rust tree?
> 
> Thanks for taking a look!
> 
> As you prefer -- ideally the changes for each architecture would go
> through their own trees (we are trying to get maintainers of the
> different parts of the kernel involved with Rust for their own bits
> and pieces), but if you think there is a reason to avoid that, I can
> also take them as fallback for the time being.

The main reason I asked was that the first patch touches x86 and none of
the x86 maintainers have been cc'ed or acked the patch. I thought
there's some deal that Rust-related changes go via you tree.

> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> 
> If you decide to take them:
> 
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> 
> I have boot tested it in aarch64 QEMU and saw the KUnit Rust tests
> passing and checked that the x86 side still works fine.

Thanks. I'll reply to the first patch and cc some x86 maintainers. I
assume your ack applies to the first patch as well.

-- 
Catalin