From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
sarah.walker@imgtec.com, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
faith@gfxstrand.net, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
donald.robson@imgtec.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 09/12] drm/gpuvm: reference count drm_gpuvm structures
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:14:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUTyGTxcH7WlHKsv@pollux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be93d9ef-3d3e-4262-a280-d2922b983ca1@amd.com>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 08:18:35AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 02.11.23 um 00:31 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
> > Implement reference counting for struct drm_gpuvm.
>
> From the design point of view what is that good for?
It was discussed in this thread [1].
Essentially, the idea is to make sure that vm_bo->vm is always valid without the
driver having the need to take extra care. It also ensures that GPUVM can't be
freed with mappings still held.
>
> Background is that the most common use case I see is that this object is
> embedded into something else and a reference count is then not really a good
> idea.
Do you have a specific use-case in mind where this would interfere?
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/6fa058a4-20d3-44b9-af58-755cfb375d75@redhat.com/
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 20 +++++++++---
> > include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > index 53e2c406fb04..6a88eafc5229 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > @@ -746,6 +746,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > gpuvm->rb.tree = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gpuvm->rb.list);
> > + kref_init(&gpuvm->kref);
> > +
> > gpuvm->name = name ? name : "unknown";
> > gpuvm->flags = flags;
> > gpuvm->ops = ops;
> > @@ -770,15 +772,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_init);
> > -/**
> > - * drm_gpuvm_destroy() - cleanup a &drm_gpuvm
> > - * @gpuvm: pointer to the &drm_gpuvm to clean up
> > - *
> > - * Note that it is a bug to call this function on a manager that still
> > - * holds GPU VA mappings.
> > - */
> > -void
> > -drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +static void
> > +drm_gpuvm_fini(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > {
> > gpuvm->name = NULL;
> > @@ -790,7 +785,33 @@ drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > drm_gem_object_put(gpuvm->r_obj);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_destroy);
> > +
> > +static void
> > +drm_gpuvm_free(struct kref *kref)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm = container_of(kref, struct drm_gpuvm, kref);
> > +
> > + if (drm_WARN_ON(gpuvm->drm, !gpuvm->ops->vm_free))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + drm_gpuvm_fini(gpuvm);
> > +
> > + gpuvm->ops->vm_free(gpuvm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_gpuvm_bo_put() - drop a struct drm_gpuvm reference
> > + * @gpuvm: the &drm_gpuvm to release the reference of
> > + *
> > + * This releases a reference to @gpuvm.
> > + */
> > +void
> > +drm_gpuvm_put(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + if (gpuvm)
> > + kref_put(&gpuvm->kref, drm_gpuvm_free);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_put);
> > static int
> > __drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
> > @@ -843,7 +864,7 @@ drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
> > if (unlikely(!drm_gpuvm_range_valid(gpuvm, addr, range)))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - return __drm_gpuva_insert(gpuvm, va);
> > + return __drm_gpuva_insert(drm_gpuvm_get(gpuvm), va);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuva_insert);
> > @@ -876,6 +897,7 @@ drm_gpuva_remove(struct drm_gpuva *va)
> > }
> > __drm_gpuva_remove(va);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(va->vm);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuva_remove);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > index 54be12c1272f..cb2f06565c46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > @@ -1780,6 +1780,18 @@ nouveau_uvmm_bo_unmap_all(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo)
> > }
> > }
> > +static void
> > +nouveau_uvmm_free(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm = uvmm_from_gpuvm(gpuvm);
> > +
> > + kfree(uvmm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct drm_gpuvm_ops gpuvm_ops = {
> > + .vm_free = nouveau_uvmm_free,
> > +};
> > +
> > int
> > nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > void *data,
> > @@ -1830,7 +1842,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > NOUVEAU_VA_SPACE_END,
> > init->kernel_managed_addr,
> > init->kernel_managed_size,
> > - NULL);
> > + &gpuvm_ops);
> > /* GPUVM takes care from here on. */
> > drm_gem_object_put(r_obj);
> > @@ -1849,8 +1861,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > return 0;
> > out_gpuvm_fini:
> > - drm_gpuvm_destroy(&uvmm->base);
> > - kfree(uvmm);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(&uvmm->base);
> > out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -1902,7 +1913,6 @@ nouveau_uvmm_fini(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm)
> > mutex_lock(&cli->mutex);
> > nouveau_vmm_fini(&uvmm->vmm);
> > - drm_gpuvm_destroy(&uvmm->base);
> > - kfree(uvmm);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(&uvmm->base);
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > index 0c2e24155a93..4e6e1fd3485a 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > @@ -247,6 +247,11 @@ struct drm_gpuvm {
> > struct list_head list;
> > } rb;
> > + /**
> > + * @kref: reference count of this object
> > + */
> > + struct kref kref;
> > +
> > /**
> > * @kernel_alloc_node:
> > *
> > @@ -273,7 +278,23 @@ void drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > u64 start_offset, u64 range,
> > u64 reserve_offset, u64 reserve_range,
> > const struct drm_gpuvm_ops *ops);
> > -void drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_gpuvm_get() - acquire a struct drm_gpuvm reference
> > + * @gpuvm: the &drm_gpuvm to acquire the reference of
> > + *
> > + * This function acquires an additional reference to @gpuvm. It is illegal to
> > + * call this without already holding a reference. No locks required.
> > + */
> > +static inline struct drm_gpuvm *
> > +drm_gpuvm_get(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + kref_get(&gpuvm->kref);
> > +
> > + return gpuvm;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void drm_gpuvm_put(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > bool drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range);
> > bool drm_gpuvm_interval_empty(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range);
> > @@ -673,6 +694,14 @@ static inline void drm_gpuva_init_from_op(struct drm_gpuva *va,
> > * operations to drivers.
> > */
> > struct drm_gpuvm_ops {
> > + /**
> > + * @vm_free: called when the last reference of a struct drm_gpuvm is
> > + * dropped
> > + *
> > + * This callback is mandatory.
> > + */
> > + void (*vm_free)(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > +
> > /**
> > * @op_alloc: called when the &drm_gpuvm allocates
> > * a struct drm_gpuva_op
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
sarah.walker@imgtec.com, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
faith@gfxstrand.net, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
donald.robson@imgtec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 09/12] drm/gpuvm: reference count drm_gpuvm structures
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:14:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUTyGTxcH7WlHKsv@pollux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be93d9ef-3d3e-4262-a280-d2922b983ca1@amd.com>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 08:18:35AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 02.11.23 um 00:31 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
> > Implement reference counting for struct drm_gpuvm.
>
> From the design point of view what is that good for?
It was discussed in this thread [1].
Essentially, the idea is to make sure that vm_bo->vm is always valid without the
driver having the need to take extra care. It also ensures that GPUVM can't be
freed with mappings still held.
>
> Background is that the most common use case I see is that this object is
> embedded into something else and a reference count is then not really a good
> idea.
Do you have a specific use-case in mind where this would interfere?
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/6fa058a4-20d3-44b9-af58-755cfb375d75@redhat.com/
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 20 +++++++++---
> > include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > index 53e2c406fb04..6a88eafc5229 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > @@ -746,6 +746,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > gpuvm->rb.tree = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gpuvm->rb.list);
> > + kref_init(&gpuvm->kref);
> > +
> > gpuvm->name = name ? name : "unknown";
> > gpuvm->flags = flags;
> > gpuvm->ops = ops;
> > @@ -770,15 +772,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_init);
> > -/**
> > - * drm_gpuvm_destroy() - cleanup a &drm_gpuvm
> > - * @gpuvm: pointer to the &drm_gpuvm to clean up
> > - *
> > - * Note that it is a bug to call this function on a manager that still
> > - * holds GPU VA mappings.
> > - */
> > -void
> > -drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +static void
> > +drm_gpuvm_fini(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > {
> > gpuvm->name = NULL;
> > @@ -790,7 +785,33 @@ drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > drm_gem_object_put(gpuvm->r_obj);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_destroy);
> > +
> > +static void
> > +drm_gpuvm_free(struct kref *kref)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm = container_of(kref, struct drm_gpuvm, kref);
> > +
> > + if (drm_WARN_ON(gpuvm->drm, !gpuvm->ops->vm_free))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + drm_gpuvm_fini(gpuvm);
> > +
> > + gpuvm->ops->vm_free(gpuvm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_gpuvm_bo_put() - drop a struct drm_gpuvm reference
> > + * @gpuvm: the &drm_gpuvm to release the reference of
> > + *
> > + * This releases a reference to @gpuvm.
> > + */
> > +void
> > +drm_gpuvm_put(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + if (gpuvm)
> > + kref_put(&gpuvm->kref, drm_gpuvm_free);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_put);
> > static int
> > __drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
> > @@ -843,7 +864,7 @@ drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
> > if (unlikely(!drm_gpuvm_range_valid(gpuvm, addr, range)))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - return __drm_gpuva_insert(gpuvm, va);
> > + return __drm_gpuva_insert(drm_gpuvm_get(gpuvm), va);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuva_insert);
> > @@ -876,6 +897,7 @@ drm_gpuva_remove(struct drm_gpuva *va)
> > }
> > __drm_gpuva_remove(va);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(va->vm);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuva_remove);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > index 54be12c1272f..cb2f06565c46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > @@ -1780,6 +1780,18 @@ nouveau_uvmm_bo_unmap_all(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo)
> > }
> > }
> > +static void
> > +nouveau_uvmm_free(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm = uvmm_from_gpuvm(gpuvm);
> > +
> > + kfree(uvmm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct drm_gpuvm_ops gpuvm_ops = {
> > + .vm_free = nouveau_uvmm_free,
> > +};
> > +
> > int
> > nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > void *data,
> > @@ -1830,7 +1842,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > NOUVEAU_VA_SPACE_END,
> > init->kernel_managed_addr,
> > init->kernel_managed_size,
> > - NULL);
> > + &gpuvm_ops);
> > /* GPUVM takes care from here on. */
> > drm_gem_object_put(r_obj);
> > @@ -1849,8 +1861,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > return 0;
> > out_gpuvm_fini:
> > - drm_gpuvm_destroy(&uvmm->base);
> > - kfree(uvmm);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(&uvmm->base);
> > out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -1902,7 +1913,6 @@ nouveau_uvmm_fini(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm)
> > mutex_lock(&cli->mutex);
> > nouveau_vmm_fini(&uvmm->vmm);
> > - drm_gpuvm_destroy(&uvmm->base);
> > - kfree(uvmm);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(&uvmm->base);
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > index 0c2e24155a93..4e6e1fd3485a 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > @@ -247,6 +247,11 @@ struct drm_gpuvm {
> > struct list_head list;
> > } rb;
> > + /**
> > + * @kref: reference count of this object
> > + */
> > + struct kref kref;
> > +
> > /**
> > * @kernel_alloc_node:
> > *
> > @@ -273,7 +278,23 @@ void drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > u64 start_offset, u64 range,
> > u64 reserve_offset, u64 reserve_range,
> > const struct drm_gpuvm_ops *ops);
> > -void drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_gpuvm_get() - acquire a struct drm_gpuvm reference
> > + * @gpuvm: the &drm_gpuvm to acquire the reference of
> > + *
> > + * This function acquires an additional reference to @gpuvm. It is illegal to
> > + * call this without already holding a reference. No locks required.
> > + */
> > +static inline struct drm_gpuvm *
> > +drm_gpuvm_get(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + kref_get(&gpuvm->kref);
> > +
> > + return gpuvm;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void drm_gpuvm_put(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > bool drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range);
> > bool drm_gpuvm_interval_empty(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range);
> > @@ -673,6 +694,14 @@ static inline void drm_gpuva_init_from_op(struct drm_gpuva *va,
> > * operations to drivers.
> > */
> > struct drm_gpuvm_ops {
> > + /**
> > + * @vm_free: called when the last reference of a struct drm_gpuvm is
> > + * dropped
> > + *
> > + * This callback is mandatory.
> > + */
> > + void (*vm_free)(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > +
> > /**
> > * @op_alloc: called when the &drm_gpuvm allocates
> > * a struct drm_gpuva_op
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, matthew.brost@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, sarah.walker@imgtec.com,
donald.robson@imgtec.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
faith@gfxstrand.net, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 09/12] drm/gpuvm: reference count drm_gpuvm structures
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:14:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUTyGTxcH7WlHKsv@pollux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be93d9ef-3d3e-4262-a280-d2922b983ca1@amd.com>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 08:18:35AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 02.11.23 um 00:31 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
> > Implement reference counting for struct drm_gpuvm.
>
> From the design point of view what is that good for?
It was discussed in this thread [1].
Essentially, the idea is to make sure that vm_bo->vm is always valid without the
driver having the need to take extra care. It also ensures that GPUVM can't be
freed with mappings still held.
>
> Background is that the most common use case I see is that this object is
> embedded into something else and a reference count is then not really a good
> idea.
Do you have a specific use-case in mind where this would interfere?
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/6fa058a4-20d3-44b9-af58-755cfb375d75@redhat.com/
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 20 +++++++++---
> > include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > index 53e2c406fb04..6a88eafc5229 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> > @@ -746,6 +746,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > gpuvm->rb.tree = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gpuvm->rb.list);
> > + kref_init(&gpuvm->kref);
> > +
> > gpuvm->name = name ? name : "unknown";
> > gpuvm->flags = flags;
> > gpuvm->ops = ops;
> > @@ -770,15 +772,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_init);
> > -/**
> > - * drm_gpuvm_destroy() - cleanup a &drm_gpuvm
> > - * @gpuvm: pointer to the &drm_gpuvm to clean up
> > - *
> > - * Note that it is a bug to call this function on a manager that still
> > - * holds GPU VA mappings.
> > - */
> > -void
> > -drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +static void
> > +drm_gpuvm_fini(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > {
> > gpuvm->name = NULL;
> > @@ -790,7 +785,33 @@ drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > drm_gem_object_put(gpuvm->r_obj);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_destroy);
> > +
> > +static void
> > +drm_gpuvm_free(struct kref *kref)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm = container_of(kref, struct drm_gpuvm, kref);
> > +
> > + if (drm_WARN_ON(gpuvm->drm, !gpuvm->ops->vm_free))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + drm_gpuvm_fini(gpuvm);
> > +
> > + gpuvm->ops->vm_free(gpuvm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_gpuvm_bo_put() - drop a struct drm_gpuvm reference
> > + * @gpuvm: the &drm_gpuvm to release the reference of
> > + *
> > + * This releases a reference to @gpuvm.
> > + */
> > +void
> > +drm_gpuvm_put(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + if (gpuvm)
> > + kref_put(&gpuvm->kref, drm_gpuvm_free);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_put);
> > static int
> > __drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
> > @@ -843,7 +864,7 @@ drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
> > if (unlikely(!drm_gpuvm_range_valid(gpuvm, addr, range)))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - return __drm_gpuva_insert(gpuvm, va);
> > + return __drm_gpuva_insert(drm_gpuvm_get(gpuvm), va);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuva_insert);
> > @@ -876,6 +897,7 @@ drm_gpuva_remove(struct drm_gpuva *va)
> > }
> > __drm_gpuva_remove(va);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(va->vm);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuva_remove);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > index 54be12c1272f..cb2f06565c46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > @@ -1780,6 +1780,18 @@ nouveau_uvmm_bo_unmap_all(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo)
> > }
> > }
> > +static void
> > +nouveau_uvmm_free(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm = uvmm_from_gpuvm(gpuvm);
> > +
> > + kfree(uvmm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct drm_gpuvm_ops gpuvm_ops = {
> > + .vm_free = nouveau_uvmm_free,
> > +};
> > +
> > int
> > nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > void *data,
> > @@ -1830,7 +1842,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > NOUVEAU_VA_SPACE_END,
> > init->kernel_managed_addr,
> > init->kernel_managed_size,
> > - NULL);
> > + &gpuvm_ops);
> > /* GPUVM takes care from here on. */
> > drm_gem_object_put(r_obj);
> > @@ -1849,8 +1861,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > return 0;
> > out_gpuvm_fini:
> > - drm_gpuvm_destroy(&uvmm->base);
> > - kfree(uvmm);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(&uvmm->base);
> > out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -1902,7 +1913,6 @@ nouveau_uvmm_fini(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm)
> > mutex_lock(&cli->mutex);
> > nouveau_vmm_fini(&uvmm->vmm);
> > - drm_gpuvm_destroy(&uvmm->base);
> > - kfree(uvmm);
> > + drm_gpuvm_put(&uvmm->base);
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > index 0c2e24155a93..4e6e1fd3485a 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
> > @@ -247,6 +247,11 @@ struct drm_gpuvm {
> > struct list_head list;
> > } rb;
> > + /**
> > + * @kref: reference count of this object
> > + */
> > + struct kref kref;
> > +
> > /**
> > * @kernel_alloc_node:
> > *
> > @@ -273,7 +278,23 @@ void drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
> > u64 start_offset, u64 range,
> > u64 reserve_offset, u64 reserve_range,
> > const struct drm_gpuvm_ops *ops);
> > -void drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_gpuvm_get() - acquire a struct drm_gpuvm reference
> > + * @gpuvm: the &drm_gpuvm to acquire the reference of
> > + *
> > + * This function acquires an additional reference to @gpuvm. It is illegal to
> > + * call this without already holding a reference. No locks required.
> > + */
> > +static inline struct drm_gpuvm *
> > +drm_gpuvm_get(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> > +{
> > + kref_get(&gpuvm->kref);
> > +
> > + return gpuvm;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void drm_gpuvm_put(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > bool drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range);
> > bool drm_gpuvm_interval_empty(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range);
> > @@ -673,6 +694,14 @@ static inline void drm_gpuva_init_from_op(struct drm_gpuva *va,
> > * operations to drivers.
> > */
> > struct drm_gpuvm_ops {
> > + /**
> > + * @vm_free: called when the last reference of a struct drm_gpuvm is
> > + * dropped
> > + *
> > + * This callback is mandatory.
> > + */
> > + void (*vm_free)(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm);
> > +
> > /**
> > * @op_alloc: called when the &drm_gpuvm allocates
> > * a struct drm_gpuva_op
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-03 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 141+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-01 23:30 [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 00/12] [RFC] DRM GPUVM features Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 01/12] drm/gpuvm: convert WARN() to drm_WARN() variants Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 02/12] drm/gpuvm: don't always WARN in drm_gpuvm_check_overflow() Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 13:19 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:19 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:19 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-01 23:30 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 03/12] drm/gpuvm: export drm_gpuvm_range_valid() Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 13:20 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:20 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:20 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-01 23:30 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 04/12] drm/nouveau: make use of drm_gpuvm_range_valid() Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 4:46 ` [Nouveau] " Dave Airlie
2023-11-02 4:46 ` Dave Airlie
2023-11-02 4:46 ` Dave Airlie
2023-11-01 23:30 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 05/12] drm/gpuvm: add common dma-resv per struct drm_gpuvm Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 06/12] drm/nouveau: make use of the GPUVM's shared dma-resv Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 07/12] drm/gpuvm: add drm_gpuvm_flags to drm_gpuvm Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 08/12] drm/nouveau: separately allocate struct nouveau_uvmm Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 4:44 ` [Nouveau] " Dave Airlie
2023-11-02 4:44 ` Dave Airlie
2023-11-02 4:44 ` Dave Airlie
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 09/12] drm/gpuvm: reference count drm_gpuvm structures Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 10:46 ` [Nouveau] " kernel test robot
2023-11-02 10:46 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-02 10:46 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-02 13:21 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:21 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:21 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 17:09 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 17:09 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 17:09 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 17:32 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 17:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 17:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 18:04 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 18:04 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 18:04 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-03 7:18 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-03 7:18 ` Christian König
2023-11-03 7:18 ` Christian König
2023-11-03 13:14 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2023-11-03 13:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-03 13:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-03 14:04 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-03 14:04 ` Christian König
2023-11-03 15:34 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-03 15:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-03 15:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 9:14 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-06 9:14 ` Christian König
2023-11-06 9:14 ` Christian König
2023-11-06 12:16 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 12:16 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 12:16 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 13:05 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-06 13:05 ` Christian König
2023-11-06 14:11 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 14:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 14:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 15:10 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-06 15:10 ` Christian König
2023-11-06 16:42 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 16:42 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-06 16:42 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-09 15:50 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-09 15:50 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-09 15:50 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-09 16:03 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-09 16:03 ` Christian König
2023-11-09 16:03 ` Christian König
2023-11-09 18:34 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-09 18:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-09 18:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 8:50 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-10 8:50 ` Christian König
2023-11-10 8:50 ` Christian König
2023-11-10 9:39 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-10 9:39 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-10 9:39 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-10 10:42 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-10 10:42 ` Christian König
2023-11-10 10:42 ` Christian König
2023-11-10 10:52 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-10 10:52 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-10 10:52 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-10 16:49 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:43 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:57 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-10 16:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-13 7:22 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2023-11-13 7:22 ` Christian König
2023-11-13 7:22 ` Christian König
2023-11-13 12:57 ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-13 12:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-13 12:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 10/12] drm/gpuvm: add an abstraction for a VM / BO combination Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 13:25 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:25 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:25 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 17:16 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 17:16 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 17:16 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 11/12] drm/gpuvm: track/lock/validate external/evicted objects Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v8 12/12] drm/nouveau: use GPUVM common infrastructure Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-01 23:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-02 4:47 ` [Nouveau] " Dave Airlie
2023-11-02 4:47 ` Dave Airlie
2023-11-02 4:47 ` Dave Airlie
2023-11-02 13:18 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:18 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-02 13:18 ` Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUTyGTxcH7WlHKsv@pollux \
--to=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=donald.robson@imgtec.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith@gfxstrand.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sarah.walker@imgtec.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.