From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: use display snapshot mechanism for display irq regs
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:26:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_fxR-5BzubYXZU6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af4ceaac9fd48358db027c866c2d59b463507280.1744208554.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:23:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Move more display specific parts of GPU error logging behind the display
> snapshot interface.
>
> With the display register capture reduced to just one register, DERRMR,
> there's quite a bit of boilerplate here. However, it's still a nice
> abstraction and removes a DISPLAY_VER() usage from core i915. With this
> approach, it's also easy to add to xe as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h | 5 ++++
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c | 5 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 18 ------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h | 1 -
> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> index d2a35e3630b1..f5dc050a6344 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> @@ -2329,3 +2329,31 @@ void intel_display_irq_init(struct intel_display *display)
>
> INIT_WORK(&display->irq.vblank_dc_work, intel_display_vblank_dc_work);
> }
> +
> +struct intel_display_irq_snapshot {
> + u32 derrmr;
> +};
> +
> +struct intel_display_irq_snapshot *
> +intel_display_irq_snapshot_capture(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> + struct intel_display_irq_snapshot *snapshot;
> +
> + snapshot = kzalloc(sizeof(*snapshot), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!snapshot)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 6 && DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20)
Technically we should exclude vlv/chv here (or just exclude all gmch).
IIRC vlv/chv have some kind of other register with a potentially similar
function, but we don't use that anywhere.
> + snapshot->derrmr = intel_de_read(display, DERRMR);
> +
> + return snapshot;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_display_irq_snapshot_print(const struct intel_display_irq_snapshot *snapshot,
> + struct drm_printer *p)
> +{
> + if (!snapshot)
> + return;
> +
> + drm_printf(p, "DERRMR: 0x%08x\n", snapshot->derrmr);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h
> index f72727768351..4f0e27a37854 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
>
> enum pipe;
> struct drm_crtc;
> +struct drm_printer;
> struct intel_display;
> +struct intel_display_irq_snapshot;
>
> void valleyview_enable_display_irqs(struct intel_display *display);
> void valleyview_disable_display_irqs(struct intel_display *display);
> @@ -82,4 +84,7 @@ void intel_display_irq_init(struct intel_display *display);
>
> void i915gm_irq_cstate_wa(struct intel_display *display, bool enable);
>
> +struct intel_display_irq_snapshot *intel_display_irq_snapshot_capture(struct intel_display *display);
> +void intel_display_irq_snapshot_print(const struct intel_display_irq_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p);
> +
> #endif /* __INTEL_DISPLAY_IRQ_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c
> index 25ba043cbb65..66087302fdbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #include "intel_display_core.h"
> #include "intel_display_device.h"
> +#include "intel_display_irq.h"
> #include "intel_display_params.h"
> #include "intel_display_snapshot.h"
> #include "intel_dmc.h"
> @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ struct intel_display_snapshot {
> struct intel_display_params params;
> struct intel_overlay_snapshot *overlay;
> struct intel_dmc_snapshot *dmc;
> + struct intel_display_irq_snapshot *irq;
> };
>
> struct intel_display_snapshot *intel_display_snapshot_capture(struct intel_display *display)
> @@ -38,6 +40,7 @@ struct intel_display_snapshot *intel_display_snapshot_capture(struct intel_displ
>
> intel_display_params_copy(&snapshot->params);
>
> + snapshot->irq = intel_display_irq_snapshot_capture(display);
> snapshot->overlay = intel_overlay_snapshot_capture(display);
> snapshot->dmc = intel_dmc_snapshot_capture(display);
>
> @@ -57,6 +60,7 @@ void intel_display_snapshot_print(const struct intel_display_snapshot *snapshot,
> intel_display_device_info_print(&snapshot->info, &snapshot->runtime_info, p);
> intel_display_params_dump(&snapshot->params, display->drm->driver->name, p);
>
> + intel_display_irq_snapshot_print(snapshot->irq, p);
> intel_overlay_snapshot_print(snapshot->overlay, p);
> intel_dmc_snapshot_print(snapshot->dmc, p);
> }
> @@ -68,6 +72,7 @@ void intel_display_snapshot_free(struct intel_display_snapshot *snapshot)
>
> intel_display_params_free(&snapshot->params);
>
> + kfree(snapshot->irq);
> kfree(snapshot->overlay);
> kfree(snapshot->dmc);
> kfree(snapshot);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index 50cd0c433e6d..62e4a293ed9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -726,12 +726,6 @@ static void err_print_gt_info(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> intel_sseu_print_topology(gt->_gt->i915, >->info.sseu, &p);
> }
>
> -static void err_print_gt_display(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> - struct intel_gt_coredump *gt)
> -{
> - err_printf(m, "DERRMR: 0x%08x\n", gt->derrmr);
> -}
> -
> static void err_print_gt_global_nonguc(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> struct intel_gt_coredump *gt)
> {
> @@ -877,7 +871,6 @@ static void __err_print_to_sgl(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> if (error->gt->uc && error->gt->uc->guc.is_guc_capture)
> print_guc_capture = true;
>
> - err_print_gt_display(m, error->gt);
> err_print_gt_global_nonguc(m, error->gt);
> err_print_gt_fences(m, error->gt);
>
> @@ -1766,16 +1759,6 @@ gt_record_uc(struct intel_gt_coredump *gt,
> return error_uc;
> }
>
> -/* Capture display registers. */
> -static void gt_record_display_regs(struct intel_gt_coredump *gt)
> -{
> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->_gt->uncore;
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
> -
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 6 && DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20)
> - gt->derrmr = intel_uncore_read(uncore, DERRMR);
> -}
> -
> /* Capture all other registers that GuC doesn't capture. */
> static void gt_record_global_nonguc_regs(struct intel_gt_coredump *gt)
> {
> @@ -2034,7 +2017,6 @@ intel_gt_coredump_alloc(struct intel_gt *gt, gfp_t gfp, u32 dump_flags)
> gc->_gt = gt;
> gc->awake = intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt);
>
> - gt_record_display_regs(gc);
> gt_record_global_nonguc_regs(gc);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h
> index ac55603a81d7..004e7ad52a4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h
> @@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ struct intel_gt_coredump {
> u32 clock_period_ns;
>
> /* Display related */
That comment should be nuked as well.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> - u32 derrmr;
> u32 sfc_done[I915_MAX_SFC]; /* gen12 */
>
> u32 nfence;
> --
> 2.39.5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 14:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915: error capture cleanups and refactor Jani Nikula
2025-04-09 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: use 32-bit access for gen2 irq registers Jani Nikula
2025-04-10 16:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-09 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: record GEN2_IER in gtier[0] for pre-ilk error capture Jani Nikula
2025-04-10 16:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-09 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: stop recording IER in " Jani Nikula
2025-04-10 16:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-09 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: use display snapshot mechanism for display irq regs Jani Nikula
2025-04-10 16:26 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-04-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Jani Nikula
2025-04-09 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: use graphics version instead of PCH split in error capture Jani Nikula
2025-04-11 9:45 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-11 13:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-09 14:39 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: error capture cleanups and refactor Patchwork
2025-04-09 14:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-09 14:41 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-09 14:57 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-09 14:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-09 14:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-04-09 15:24 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-09 23:37 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-10 8:20 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success " Patchwork
2025-04-10 8:20 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-10 8:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-10 8:30 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-10 8:32 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-10 8:34 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-10 8:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-10 10:57 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-11 7:08 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: don't capture DERRMR for VLV/CHV Jani Nikula
2025-04-11 7:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-11 7:15 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: don't capture DERRMR for VLV/CHV (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-11 7:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-11 7:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-11 7:24 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-11 7:27 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-11 7:28 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-11 7:47 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-11 9:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-11 9:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-04-11 9:27 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-11 9:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_fxR-5BzubYXZU6@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.