All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	jsnitsel@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, ddutile@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add missing S2FWB feature detection
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 05:30:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_S0gVMuAqrv3R_v@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408033351.1012411-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:03:51AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> Commit 67e4fe398513 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB for NESTED domains")
> introduced S2FWB usage but omitted the corresponding feature detection.
> As a result, vIOMMU allocation fails on FVP in arm_vsmmu_alloc(), due to
> the following check:
> 
> 	if (!arm_smmu_master_canwbs(master) &&
> 	    !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_S2FWB))
> 		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> 
> This patch adds the missing detection logic to prevent allocation
> failure when S2FWB is supported.
> 
> Fixes: 67e4fe398513 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB for NESTED domains")
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 358072b4e293..c7d297ceabdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -4405,6 +4405,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR3);
>  	if (FIELD_GET(IDR3_RIL, reg))
>  		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV;
> +	if (FIELD_GET(IDR3_FWB, reg))
> +		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_S2FWB;
>  
>  	/* IDR5 */
>  	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR5);

Indeed. Looks like setting the feature flag was missed previously.

Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>

Thanks,
Praan


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08  3:33 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add missing S2FWB feature detection Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-04-08  5:30 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2025-04-08  7:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-04-08 12:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-11 16:03   ` Will Deacon
2025-04-17 14:27 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_S0gVMuAqrv3R_v@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.