From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 1/8] drm/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:57:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVaCQlfHCfblg8ux@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231116144316.7-2-francois.dugast@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 02:43:09PM +0000, Francois Dugast wrote:
> From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>
> The bind api is extensible but for a single bind op, there
> is not a mechanism to extend. Add extensions field to
> struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index d66e8dc72e96..eb53c7a367a1 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -613,6 +613,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
> };
>
> struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
> + /** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> + __u64 extensions;
> +
> /**
> * @obj: GEM object to operate on, MBZ for MAP_USERPTR, MBZ for UNMAP
> */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 14:43 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 0/8] uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 1/8] drm/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 2/8] drm/xe/uapi: Separate bo_create placement from flags Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 3/8] drm/xe: Make DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 4/8] drm/xe/uapi: Reject bo creation of unaligned size Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 5/8] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (memory regions) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:39 ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 6/8] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (gt) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:40 ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 20:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-16 21:28 ` Matt Roper
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 7/8] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (engines) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:42 ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 8/8] drm/xe/uapi: Add Tile ID information to the GT info query Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:44 ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 20:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-16 20:54 ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-17 4:06 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/uapi: Fix various struct padding for 64b alignment Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-17 14:25 ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-17 20:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-17 20:57 ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-17 16:24 ` [Intel-xe] " Matt Roper
2023-11-16 14:46 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Patchwork
2023-11-17 23:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/xe/uapi: Fix various struct padding for 64b alignment Patchwork
2023-11-18 3:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Patchwork
2023-11-18 3:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2023-11-18 3:15 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-11-18 3:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-11-18 3:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-18 3:24 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2023-11-18 3:59 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-20 12:44 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZVaCQlfHCfblg8ux@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.