From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Mario Limonciello" <superm1@kernel.org>,
"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Yazen Ghannam" <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Shyam Sundar S K" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC"
<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:AMD PMC DRIVER" <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: piix4: Move SB800_PIIX4_FCH_PM_ADDR definition to amd_node.h
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 21:44:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_rCuLD56IZ4hsNw@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411124157.GDZ_kOFfsGgY4zUXA5@fat_crate.local>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 07:09:56AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > I was aiming for a header that we would conceivably use in all these places
> > anyway.
> >
> > Can you suggest a more fitting existing header? A new one felt too heavy
> > for a single register define.
>
> No, the logic is: put it in the *right* header. Not in the "whatever-works"
> header.
Yeah, it's the Linux kernel equivalent of: 'if you touch it, you own it',
a.k.a. 'no good deed goes unpunished'. ;-)
> So you can easily add a
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/platform.h
>
> header which contains exactly platform stuff. And FCH sounds like a platform
> thing to me. Or at least southbridge or whatever that thing is called now. It
> certainly ain't part of the CPU so platform should be more fitting.
>
> Unless someone has a better idea...
Yeah, so I think we can create a brand new <asm/amd_sb.h> header or so,
because it's an AMD SB800 southbridge chipset register? We already have
<asm/amd_nb.h>.
'platform' might be a bit too generic and fungible I think: often the
northbridge and the CPU is considered part of a 'platform' too.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-12 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 20:01 [PATCH v3 0/4] AMD Zen debugging documentation Mario Limonciello
2025-04-10 20:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: Add AMD Zen debugging document Mario Limonciello
2025-04-12 2:12 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-12 2:19 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-12 2:28 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-10 20:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: piix4: Move SB800_PIIX4_FCH_PM_ADDR definition to amd_node.h Mario Limonciello
2025-04-11 11:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-11 12:09 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-11 12:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-12 19:44 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-04-12 19:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-12 20:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-12 20:23 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-12 20:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-12 22:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-13 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-13 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-13 19:27 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-13 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-11 21:15 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-11 21:56 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-10 20:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/x86/amd: pmc: use FCH_PM_BASE definition Mario Limonciello
2025-04-10 20:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/CPU/AMD: Print the reason for the last reset Mario Limonciello
2025-04-11 12:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-11 12:12 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-11 12:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-11 13:25 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-12 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_rCuLD56IZ4hsNw@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.