From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, masahiroy@kernel.org,
nicolas@fjasle.eu, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] arm64: Kconfig: Clean up tautological LLVM version checks
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:00:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbPlFGHjJg9X_pHt@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240126161025.GA3265550@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:10:25AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:59:55PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:55:11PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> > > bool "Build big-endian kernel"
> > > - depends on !LD_IS_LLD || LLD_VERSION >= 130000
> > > # https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1379b150991f70a5782e9a143c2ba5308da1161c
> >
> > We can delete the URL here, since that was just to describe why this depended
> > upon LLVM 13+; it's weird for it to sit here on its own.
>
> I think this is the URL for the fix for the problem brought up by
> commit 146a15b87335 ("arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM
> IAS 15.x or newer"), so I think it should stay? It does not look like I
> ever added a link or context for the LLD line, I definitely should have.
Whoops; I clearly misread that, and yes it should stay.
Sorry about that; for the patch as-is:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, masahiroy@kernel.org,
nicolas@fjasle.eu, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] arm64: Kconfig: Clean up tautological LLVM version checks
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:00:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbPlFGHjJg9X_pHt@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240126161025.GA3265550@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:10:25AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:59:55PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:55:11PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> > > bool "Build big-endian kernel"
> > > - depends on !LD_IS_LLD || LLD_VERSION >= 130000
> > > # https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1379b150991f70a5782e9a143c2ba5308da1161c
> >
> > We can delete the URL here, since that was just to describe why this depended
> > upon LLVM 13+; it's weird for it to sit here on its own.
>
> I think this is the URL for the fix for the problem brought up by
> commit 146a15b87335 ("arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM
> IAS 15.x or newer"), so I think it should stay? It does not look like I
> ever added a link or context for the LLD line, I definitely should have.
Whoops; I clearly misread that, and yes it should stay.
Sorry about that; for the patch as-is:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 22:55 [PATCH 00/11] Bump the minimum supported version of LLVM to 13.0.1 Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] kbuild: Raise " Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] Makefile: Drop warn-stack-size plugin opt Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86: Drop stack-alignment " Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: Remove Thumb2 __builtin_thread_pointer workaround for Clang Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-26 8:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-01-26 8:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm64: Kconfig: Clean up tautological LLVM version checks Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-26 12:59 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-26 12:59 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-26 16:10 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-26 16:10 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-26 17:00 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-01-26 17:00 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 06/11] powerpc: Kconfig: Remove tautology in CONFIG_COMPAT Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 07/11] riscv: Remove MCOUNT_NAME workaround Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 08/11] riscv: Kconfig: Remove version dependency from CONFIG_CLANG_SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_FTRACE Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] fortify: Drop Clang version check for 12.0.1 or newer Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 23:09 ` Kees Cook
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] lib/Kconfig.debug: Update Clang version check in CONFIG_KCOV Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] compiler-clang.h: Update __diag_clang() macros for minimum version bump Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 23:10 ` [PATCH 00/11] Bump the minimum supported version of LLVM to 13.0.1 Kees Cook
2024-01-25 23:10 ` Kees Cook
2024-01-25 23:10 ` Kees Cook
2024-01-25 23:10 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-25 4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2024-03-25 4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2024-03-25 4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2024-03-25 4:42 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbPlFGHjJg9X_pHt@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.