All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Populate fast channel rate_limit
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:46:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZecGGJrgJ2857FYW@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222135702.2005635-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com>

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:57:00PM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> Arm SCMI spec. v3.2, s4.5.3.12 PERFORMANCE_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL
> defines a per-domain rate_limit for performance requests:
> """
> Rate Limit in microseconds, indicating the minimum time
> required between successive requests. A value of 0
> indicates that this field is not applicable or supported
> on the platform.
> """"
> The field is first defined in SCMI v2.0.
> 
> Add support to fetch this value and advertise it through
> a fast_switch_rate_limit() callback.
>

I did a quick check and these changes doesn't conflict with -next SCMI
content. So if Viresh is happy to pick them up for v6.9,

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Populate fast channel rate_limit
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:46:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZecGGJrgJ2857FYW@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222135702.2005635-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com>

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:57:00PM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> Arm SCMI spec. v3.2, s4.5.3.12 PERFORMANCE_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL
> defines a per-domain rate_limit for performance requests:
> """
> Rate Limit in microseconds, indicating the minimum time
> required between successive requests. A value of 0
> indicates that this field is not applicable or supported
> on the platform.
> """"
> The field is first defined in SCMI v2.0.
> 
> Add support to fetch this value and advertise it through
> a fast_switch_rate_limit() callback.
>

I did a quick check and these changes doesn't conflict with -next SCMI
content. So if Viresh is happy to pick them up for v6.9,

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-22 13:56 [PATCH 0/3] scmi-cpufreq: Set transition_delay_us Pierre Gondois
2024-02-22 13:56 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-02-22 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Populate perf commands rate_limit Pierre Gondois
2024-02-22 13:56   ` Pierre Gondois
2024-03-04  7:55   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-04  7:55     ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-05 11:47   ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-05 11:47     ` Sudeep Holla
2024-02-22 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Populate fast channel rate_limit Pierre Gondois
2024-02-22 13:57   ` Pierre Gondois
2024-03-04  8:00   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-04  8:00     ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-05 11:46   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2024-03-05 11:46     ` Sudeep Holla
2024-02-22 13:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: scmi: Set transition_delay_us Pierre Gondois
2024-02-22 13:57   ` Pierre Gondois
2024-03-04  8:15   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-04  8:15     ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-04  7:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] scmi-cpufreq: " Viresh Kumar
2024-03-04  7:00   ` Viresh Kumar
2024-03-04 11:42   ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-04 11:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-06  5:24     ` Viresh Kumar
2024-03-06  5:24       ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZecGGJrgJ2857FYW@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.