All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	matthew.auld@intel.com, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Marcin Wojtas <mwojtas@chromium.org>,
	Drew Davenport <ddavenport@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:13:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231105172718.18673-1-pazz@chromium.org>

On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 05:27:03PM +0000, Paz Zcharya wrote:
> Fix the value of variable `phys_base` to be the relative offset in
> stolen memory, and not the absolute offset of the GSM.

to me it looks like the other way around. phys_base is the physical
base address for the frame_buffer. Setting it to zero doesn't seem
to make that relative. And also doesn't look right.

> 
> Currently, the value of `phys_base` is set to "Surface Base Address,"
> which in the case of Meter Lake is 0xfc00_0000.

I don't believe this is a fixed value. IIRC this comes from the register
set by video bios, where the idea is to reuse the fb that was used so
far.

With this in mind I don't understand how that could overflow. Maybe
the size of the stolen is not right? maybe the size? maybe different
memory region?

> This causes the
> function `i915_gem_object_create_region_at` to fail in line 128, when
> it attempts to verify that the range does not overflow:
> 
> if (range_overflows(offset, size, resource_size(&mem->region)))
>       return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
> where:
>   offset = 0xfc000000
>   size = 0x8ca000
>   mem->region.end + 1 = 0x4400000
>   mem->region.start = 0x800000
>   resource_size(&mem->region) = 0x3c00000
> 
> call stack:
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> Looking at the flow coming next, we see that `phys_base` is only used
> once, in function `_i915_gem_object_stolen_init`, in the context of
> the offset *in* the stolen memory. Combining that with an
> examinination of the history of the file seems to indicate the
> current value set is invalid.
> 
> call stack (functions using `phys_base`)
>   _i915_gem_object_stolen_init
>   __i915_gem_object_create_region
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> [drm:_i915_gem_object_stolen_init] creating preallocated stolen
> object: stolen_offset=0x0000000000000000, size=0x00000000008ca000
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> index a55c09cbd0e4..e696cb13756a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  			"Using phys_base=%pa, based on initial plane programming\n",
>  			&phys_base);
>  	} else {
> -		phys_base = base;
> +		phys_base = 0;
>  		mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	matthew.auld@intel.com, Marcin Wojtas <mwojtas@chromium.org>,
	Drew Davenport <ddavenport@chromium.org>,
	Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:13:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231105172718.18673-1-pazz@chromium.org>

On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 05:27:03PM +0000, Paz Zcharya wrote:
> Fix the value of variable `phys_base` to be the relative offset in
> stolen memory, and not the absolute offset of the GSM.

to me it looks like the other way around. phys_base is the physical
base address for the frame_buffer. Setting it to zero doesn't seem
to make that relative. And also doesn't look right.

> 
> Currently, the value of `phys_base` is set to "Surface Base Address,"
> which in the case of Meter Lake is 0xfc00_0000.

I don't believe this is a fixed value. IIRC this comes from the register
set by video bios, where the idea is to reuse the fb that was used so
far.

With this in mind I don't understand how that could overflow. Maybe
the size of the stolen is not right? maybe the size? maybe different
memory region?

> This causes the
> function `i915_gem_object_create_region_at` to fail in line 128, when
> it attempts to verify that the range does not overflow:
> 
> if (range_overflows(offset, size, resource_size(&mem->region)))
>       return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
> where:
>   offset = 0xfc000000
>   size = 0x8ca000
>   mem->region.end + 1 = 0x4400000
>   mem->region.start = 0x800000
>   resource_size(&mem->region) = 0x3c00000
> 
> call stack:
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> Looking at the flow coming next, we see that `phys_base` is only used
> once, in function `_i915_gem_object_stolen_init`, in the context of
> the offset *in* the stolen memory. Combining that with an
> examinination of the history of the file seems to indicate the
> current value set is invalid.
> 
> call stack (functions using `phys_base`)
>   _i915_gem_object_stolen_init
>   __i915_gem_object_create_region
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> [drm:_i915_gem_object_stolen_init] creating preallocated stolen
> object: stolen_offset=0x0000000000000000, size=0x00000000008ca000
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> index a55c09cbd0e4..e696cb13756a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  			"Using phys_base=%pa, based on initial plane programming\n",
>  			&phys_base);
>  	} else {
> -		phys_base = base;
> +		phys_base = 0;
>  		mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Cc: <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	"Marcin Wojtas" <mwojtas@chromium.org>,
	Drew Davenport <ddavenport@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:13:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231105172718.18673-1-pazz@chromium.org>

On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 05:27:03PM +0000, Paz Zcharya wrote:
> Fix the value of variable `phys_base` to be the relative offset in
> stolen memory, and not the absolute offset of the GSM.

to me it looks like the other way around. phys_base is the physical
base address for the frame_buffer. Setting it to zero doesn't seem
to make that relative. And also doesn't look right.

> 
> Currently, the value of `phys_base` is set to "Surface Base Address,"
> which in the case of Meter Lake is 0xfc00_0000.

I don't believe this is a fixed value. IIRC this comes from the register
set by video bios, where the idea is to reuse the fb that was used so
far.

With this in mind I don't understand how that could overflow. Maybe
the size of the stolen is not right? maybe the size? maybe different
memory region?

> This causes the
> function `i915_gem_object_create_region_at` to fail in line 128, when
> it attempts to verify that the range does not overflow:
> 
> if (range_overflows(offset, size, resource_size(&mem->region)))
>       return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
> where:
>   offset = 0xfc000000
>   size = 0x8ca000
>   mem->region.end + 1 = 0x4400000
>   mem->region.start = 0x800000
>   resource_size(&mem->region) = 0x3c00000
> 
> call stack:
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> Looking at the flow coming next, we see that `phys_base` is only used
> once, in function `_i915_gem_object_stolen_init`, in the context of
> the offset *in* the stolen memory. Combining that with an
> examinination of the history of the file seems to indicate the
> current value set is invalid.
> 
> call stack (functions using `phys_base`)
>   _i915_gem_object_stolen_init
>   __i915_gem_object_create_region
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> [drm:_i915_gem_object_stolen_init] creating preallocated stolen
> object: stolen_offset=0x0000000000000000, size=0x00000000008ca000
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> index a55c09cbd0e4..e696cb13756a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  			"Using phys_base=%pa, based on initial plane programming\n",
>  			&phys_base);
>  	} else {
> -		phys_base = base;
> +		phys_base = 0;
>  		mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-15  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-05 17:27 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute Paz Zcharya
2023-11-05 17:27 ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-05 17:27 ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-05 18:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-11-15  3:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-11-15  3:13   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-15  3:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-17 23:01   ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-17 23:01     ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-17 23:01     ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-21 12:06     ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-21 12:06       ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-22 13:26       ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-22 13:26         ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28  1:20         ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28  1:20           ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28  1:20           ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28  3:47         ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28  3:47           ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28  3:47           ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28 11:12           ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28 11:12             ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28 11:12             ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28 11:19             ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28 11:19               ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28 11:19               ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-30 16:24             ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-30 16:24               ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-30 16:24               ` Paz Zcharya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ddavenport@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=pazz@chromium.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=subratabanik@google.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.