All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a type for the STE
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:06:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVONEV2wtAMQp3-Q@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1-v2-de8b10590bf5+400-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:53:08PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a STE wrap it in a
> "struct arm_smmu_ste" with an array of the correct size. This makes it
> much clearer which functions will comprise the "STE API".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 54 ++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  7 ++-
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 7445454c2af244..519749d15fbda0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
> -				      __le64 *dst)
> +				      struct arm_smmu_ste *dst)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * This is hideously complicated, but we only really care about
> @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  	 * 2. Write everything apart from dword 0, sync, write dword 0, sync
>  	 * 3. Update Config, sync
>  	 */
> -	u64 val = le64_to_cpu(dst[0]);
> +	u64 val = le64_to_cpu(dst->data[0]);
>  	bool ste_live = false;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = NULL;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = NULL;
> @@ -1325,10 +1325,10 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		else
>  			val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_BYPASS);
>  
> -		dst[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> -		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG,
> +		dst->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> +		dst->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG,
>  						STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> -		dst[2] = 0; /* Nuke the VMID */
> +		dst->data[2] = 0; /* Nuke the VMID */
>  		/*
>  		 * The SMMU can perform negative caching, so we must sync
>  		 * the STE regardless of whether the old value was live.
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  			STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 : STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1;
>  
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
> -		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		dst->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  
>  		if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
>  		    !master->stall_enabled)
> -			dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
> +			dst->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
>  
>  		val |= (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> @@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  
>  	if (s2_cfg) {
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
> -		dst[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		dst->data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
>  #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> @@ -1371,18 +1371,18 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  			 STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW | STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
>  			 STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
>  
> -		dst[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> +		dst->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
>  
>  		val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (master->ats_enabled)
> -		dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> +		dst->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
>  						 STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS));
>  
>  	arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(smmu, sid);
>  	/* See comment in arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc() */
> -	WRITE_ONCE(dst[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
> +	WRITE_ONCE(dst->data[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
>  	arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(smmu, sid);
>  
>  	/* It's likely that we'll want to use the new STE soon */
> @@ -1390,7 +1390,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &prefetch_cmd);
>  }
>  
> -static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent, bool force)
> +static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(struct arm_smmu_ste *strtab,
> +				      unsigned int nent, bool force)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	u64 val = STRTAB_STE_0_V;
> @@ -1401,11 +1402,11 @@ static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent, bool fo
>  		val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_BYPASS);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nent; ++i) {
> -		strtab[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> -		strtab[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG,
> -						   STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> -		strtab[2] = 0;
> -		strtab += STRTAB_STE_DWORDS;
> +		strtab->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> +		strtab->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(
> +			STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG, STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> +		strtab->data[2] = 0;
> +		strtab++;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -2209,26 +2210,22 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> +static struct arm_smmu_ste *
> +arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  {
> -	__le64 *step;
>  	struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
>  
>  	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> -		struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *l1_desc;
>  		int idx;
>  
>  		/* Two-level walk */
>  		idx = (sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT) * STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> -		l1_desc = &cfg->l1_desc[idx];
> -		idx = (sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)) * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS;
> -		step = &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
> +		return &cfg->l1_desc[idx].l2ptr[sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)];
>  	} else {
>  		/* Simple linear lookup */
> -		step = &cfg->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
> +		return (struct arm_smmu_ste *)&cfg
> +			       ->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
>  	}
> -
> -	return step;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> @@ -2238,7 +2235,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; ++i) {
>  		u32 sid = master->streams[i].id;
> -		__le64 *step = arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(smmu, sid);
> +		struct arm_smmu_ste *step =
> +			arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(smmu, sid);
>  
>  		/* Bridged PCI devices may end up with duplicated IDs */
>  		for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
> @@ -3769,7 +3767,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	iort_get_rmr_sids(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(e, &rmr_list, list) {
> -		__le64 *step;
> +		struct arm_smmu_ste *step;
>  		struct iommu_iort_rmr_data *rmr;
>  		int ret, i;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 961205ba86d25d..03f9e526cbd92f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -206,6 +206,11 @@
>  #define STRTAB_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 6)
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_DWORDS		8
> +
> +struct arm_smmu_ste {
> +	__le64 data[STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
> +};
> +
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_V			(1UL << 0)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_CFG		GENMASK_ULL(3, 1)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_ABORT		0
> @@ -571,7 +576,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_priq {
>  struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc {
>  	u8				span;
>  
> -	__le64				*l2ptr;
> +	struct arm_smmu_ste		*l2ptr;
>  	dma_addr_t			l2ptr_dma;
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a type for the STE
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:06:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVONEV2wtAMQp3-Q@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1-v2-de8b10590bf5+400-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:53:08PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a STE wrap it in a
> "struct arm_smmu_ste" with an array of the correct size. This makes it
> much clearer which functions will comprise the "STE API".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 54 ++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  7 ++-
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 7445454c2af244..519749d15fbda0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
> -				      __le64 *dst)
> +				      struct arm_smmu_ste *dst)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * This is hideously complicated, but we only really care about
> @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  	 * 2. Write everything apart from dword 0, sync, write dword 0, sync
>  	 * 3. Update Config, sync
>  	 */
> -	u64 val = le64_to_cpu(dst[0]);
> +	u64 val = le64_to_cpu(dst->data[0]);
>  	bool ste_live = false;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = NULL;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = NULL;
> @@ -1325,10 +1325,10 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		else
>  			val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_BYPASS);
>  
> -		dst[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> -		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG,
> +		dst->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> +		dst->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG,
>  						STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> -		dst[2] = 0; /* Nuke the VMID */
> +		dst->data[2] = 0; /* Nuke the VMID */
>  		/*
>  		 * The SMMU can perform negative caching, so we must sync
>  		 * the STE regardless of whether the old value was live.
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  			STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 : STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1;
>  
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
> -		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		dst->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  
>  		if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
>  		    !master->stall_enabled)
> -			dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
> +			dst->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
>  
>  		val |= (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> @@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  
>  	if (s2_cfg) {
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
> -		dst[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		dst->data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
>  #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> @@ -1371,18 +1371,18 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  			 STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW | STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
>  			 STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
>  
> -		dst[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> +		dst->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
>  
>  		val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (master->ats_enabled)
> -		dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> +		dst->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
>  						 STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS));
>  
>  	arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(smmu, sid);
>  	/* See comment in arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc() */
> -	WRITE_ONCE(dst[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
> +	WRITE_ONCE(dst->data[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
>  	arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(smmu, sid);
>  
>  	/* It's likely that we'll want to use the new STE soon */
> @@ -1390,7 +1390,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &prefetch_cmd);
>  }
>  
> -static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent, bool force)
> +static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(struct arm_smmu_ste *strtab,
> +				      unsigned int nent, bool force)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	u64 val = STRTAB_STE_0_V;
> @@ -1401,11 +1402,11 @@ static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent, bool fo
>  		val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_BYPASS);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nent; ++i) {
> -		strtab[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> -		strtab[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG,
> -						   STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> -		strtab[2] = 0;
> -		strtab += STRTAB_STE_DWORDS;
> +		strtab->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> +		strtab->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(
> +			STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG, STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> +		strtab->data[2] = 0;
> +		strtab++;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -2209,26 +2210,22 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> +static struct arm_smmu_ste *
> +arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  {
> -	__le64 *step;
>  	struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
>  
>  	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> -		struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *l1_desc;
>  		int idx;
>  
>  		/* Two-level walk */
>  		idx = (sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT) * STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> -		l1_desc = &cfg->l1_desc[idx];
> -		idx = (sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)) * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS;
> -		step = &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
> +		return &cfg->l1_desc[idx].l2ptr[sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)];
>  	} else {
>  		/* Simple linear lookup */
> -		step = &cfg->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
> +		return (struct arm_smmu_ste *)&cfg
> +			       ->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
>  	}
> -
> -	return step;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> @@ -2238,7 +2235,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; ++i) {
>  		u32 sid = master->streams[i].id;
> -		__le64 *step = arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(smmu, sid);
> +		struct arm_smmu_ste *step =
> +			arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(smmu, sid);
>  
>  		/* Bridged PCI devices may end up with duplicated IDs */
>  		for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
> @@ -3769,7 +3767,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	iort_get_rmr_sids(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(e, &rmr_list, list) {
> -		__le64 *step;
> +		struct arm_smmu_ste *step;
>  		struct iommu_iort_rmr_data *rmr;
>  		int ret, i;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 961205ba86d25d..03f9e526cbd92f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -206,6 +206,11 @@
>  #define STRTAB_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 6)
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_DWORDS		8
> +
> +struct arm_smmu_ste {
> +	__le64 data[STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
> +};
> +
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_V			(1UL << 0)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_CFG		GENMASK_ULL(3, 1)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_ABORT		0
> @@ -571,7 +576,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_priq {
>  struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc {
>  	u8				span;
>  
> -	__le64				*l2ptr;
> +	struct arm_smmu_ste		*l2ptr;
>  	dma_addr_t			l2ptr_dma;
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-14 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 158+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-13 17:53 [PATCH v2 00/19] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a type for the STE Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-14 15:06   ` Moritz Fischer [this message]
2023-11-14 15:06     ` Moritz Fischer
2023-11-15 11:52     ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 11:52       ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 13:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 13:35         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27 16:03   ` Eric Auger
2023-11-27 16:03     ` Eric Auger
2023-11-27 17:42     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27 17:42       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27 17:51       ` Eric Auger
2023-11-27 17:51         ` Eric Auger
2023-11-27 18:21         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27 18:21           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  0:44   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  0:44     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Master cannot be NULL in arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-14 15:17   ` Moritz Fischer
2023-11-14 15:17     ` Moritz Fischer
2023-11-15 11:55     ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 11:55       ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-27 15:41   ` Eric Auger
2023-11-27 15:41     ` Eric Auger
2023-12-05  0:45   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  0:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-14 15:18   ` Moritz Fischer
2023-11-14 15:18     ` Moritz Fischer
2023-11-27 16:35   ` Eric Auger
2023-11-27 16:35     ` Eric Auger
2023-12-05  0:46   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  0:46     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  1:38   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  1:38     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate the STE generation for abort/bypass Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 12:17   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 12:17     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  1:43   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  1:43     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 13:57   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 13:57     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  1:45   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  1:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-14 15:24   ` Moritz Fischer
2023-11-14 15:24     ` Moritz Fischer
2023-11-15 14:01   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 14:01     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  1:55   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  1:55     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05 14:35     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 14:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole STE in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 14:04   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 14:04     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  1:58   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  1:58     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hold arm_smmu_asid_lock during all of attach_dev Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 14:12   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 14:12     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  2:16   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  2:16     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 14:16   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 14:16     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  2:13   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  2:13     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not change the STE twice during arm_smmu_attach_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 15:15   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 15:15     ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-16 16:28     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-16 16:28       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  2:46   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  2:46     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put writing the context descriptor in the right order Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 15:32   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 15:32     ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-16 16:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-16 16:46       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-17  4:14       ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-17  4:14         ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  3:38   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  3:38     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass smmu_domain to arm_enable/disable_ats() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  3:56   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  3:56     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove arm_smmu_master->domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27 17:14   ` Eric Auger
2023-11-27 17:14     ` Eric Auger
2023-11-30 12:03     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-30 12:03       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 13:25       ` Eric Auger
2023-12-05 13:25         ` Eric Auger
2023-12-05  4:47   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  4:47     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 15:50   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 15:50     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  4:28   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  4:28     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05 14:37     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 14:37       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 17:25       ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05 17:25         ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05 17:42         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 17:42           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 18:21           ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05 18:21             ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05 19:03             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 19:03               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static BLOCKED domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 15:57   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 15:57     ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-16 15:44     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-16 15:44       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  4:05   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  4:05     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the identity/blocked domain during release Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  4:07   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  4:07     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass arm_smmu_domain and arm_smmu_device to finalize Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-15 16:02   ` Michael Shavit
2023-11-15 16:02     ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-05  4:42   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  4:42     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 17:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  4:40   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  4:40     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-11-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/19] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/3) Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-11-27 16:10   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-11-27 17:48   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27 17:48     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05  3:54 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-12-05  3:54   ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVONEV2wtAMQp3-Q@archbook \
    --to=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.