From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
Ben Horgan <Ben.Horgan@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:27:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Za8WFHxVQZ44fJJn@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkwtNa_-t0f5rhTh5mtF72urKNyqWk0_qfbBwSCQK_6eOg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 01:02:08PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 10:51, Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/2024 6:01 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
> > > converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
> > >
> > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - None.
> > >
> > > Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
> > > Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > > Ulf Hansson
> >
> > Tested-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
> >
>
> Thanks for the leg-work on this. I'll pick this up in rc1 later this week.
Looking at the other files in this set, Ulf of perhaps Bjorn should take this
set.
for:
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>
> > Iulia
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +++++-----------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > index 8bb293b9f327..3161f14442bc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
> > >
> > > static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
> > >
> > > struct imx_rproc {
> > > struct device *dev;
> > > @@ -113,10 +112,8 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > > u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
> > > u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
> > > u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
> > > - int num_pd;
> > > u32 core_index;
> > > - struct device **pd_dev;
> > > - struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
> > > + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > > @@ -853,7 +850,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
> > > - imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
> > > + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -880,72 +877,20 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > > static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > > - int ret, i;
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > > - * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > > - */
> > > - priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
> > > - "#power-domain-cells");
> > > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > > - return 0;
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
> > > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > > -
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > > - priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
> > > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
> > > - goto detach_pd;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> > > - DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto detach_pd;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > -
> > > -detach_pd:
> > > - while (--i >= 0) {
> > > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return ret;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > -{
> > > - struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > > - int i;
> > > + int ret;
> > > + struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
> > > + .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON,
> > > + };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > > * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > > */
> > > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > > + if (dev->pm_domain)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > + ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &priv->pd_list);
> > > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
Ben Horgan <Ben.Horgan@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:27:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Za8WFHxVQZ44fJJn@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkwtNa_-t0f5rhTh5mtF72urKNyqWk0_qfbBwSCQK_6eOg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 01:02:08PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 10:51, Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/2024 6:01 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
> > > converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
> > >
> > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - None.
> > >
> > > Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
> > > Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > > Ulf Hansson
> >
> > Tested-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
> >
>
> Thanks for the leg-work on this. I'll pick this up in rc1 later this week.
Looking at the other files in this set, Ulf of perhaps Bjorn should take this
set.
for:
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>
> > Iulia
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +++++-----------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > index 8bb293b9f327..3161f14442bc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
> > >
> > > static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc);
> > >
> > > struct imx_rproc {
> > > struct device *dev;
> > > @@ -113,10 +112,8 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > > u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
> > > u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
> > > u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
> > > - int num_pd;
> > > u32 core_index;
> > > - struct device **pd_dev;
> > > - struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
> > > + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > > @@ -853,7 +850,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) {
> > > - imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc);
> > > + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -880,72 +877,20 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > > static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > > - int ret, i;
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > > - * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > > - */
> > > - priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
> > > - "#power-domain-cells");
> > > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > > - return 0;
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
> > > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > > -
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > > - priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
> > > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
> > > - goto detach_pd;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> > > - DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
> > > - if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto detach_pd;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > -
> > > -detach_pd:
> > > - while (--i >= 0) {
> > > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return ret;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > -{
> > > - struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > > - int i;
> > > + int ret;
> > > + struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
> > > + .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON,
> > > + };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
> > > * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
> > > */
> > > - if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
> > > + if (dev->pm_domain)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
> > > - device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
> > > - dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > + ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &priv->pd_list);
> > > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-05 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: domains: Add helpers for multi PM domains to avoid open-coding Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:00 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PM: domains: Add helper functions to attach/detach multiple PM domains Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:00 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list() Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-22 17:50 ` Iuliana Prodan
2024-01-22 17:50 ` Iuliana Prodan
2024-01-05 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: " Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-22 17:50 ` Iuliana Prodan
2024-01-22 17:50 ` Iuliana Prodan
2024-01-22 20:02 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-22 20:02 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-23 1:27 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2024-01-23 1:27 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-23 12:37 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-23 12:37 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_adsp: " Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] media: venus: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list() for vcodec Ulf Hansson
2024-01-05 16:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-08 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: domains: Add helpers for multi PM domains to avoid open-coding Daniel Baluta
2024-01-08 8:43 ` Daniel Baluta
2024-01-12 11:10 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-12 11:10 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-26 16:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-26 16:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-01-26 19:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-26 19:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Za8WFHxVQZ44fJJn@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=Ben.Horgan@arm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iuliana.prodan@nxp.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=psodagud@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.