All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Wenjie <qwjhust@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hustqwj@hust.edu.cn,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix max open zone constraints
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbQ7XmFpAMSXslkU@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109035804.642-1-qwjhust@gmail.com>

On 01/09, Wenjie wrote:
> From: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>
> 
> 1. If the max active zones of zoned devices are less than
> the active logs of F2FS, the device may error due to
> insufficient zone resources when multiple active logs are
> being written at the same time.
> 
> 2. We can get the number of remaining available zone
> resources by subtracting the number of active logs from
> the number of max active zones of zoned devices.  We can
> use these available zone resources to reduce the number
> of pending bio when switching zones.
> 
> 3. The original code for determining zone end was
> after "out":, which would have missed some fio's
> where is_end_zone_blkaddr(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr)
> was true. I've moved this code before "skip:" to
> make sure it's done for each fio.

Could you please keep #3 as a separate patch?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c  | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/super.c |  9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index dce8defdf4c7..6b11364e94b8 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -392,6 +392,19 @@ static void f2fs_zone_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>  	complete(&io->zone_wait);
>  	f2fs_write_end_io(bio);
>  }
> +
> +static void f2fs_zone_write_end_io_nowait(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_IOSTAT
> +	struct bio_iostat_ctx *iostat_ctx = bio->bi_private;
> +	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = iostat_ctx->sbi;
> +#else
> +	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = (struct f2fs_sb_info *)bio->bi_private;
> +#endif
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&sbi->available_active_zones);
> +	f2fs_write_end_io(bio);
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  struct block_device *f2fs_target_device(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> @@ -1080,22 +1093,27 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	io->last_block_in_bio = fio->new_blkaddr;
>  
>  	trace_f2fs_submit_page_write(fio->page, fio);
> -skip:
> -	if (fio->in_list)
> -		goto next;
> -out:
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>  	if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && btype < META &&
>  			is_end_zone_blkaddr(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr)) {
> -		bio_get(io->bio);
> -		reinit_completion(&io->zone_wait);
> -		io->bi_private = io->bio->bi_private;
> -		io->bio->bi_private = io;
> -		io->bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_zone_write_end_io;
> -		io->zone_pending_bio = io->bio;
> +		if (!atomic_add_negative(-1, &sbi->available_active_zones)) {
> +			io->bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_zone_write_end_io_nowait;
> +		} else {
> +			atomic_inc(&sbi->available_active_zones);
> +			bio_get(io->bio);
> +			reinit_completion(&io->zone_wait);
> +			io->bi_private = io->bio->bi_private;
> +			io->bio->bi_private = io;
> +			io->bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_zone_write_end_io;
> +			io->zone_pending_bio = io->bio;
> +		}
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
>  	}
>  #endif
> +skip:
> +	if (fio->in_list)
> +		goto next;
> +out:
>  	if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN) ||
>  				!f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready(sbi))
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 65294e3b0bef..1b1833e1d10e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,8 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>  	unsigned int blocks_per_blkz;		/* F2FS blocks per zone */
> +	unsigned int max_active_zones;		/* max zone resources of the zoned device */
> +	atomic_t available_active_zones;		/* remaining zone resources */
>  #endif
>  
>  	/* for node-related operations */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 206d03c82d96..c79919425d63 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -3932,6 +3932,15 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi)
>  	if (!f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	sbi->max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev);
> +	if (sbi->max_active_zones && (sbi->max_active_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs)) {
> +		f2fs_err(sbi,
> +			"zoned: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
> +				 sbi->max_active_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	atomic_set(&sbi->available_active_zones, sbi->max_active_zones - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs);
> +
>  	zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev);
>  	if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) {
>  		f2fs_err(sbi, "F2FS does not support non power of 2 zone sizes\n");
> -- 
> 2.34.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Wenjie <qwjhust@gmail.com>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, guoweichao@oppo.com,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hustqwj@hust.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix max open zone constraints
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbQ7XmFpAMSXslkU@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109035804.642-1-qwjhust@gmail.com>

On 01/09, Wenjie wrote:
> From: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>
> 
> 1. If the max active zones of zoned devices are less than
> the active logs of F2FS, the device may error due to
> insufficient zone resources when multiple active logs are
> being written at the same time.
> 
> 2. We can get the number of remaining available zone
> resources by subtracting the number of active logs from
> the number of max active zones of zoned devices.  We can
> use these available zone resources to reduce the number
> of pending bio when switching zones.
> 
> 3. The original code for determining zone end was
> after "out":, which would have missed some fio's
> where is_end_zone_blkaddr(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr)
> was true. I've moved this code before "skip:" to
> make sure it's done for each fio.

Could you please keep #3 as a separate patch?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c  | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/super.c |  9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index dce8defdf4c7..6b11364e94b8 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -392,6 +392,19 @@ static void f2fs_zone_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>  	complete(&io->zone_wait);
>  	f2fs_write_end_io(bio);
>  }
> +
> +static void f2fs_zone_write_end_io_nowait(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_IOSTAT
> +	struct bio_iostat_ctx *iostat_ctx = bio->bi_private;
> +	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = iostat_ctx->sbi;
> +#else
> +	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = (struct f2fs_sb_info *)bio->bi_private;
> +#endif
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&sbi->available_active_zones);
> +	f2fs_write_end_io(bio);
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  struct block_device *f2fs_target_device(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> @@ -1080,22 +1093,27 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	io->last_block_in_bio = fio->new_blkaddr;
>  
>  	trace_f2fs_submit_page_write(fio->page, fio);
> -skip:
> -	if (fio->in_list)
> -		goto next;
> -out:
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>  	if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && btype < META &&
>  			is_end_zone_blkaddr(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr)) {
> -		bio_get(io->bio);
> -		reinit_completion(&io->zone_wait);
> -		io->bi_private = io->bio->bi_private;
> -		io->bio->bi_private = io;
> -		io->bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_zone_write_end_io;
> -		io->zone_pending_bio = io->bio;
> +		if (!atomic_add_negative(-1, &sbi->available_active_zones)) {
> +			io->bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_zone_write_end_io_nowait;
> +		} else {
> +			atomic_inc(&sbi->available_active_zones);
> +			bio_get(io->bio);
> +			reinit_completion(&io->zone_wait);
> +			io->bi_private = io->bio->bi_private;
> +			io->bio->bi_private = io;
> +			io->bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_zone_write_end_io;
> +			io->zone_pending_bio = io->bio;
> +		}
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
>  	}
>  #endif
> +skip:
> +	if (fio->in_list)
> +		goto next;
> +out:
>  	if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN) ||
>  				!f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready(sbi))
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 65294e3b0bef..1b1833e1d10e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,8 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>  	unsigned int blocks_per_blkz;		/* F2FS blocks per zone */
> +	unsigned int max_active_zones;		/* max zone resources of the zoned device */
> +	atomic_t available_active_zones;		/* remaining zone resources */
>  #endif
>  
>  	/* for node-related operations */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 206d03c82d96..c79919425d63 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -3932,6 +3932,15 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi)
>  	if (!f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	sbi->max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev);
> +	if (sbi->max_active_zones && (sbi->max_active_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs)) {
> +		f2fs_err(sbi,
> +			"zoned: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
> +				 sbi->max_active_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	atomic_set(&sbi->available_active_zones, sbi->max_active_zones - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs);
> +
>  	zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev);
>  	if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) {
>  		f2fs_err(sbi, "F2FS does not support non power of 2 zone sizes\n");
> -- 
> 2.34.1

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-09  3:58 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix max open zone constraints Wenjie
2024-01-09  3:58 ` Wenjie
2024-01-26 23:08 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2024-01-26 23:08   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-01-27  2:07   ` [f2fs-dev] " Wenjie Qi
2024-01-27  2:07     ` Wenjie Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbQ7XmFpAMSXslkU@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=hustqwj@hust.edu.cn \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qwjhust@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.