From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ignat@cloudflare.com,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
eric_devolder@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:10:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZW00/Cfk47Cc3kGo@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
eric_devolder@yahoo.com, ignat@cloudflare.com,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Bcc: bhe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <bbd1bbfb-c482-433d-bce9-2b591b8e855e@infradead.org>
On 12/01/23 at 11:53am, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 11/30/23 18:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20231130:
> >
>
> on riscv 32-bit or 64-bit, with
> # CONFIG_MMU is not set
Thanks for providing the kernel config to ease reproduction. In the config,
there are:
CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
......
# CONFIG_MMU is not set
After investigation, I found this happened after Ignat's patch:
commit 1c7a3fa49ef7 ("kexec: drop dependency on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC from CRASH_DUMP")
Copy above commit change here for reference, and also risc-v's
ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC depends on MMU:
--------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
index fc38f1ae3a30..946dffa048b7 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ config KEXEC_JUMP
config CRASH_DUMP
bool "kernel crash dumps"
depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
- depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC
select CRASH_CORE
select KEXEC_CORE
help
arch/riscv/Kconfig
---------------------
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC
def_bool MMU
Before Ignat's patch, once CONFIG_MMU is unset, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP,
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, CONFIG_CRASH_CORE are all unset automatically. The
crash_core codes are not compiled. That's why no compiling error is
seen.
After Ignat's patch applied, we can enable CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP,
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, CONFIG_CRASH_CORE independently. However, there are
several macro definitions, such as VA_BITS, VMEMMAP_START, VMEMMAP_END,
MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END are only available when CONFIG_MMU=y.
I made two patches to decouple the kexec/crash code with CONFIG_MMU. Not
sure if risc-v wants that.
Or we can simply add dependency on MMU for ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP.
Then when CONFIG_MMU=n, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP, CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE,
CONFIG_CRASH_CORE will be unset too. Please help check which one need be
taken.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 24c1799e2ec4..03d290da7262 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
def_bool y
+ depends on MMU=y
config ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION
def_bool CRASH_CORE
>
> In file included from ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:3:
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c: In function 'arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo':
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:8:27: error: 'VA_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 8 | VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> | ^~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/crash_core.h:78:64: note: in definition of macro 'VMCOREINFO_NUMBER'
> 78 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(%s)=%ld\n", #name, (long)name)
> | ^~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:8:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 8 | VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> | ^~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/crash_core.h:78:64: note: in definition of macro 'VMCOREINFO_NUMBER'
> 78 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(%s)=%ld\n", #name, (long)name)
> | ^~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:12:58: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
> 12 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_START)=0x%lx\n", VMALLOC_START);
> | ~~^
> | |
> | long unsigned int
> | %x
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:14:64: error: 'VMEMMAP_START' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 14 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_START)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_START);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:15:62: error: 'VMEMMAP_END' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MEMREMAP_ENC'?
> 15 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_END)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_END);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | MEMREMAP_ENC
>
> 64-bit only:
>
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:17:64: error: 'MODULES_VADDR' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 17 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_VADDR)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_VADDR);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:18:62: error: 'MODULES_END' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 18 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_END)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_END);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
>
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ignat@cloudflare.com,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
eric_devolder@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:10:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZW00/Cfk47Cc3kGo@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
eric_devolder@yahoo.com, ignat@cloudflare.com,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Bcc: bhe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <bbd1bbfb-c482-433d-bce9-2b591b8e855e@infradead.org>
On 12/01/23 at 11:53am, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 11/30/23 18:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20231130:
> >
>
> on riscv 32-bit or 64-bit, with
> # CONFIG_MMU is not set
Thanks for providing the kernel config to ease reproduction. In the config,
there are:
CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
......
# CONFIG_MMU is not set
After investigation, I found this happened after Ignat's patch:
commit 1c7a3fa49ef7 ("kexec: drop dependency on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC from CRASH_DUMP")
Copy above commit change here for reference, and also risc-v's
ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC depends on MMU:
--------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
index fc38f1ae3a30..946dffa048b7 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ config KEXEC_JUMP
config CRASH_DUMP
bool "kernel crash dumps"
depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
- depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC
select CRASH_CORE
select KEXEC_CORE
help
arch/riscv/Kconfig
---------------------
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC
def_bool MMU
Before Ignat's patch, once CONFIG_MMU is unset, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP,
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, CONFIG_CRASH_CORE are all unset automatically. The
crash_core codes are not compiled. That's why no compiling error is
seen.
After Ignat's patch applied, we can enable CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP,
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, CONFIG_CRASH_CORE independently. However, there are
several macro definitions, such as VA_BITS, VMEMMAP_START, VMEMMAP_END,
MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END are only available when CONFIG_MMU=y.
I made two patches to decouple the kexec/crash code with CONFIG_MMU. Not
sure if risc-v wants that.
Or we can simply add dependency on MMU for ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP.
Then when CONFIG_MMU=n, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP, CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE,
CONFIG_CRASH_CORE will be unset too. Please help check which one need be
taken.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 24c1799e2ec4..03d290da7262 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
def_bool y
+ depends on MMU=y
config ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION
def_bool CRASH_CORE
>
> In file included from ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:3:
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c: In function 'arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo':
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:8:27: error: 'VA_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 8 | VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> | ^~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/crash_core.h:78:64: note: in definition of macro 'VMCOREINFO_NUMBER'
> 78 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(%s)=%ld\n", #name, (long)name)
> | ^~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:8:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 8 | VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> | ^~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/crash_core.h:78:64: note: in definition of macro 'VMCOREINFO_NUMBER'
> 78 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(%s)=%ld\n", #name, (long)name)
> | ^~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:12:58: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
> 12 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_START)=0x%lx\n", VMALLOC_START);
> | ~~^
> | |
> | long unsigned int
> | %x
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:14:64: error: 'VMEMMAP_START' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 14 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_START)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_START);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:15:62: error: 'VMEMMAP_END' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MEMREMAP_ENC'?
> 15 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_END)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_END);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | MEMREMAP_ENC
>
> 64-bit only:
>
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:17:64: error: 'MODULES_VADDR' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 17 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_VADDR)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_VADDR);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:18:62: error: 'MODULES_END' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 18 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_END)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_END);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ignat@cloudflare.com,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
eric_devolder@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:10:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZW00/Cfk47Cc3kGo@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
eric_devolder@yahoo.com, ignat@cloudflare.com,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Bcc: bhe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <bbd1bbfb-c482-433d-bce9-2b591b8e855e@infradead.org>
On 12/01/23 at 11:53am, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 11/30/23 18:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20231130:
> >
>
> on riscv 32-bit or 64-bit, with
> # CONFIG_MMU is not set
Thanks for providing the kernel config to ease reproduction. In the config,
there are:
CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
......
# CONFIG_MMU is not set
After investigation, I found this happened after Ignat's patch:
commit 1c7a3fa49ef7 ("kexec: drop dependency on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC from CRASH_DUMP")
Copy above commit change here for reference, and also risc-v's
ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC depends on MMU:
--------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
index fc38f1ae3a30..946dffa048b7 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ config KEXEC_JUMP
config CRASH_DUMP
bool "kernel crash dumps"
depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
- depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC
select CRASH_CORE
select KEXEC_CORE
help
arch/riscv/Kconfig
---------------------
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC
def_bool MMU
Before Ignat's patch, once CONFIG_MMU is unset, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP,
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, CONFIG_CRASH_CORE are all unset automatically. The
crash_core codes are not compiled. That's why no compiling error is
seen.
After Ignat's patch applied, we can enable CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP,
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, CONFIG_CRASH_CORE independently. However, there are
several macro definitions, such as VA_BITS, VMEMMAP_START, VMEMMAP_END,
MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END are only available when CONFIG_MMU=y.
I made two patches to decouple the kexec/crash code with CONFIG_MMU. Not
sure if risc-v wants that.
Or we can simply add dependency on MMU for ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP.
Then when CONFIG_MMU=n, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP, CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE,
CONFIG_CRASH_CORE will be unset too. Please help check which one need be
taken.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 24c1799e2ec4..03d290da7262 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
def_bool y
+ depends on MMU=y
config ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION
def_bool CRASH_CORE
>
> In file included from ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:3:
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c: In function 'arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo':
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:8:27: error: 'VA_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 8 | VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> | ^~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/crash_core.h:78:64: note: in definition of macro 'VMCOREINFO_NUMBER'
> 78 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(%s)=%ld\n", #name, (long)name)
> | ^~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:8:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 8 | VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> | ^~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/crash_core.h:78:64: note: in definition of macro 'VMCOREINFO_NUMBER'
> 78 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(%s)=%ld\n", #name, (long)name)
> | ^~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:12:58: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
> 12 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_START)=0x%lx\n", VMALLOC_START);
> | ~~^
> | |
> | long unsigned int
> | %x
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:14:64: error: 'VMEMMAP_START' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 14 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_START)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_START);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:15:62: error: 'VMEMMAP_END' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MEMREMAP_ENC'?
> 15 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_END)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_END);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | MEMREMAP_ENC
>
> 64-bit only:
>
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:17:64: error: 'MODULES_VADDR' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 17 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_VADDR)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_VADDR);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:18:62: error: 'MODULES_END' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 18 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_END)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_END);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 2:10 Baoquan He [this message]
2023-12-04 2:10 ` Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core) Baoquan He
2023-12-04 2:10 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-04 2:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv, crash: don't export some symbols when CONFIG_MMU=n Baoquan He
2023-12-04 2:19 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-04 2:19 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-04 19:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-04 19:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-04 19:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-05 7:18 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-05 7:18 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-05 7:18 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-05 17:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-05 17:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-05 17:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-01-20 21:09 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2024-01-20 21:09 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2024-01-20 21:09 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2023-12-04 2:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv, kexec: fix dependency of two items Baoquan He
2023-12-04 2:23 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-04 2:23 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-04 19:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-04 19:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-04 19:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-04 19:11 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 1 (riscv, crash_core) Randy Dunlap
2023-12-04 19:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-04 19:11 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZW00/Cfk47Cc3kGo@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric_devolder@yahoo.com \
--cc=ignat@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.