From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Fix GUEST_PRINTF() format warnings in ARM code
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:55:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcqFpn9y4eHfkRJX@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcqEk16eBKovb-hb@linux.dev>
Dammit, forgot to actually CC Anup. I'll blame jet lag.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:50:38PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> +cc Anup
>
> FYI -- this patch is touching the arch_timer code. I did a test merge
> with kvm_riscv_queue and there weren't any conflicts, but in case that
> changes this patch will appear on kvm-arm64/misc in my tree.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Oliver
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:46:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Fix a pile of -Wformat warnings in the KVM ARM selftests code, almost all
> > of which are benign "long" versus "long long" issues (selftests are 64-bit
> > only, and the guest printf code treats "ll" the same as "l"). The code
> > itself isn't problematic, but the warnings make it impossible to build ARM
> > selftests with -Werror, which does detect real issues from time to time.
> >
> > Opportunistically have GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG() interpret set_expected,
> > which is a bool, as an unsigned decimal value, i.e. have it print '0' or
> > '1' instead of '0x0' or '0x1'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
--
Thanks,
Oliver
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Fix GUEST_PRINTF() format warnings in ARM code
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:55:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcqFpn9y4eHfkRJX@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcqEk16eBKovb-hb@linux.dev>
Dammit, forgot to actually CC Anup. I'll blame jet lag.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:50:38PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> +cc Anup
>
> FYI -- this patch is touching the arch_timer code. I did a test merge
> with kvm_riscv_queue and there weren't any conflicts, but in case that
> changes this patch will appear on kvm-arm64/misc in my tree.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Oliver
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:46:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Fix a pile of -Wformat warnings in the KVM ARM selftests code, almost all
> > of which are benign "long" versus "long long" issues (selftests are 64-bit
> > only, and the guest printf code treats "ll" the same as "l"). The code
> > itself isn't problematic, but the warnings make it impossible to build ARM
> > selftests with -Werror, which does detect real issues from time to time.
> >
> > Opportunistically have GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG() interpret set_expected,
> > which is a bool, as an unsigned decimal value, i.e. have it print '0' or
> > '1' instead of '0x0' or '0x1'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 23:46 [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Fix GUEST_PRINTF() format warnings in ARM code Sean Christopherson
2024-02-02 23:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-03 22:26 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-03 22:26 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-05 23:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-05 23:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-08 5:00 ` Zenghui Yu
2024-02-08 5:00 ` Zenghui Yu
2024-02-12 20:50 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-12 20:50 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-12 20:55 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-02-12 20:55 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-12 20:56 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-12 20:56 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcqFpn9y4eHfkRJX@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.