Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Arm remoteproc

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 08:30:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/03/2024 17:42, abdellatif.elkhlifi@arm.com wrote:
> > From: Abdellatif El Khlifi <abdellatif.elkhlifi@arm.com>
> > 
> > introduce the bindings for Arm remoteproc support.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abdellatif El Khlifi <abdellatif.elkhlifi@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/remoteproc/arm,rproc.yaml        | 69 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
> 
> Fix order of patches - bindings are always before the user (see
> submitting bindings doc).
> 
> >  2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/arm,rproc.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/arm,rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/arm,rproc.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..322197158059
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/arm,rproc.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/arm,rproc.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Arm Remoteproc Devices
> 
> That's quite generic... does it applied to all ARM designs?
> 

Nope, it is platform specific. It can't just generically be referred as
Arm Remoteproc for sure.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep