From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:52:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdeJyxiTSKtkpHMO@tpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65d7640c7983b_2bd671294c3@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:11:08AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > For systems that use CPU isolation (via nohz_full), creating or destroying
> > a socket with timestamping (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW) might cause a
> > static key to be enabled/disabled. This in turn causes undesired
> > IPIs to isolated CPUs.
>
> This refers to SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, not SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW.
> See also sock_set_timestamping.
Willem,
This test program does trigger the static key change:
int main (void)
{
int option = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW;
int sock_fd;
int ret;
int pid_fd;
pid_t pid;
char buf[50];
...
/* set the timestamping option
* this is to trigger the IPIs that notify all cpus of the change
*/
if (setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP, &option, sizeof (option)) < 0) {
printf("Could not enable timestamping option %x", (unsigned int)option);
close(sock_fd);
return 0;
}
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 10:35 [PATCH] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-22 9:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-22 15:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-02-22 17:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2024-02-22 18:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-16 15:02 Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-16 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdeJyxiTSKtkpHMO@tpad \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.