All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] KVM: arm64: Add feature checking helpers
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 19:05:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbQCi_GZ6XuMx49a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122201852.262057-3-maz@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:18:29PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to make it easier to check whether a particular feature
> is exposed to a guest, add a new set of helpers, with kvm_has_feat()
> being the most useful.
> 
> Follow-up work will make heavy use of these.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

I very much like the way these helpers appear to work. However, I
noticed there are still a few places where we are doing explicit feature
checks against register values instead of using the macros, did you want
to address these?

Using kvm_has_feat() consistently in KVM will hopefully drive the point
home that this is the way we want to see things done going forward.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 3d9467ff73bc..925522470b2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -64,12 +64,11 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	u64 mask = ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1 | ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL0 |
 		   kvm_pmu_event_mask(kvm);
-	u64 pfr0 = IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
 
-	if (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, pfr0))
+	if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, IMP))
 		mask |= ARMV8_PMU_INCLUDE_EL2;
 
-	if (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, pfr0))
+	if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, IMP))
 		mask |= ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_NS_EL0 |
 			ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_NS_EL1 |
 			ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL3;
@@ -83,8 +82,10 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
  */
 static bool kvm_pmc_is_64bit(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 {
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
+
 	return (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX ||
-		kvm_pmu_is_3p5(kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc)));
+		kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer, V3P5));
 }
 
 static bool kvm_pmc_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
@@ -556,7 +557,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 		return;
 
 	/* Fixup PMCR_EL0 to reconcile the PMU version and the LP bit */
-	if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
+	if (!kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer, V3P5))
 		val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
 
 	/* The reset bits don't indicate any state, and shouldn't be saved. */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 30253bd19917..955eb06f821d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -505,10 +505,9 @@ static bool trap_loregion(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	u64 val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1);
 	u32 sr = reg_to_encoding(r);
 
-	if (!(val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1_LO_SHIFT))) {
+	if (!kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, LO, IMP)) {
 		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
 		return false;
 	}
@@ -2737,8 +2736,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgdidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
 	} else {
 		u64 dfr = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
-		u64 pfr = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
-		u32 el3 = !!SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, pfr);
+		u32 el3 = kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, IMP);
 
 		p->regval = ((SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, WRPs, dfr) << 28) |
 			     (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, BRPs, dfr) << 24) |
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index 4b9d8fb393a8..eb4c369a79eb 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -90,16 +90,6 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0(void);
 			vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events();	\
 	} while (0)
 
-/*
- * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
- */
-#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) ({						\
-	u64 val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);		\
-	u8 pmuver = SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer, val);	\
-									\
-	pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5;				\
-})
-
 u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void);
 u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_arm_set_default_pmu(struct kvm *kvm);
@@ -168,7 +158,6 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
 }
 
 #define kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)		({ false; })
-#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)		({ false; })
 static inline void kvm_pmu_update_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] KVM: arm64: Add feature checking helpers
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 19:05:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbQCi_GZ6XuMx49a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122201852.262057-3-maz@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:18:29PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to make it easier to check whether a particular feature
> is exposed to a guest, add a new set of helpers, with kvm_has_feat()
> being the most useful.
> 
> Follow-up work will make heavy use of these.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

I very much like the way these helpers appear to work. However, I
noticed there are still a few places where we are doing explicit feature
checks against register values instead of using the macros, did you want
to address these?

Using kvm_has_feat() consistently in KVM will hopefully drive the point
home that this is the way we want to see things done going forward.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 3d9467ff73bc..925522470b2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -64,12 +64,11 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	u64 mask = ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1 | ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL0 |
 		   kvm_pmu_event_mask(kvm);
-	u64 pfr0 = IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
 
-	if (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, pfr0))
+	if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, IMP))
 		mask |= ARMV8_PMU_INCLUDE_EL2;
 
-	if (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, pfr0))
+	if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, IMP))
 		mask |= ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_NS_EL0 |
 			ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_NS_EL1 |
 			ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL3;
@@ -83,8 +82,10 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
  */
 static bool kvm_pmc_is_64bit(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 {
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
+
 	return (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX ||
-		kvm_pmu_is_3p5(kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc)));
+		kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer, V3P5));
 }
 
 static bool kvm_pmc_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
@@ -556,7 +557,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 		return;
 
 	/* Fixup PMCR_EL0 to reconcile the PMU version and the LP bit */
-	if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
+	if (!kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer, V3P5))
 		val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
 
 	/* The reset bits don't indicate any state, and shouldn't be saved. */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 30253bd19917..955eb06f821d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -505,10 +505,9 @@ static bool trap_loregion(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	u64 val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1);
 	u32 sr = reg_to_encoding(r);
 
-	if (!(val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1_LO_SHIFT))) {
+	if (!kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, LO, IMP)) {
 		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
 		return false;
 	}
@@ -2737,8 +2736,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgdidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
 	} else {
 		u64 dfr = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
-		u64 pfr = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
-		u32 el3 = !!SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, pfr);
+		u32 el3 = kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, IMP);
 
 		p->regval = ((SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, WRPs, dfr) << 28) |
 			     (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, BRPs, dfr) << 24) |
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index 4b9d8fb393a8..eb4c369a79eb 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -90,16 +90,6 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0(void);
 			vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events();	\
 	} while (0)
 
-/*
- * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
- */
-#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) ({						\
-	u64 val = IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);		\
-	u8 pmuver = SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer, val);	\
-									\
-	pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5;				\
-})
-
 u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void);
 u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_arm_set_default_pmu(struct kvm *kvm);
@@ -168,7 +158,6 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
 }
 
 #define kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)		({ false; })
-#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)		({ false; })
 static inline void kvm_pmu_update_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22 20:18 [PATCH 00/25] KVM/arm64: VM configuration enforcement Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 01/25] arm64: sysreg: Add missing ID_AA64ISAR[13]_EL1 fields and variants Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 21:29   ` Mark Brown
2024-01-22 21:29     ` Mark Brown
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 02/25] KVM: arm64: Add feature checking helpers Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-26 19:05   ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-01-26 19:05     ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-30 12:12     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-30 12:12       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 03/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Add sanitising to VNCR-backed sysregs Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 13:48   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 13:48     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 17:33     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 17:33       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 04/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Add sanitising to EL2 configuration registers Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 05/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Add sanitising to VNCR-backed FGT sysregs Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 06/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Add sanitising to VNCR-backed HCRX_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 07/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Drop sanitised_sys_reg() helper Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 14:01   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 14:01     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 08/25] KVM: arm64: Unify HDFG[WR]TR_GROUP FGT identifiers Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 14:14   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 14:14     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 15:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 15:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 17:42       ` Mark Brown
2024-01-23 17:42         ` Mark Brown
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 09/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly handle negative polarity FGTs Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 10/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Turn encoding ranges into discrete XArray stores Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 16:37   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 16:37     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 17:45     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 17:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 11/25] KVM: arm64: Drop the requirement for XARRAY_MULTI Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 15:57   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 15:57     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 12/25] KVM: arm64: nv: Move system instructions to their own sys_reg_desc array Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 16:23   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 16:23     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 13/25] KVM: arm64: Always populate the trap configuration xarray Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 16:25   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 16:25     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 14/25] KVM: arm64: Register AArch64 system register entries with the sysreg xarray Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 16:34   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 16:34     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 16:37     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 16:37       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 17:02       ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 17:02         ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 15/25] KVM: arm64: Use the xarray as the primary sysreg/sysinsn walker Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 16:48   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 16:48     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 16/25] KVM: arm64: Rename __check_nv_sr_forward() to triage_sysreg_trap() Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 16:57   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 16:57     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-30 12:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-30 12:43       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 17/25] KVM: arm64: Add Fine-Grained UNDEF tracking information Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 18/25] KVM: arm64: Propagate and handle Fine-Grained UNDEF bits Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 15:53   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 15:53     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 19/25] KVM: arm64: Move existing feature disabling over to FGU infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 17:16   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-24 17:16     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 20/25] KVM: arm64: Streamline save/restore of HFG[RW]TR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 11:30   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-25 11:30     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 21/25] KVM: arm64: Make TLBI OS/Range UNDEF if not advertised to the guest Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 13:30   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-25 13:30     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-30 12:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-30 12:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 22/25] KVM: arm64: Make PIR{,E0}_EL1 UNDEF if S1PIE is " Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 11:48   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 11:48     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-23 17:51     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-23 17:51       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 23/25] KVM: arm64: Make AMU sysreg UNDEF if FEAT_AMU " Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 13:42   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-25 13:42     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 24/25] KVM: arm64: Make FEAT_MOPS UNDEF if " Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 16:25   ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-25 16:25     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-25 17:35     ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-25 17:35       ` Joey Gouly
2024-01-26  9:17     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-26  9:17       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18 ` [PATCH 25/25] KVM: arm64: Add debugfs file for guest's ID registers Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 20:18   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbQCi_GZ6XuMx49a@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.