From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
will@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, trix@redhat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM IAS 15.x or newer
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:28:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTqFrf20z_RTB4sI@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231025183114.GA669177@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:31:14AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 07:01:53PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:21:28AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > A recent refactoring in the arm64 tree exposed an assembler bug in LLVM
> > > with regards to the generation of NOPs for arm64 big endian, resulting
> > > in near-immediate crashes on boot in QEMU.
> >
> > Could we please put a bit more detail into the commit message about what
> > exactly went wrong and how this was detected? I know that can be found
> > from the github links below, but having to go chase that is a bit of a
> > pain.
>
> Sure, sorry for leaving that out of the initial revision.
>
> > Would you be happy with the below? I've also added a Cc stable, since
> > this is a potential state corruption issue.
>
> That text looks much better to me, especially since it explains exactly
> what goes wrong here (which I was unsure of, this helps). Thanks a lot!
>
> Will / Catalin, would you like a v2 with that text or could it just be
> copied and pasted from Mark's mail during application time? I am happy
> to do whatever.
I'll copy/paste Mark's text, no need for v2. Thanks.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
will@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, trix@redhat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM IAS 15.x or newer
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:28:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTqFrf20z_RTB4sI@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231025183114.GA669177@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:31:14AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 07:01:53PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:21:28AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > A recent refactoring in the arm64 tree exposed an assembler bug in LLVM
> > > with regards to the generation of NOPs for arm64 big endian, resulting
> > > in near-immediate crashes on boot in QEMU.
> >
> > Could we please put a bit more detail into the commit message about what
> > exactly went wrong and how this was detected? I know that can be found
> > from the github links below, but having to go chase that is a bit of a
> > pain.
>
> Sure, sorry for leaving that out of the initial revision.
>
> > Would you be happy with the below? I've also added a Cc stable, since
> > this is a potential state corruption issue.
>
> That text looks much better to me, especially since it explains exactly
> what goes wrong here (which I was unsure of, this helps). Thanks a lot!
>
> Will / Catalin, would you like a v2 with that text or could it just be
> copied and pasted from Mark's mail during application time? I am happy
> to do whatever.
I'll copy/paste Mark's text, no need for v2. Thanks.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 17:21 [PATCH] arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM IAS 15.x or newer Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-25 17:21 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-25 18:01 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-25 18:01 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-25 18:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-25 18:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-26 15:28 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-10-26 15:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-26 15:31 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-26 15:31 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-26 15:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-26 15:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-26 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-26 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTqFrf20z_RTB4sI@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.