From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Bo Gan <ganboing@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] clocksource/drivers/timer-clint: Add T-Head C9xx clint support
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:31:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgIlXWLymVd8XwFc@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgIj8QQ7zO_eSZcA@xhacker>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 09:25:09AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:22:11PM -0700, Bo Gan wrote:
> > On 3/25/24 9:40 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > The mtimecmp in T-Head C9xx clint only supports 32bit read/write,
> > > implement such support.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c
> > > index 4537c77e623c..71188732e8a3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static unsigned int clint_ipi_irq;
> > > static u64 __iomem *clint_timer_cmp;
> > > static unsigned long clint_timer_freq;
> > > static unsigned int clint_timer_irq;
> > > +static bool is_c900_clint;
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > static void clint_send_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
> > > @@ -88,6 +89,19 @@ static int clint_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > +static int c900_clint_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
> > > + struct clock_event_device *ce)
> > > +{
> > > + void __iomem *r = clint_timer_cmp +
> > > + cpuid_to_hartid_map(smp_processor_id());
> > > + u64 val = clint_get_cycles64() + delta;
> > > +
> > > + csr_set(CSR_IE, IE_TIE);
> > Perhaps you should do a writel_relaxed(-1, r) here. just like openSBI, because the update
> > to mtimecmp is now split into 2 parts.
> > https://github.com/riscv-software-src/opensbi/blob/v1.4/lib/utils/timer/aclint_mtimer.c#L54
>
> Thanks, I also noticed the mtimecmp update on 32bit platforms doesn't
> strictly follow the riscv spec:
>
> # New comparand is in a1:a0.
> li t0, -1
> la t1, mtimecmp
> sw t0, 0(t1) # No smaller than old value.
> sw a1, 4(t1) # No smaller than new value.
> sw a0, 0(t1) # New value.
>
> So A new bug fix patch will be added in v2.
>
wait, I found a similar bug in timer-riscv.c, and since these are fixes,
I'd like to send fixes as a seperate series. I'm cooking the patches
>
> >
> > > + writel_relaxed(val, r);
> > > + writel_relaxed(val >> 32, r + 4);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, clint_clock_event) = {
> > > .name = "clint_clockevent",
> > > .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
> > > @@ -99,6 +113,9 @@ static int clint_timer_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > struct clock_event_device *ce = per_cpu_ptr(&clint_clock_event, cpu);
> > > + if (is_c900_clint)
> > > + ce->set_next_event = c900_clint_clock_next_event;
> > > +
> > > ce->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
> > > clockevents_config_and_register(ce, clint_timer_freq, 100, ULONG_MAX);
> > > @@ -233,5 +250,12 @@ static int __init clint_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *np)
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> > > +static int __init c900_clint_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *np)
> > > +{
> > > + is_c900_clint = true;
> > > + return clint_timer_init_dt(np);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > TIMER_OF_DECLARE(clint_timer, "riscv,clint0", clint_timer_init_dt);
> > > TIMER_OF_DECLARE(clint_timer1, "sifive,clint0", clint_timer_init_dt);
> > > +TIMER_OF_DECLARE(clint_timer2, "thead,c900-clint", clint_timer_init_dt);
> > >
> > Better use a more generic term to describe the fact that mtimecmp doesn't support
> > 64-bit mmio, just like what openSBI is currently doing, instead of making it c900 specific:
>
> This has been mentioned in commit msg, but adding a code comment seems fine.
> >
> > https://github.com/riscv-software-src/opensbi/blob/v1.4/lib/utils/timer/fdt_timer_mtimer.c#L152
> >
> > Then your `is_c900_clint` becomes something like `timecmp_64bit_mmio`.
> >
> > Bo
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Bo Gan <ganboing@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] clocksource/drivers/timer-clint: Add T-Head C9xx clint support
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:31:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgIlXWLymVd8XwFc@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgIj8QQ7zO_eSZcA@xhacker>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 09:25:09AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:22:11PM -0700, Bo Gan wrote:
> > On 3/25/24 9:40 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > The mtimecmp in T-Head C9xx clint only supports 32bit read/write,
> > > implement such support.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c
> > > index 4537c77e623c..71188732e8a3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static unsigned int clint_ipi_irq;
> > > static u64 __iomem *clint_timer_cmp;
> > > static unsigned long clint_timer_freq;
> > > static unsigned int clint_timer_irq;
> > > +static bool is_c900_clint;
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > static void clint_send_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
> > > @@ -88,6 +89,19 @@ static int clint_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > +static int c900_clint_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
> > > + struct clock_event_device *ce)
> > > +{
> > > + void __iomem *r = clint_timer_cmp +
> > > + cpuid_to_hartid_map(smp_processor_id());
> > > + u64 val = clint_get_cycles64() + delta;
> > > +
> > > + csr_set(CSR_IE, IE_TIE);
> > Perhaps you should do a writel_relaxed(-1, r) here. just like openSBI, because the update
> > to mtimecmp is now split into 2 parts.
> > https://github.com/riscv-software-src/opensbi/blob/v1.4/lib/utils/timer/aclint_mtimer.c#L54
>
> Thanks, I also noticed the mtimecmp update on 32bit platforms doesn't
> strictly follow the riscv spec:
>
> # New comparand is in a1:a0.
> li t0, -1
> la t1, mtimecmp
> sw t0, 0(t1) # No smaller than old value.
> sw a1, 4(t1) # No smaller than new value.
> sw a0, 0(t1) # New value.
>
> So A new bug fix patch will be added in v2.
>
wait, I found a similar bug in timer-riscv.c, and since these are fixes,
I'd like to send fixes as a seperate series. I'm cooking the patches
>
> >
> > > + writel_relaxed(val, r);
> > > + writel_relaxed(val >> 32, r + 4);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, clint_clock_event) = {
> > > .name = "clint_clockevent",
> > > .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
> > > @@ -99,6 +113,9 @@ static int clint_timer_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > struct clock_event_device *ce = per_cpu_ptr(&clint_clock_event, cpu);
> > > + if (is_c900_clint)
> > > + ce->set_next_event = c900_clint_clock_next_event;
> > > +
> > > ce->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
> > > clockevents_config_and_register(ce, clint_timer_freq, 100, ULONG_MAX);
> > > @@ -233,5 +250,12 @@ static int __init clint_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *np)
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> > > +static int __init c900_clint_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *np)
> > > +{
> > > + is_c900_clint = true;
> > > + return clint_timer_init_dt(np);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > TIMER_OF_DECLARE(clint_timer, "riscv,clint0", clint_timer_init_dt);
> > > TIMER_OF_DECLARE(clint_timer1, "sifive,clint0", clint_timer_init_dt);
> > > +TIMER_OF_DECLARE(clint_timer2, "thead,c900-clint", clint_timer_init_dt);
> > >
> > Better use a more generic term to describe the fact that mtimecmp doesn't support
> > 64-bit mmio, just like what openSBI is currently doing, instead of making it c900 specific:
>
> This has been mentioned in commit msg, but adding a code comment seems fine.
> >
> > https://github.com/riscv-software-src/opensbi/blob/v1.4/lib/utils/timer/fdt_timer_mtimer.c#L152
> >
> > Then your `is_c900_clint` becomes something like `timecmp_64bit_mmio`.
> >
> > Bo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 16:40 [PATCH 0/5] riscv: improve nommu and timer-clint Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] riscv: nommu: remove PAGE_OFFSET hardcoding Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 22:46 ` Bo Gan
2024-03-25 22:46 ` Bo Gan
2024-03-26 1:28 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 1:28 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 2:32 ` Samuel Holland
2024-03-26 2:32 ` Samuel Holland
2024-03-25 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] riscv: nommu: use CSR_TIME* for get_cycles* implementation Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 2:39 ` Samuel Holland
2024-03-26 2:39 ` Samuel Holland
2024-03-26 16:29 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 16:29 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-27 7:58 ` [External] " yunhui cui
2024-03-27 7:58 ` yunhui cui
2024-03-28 10:11 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-28 10:11 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] clocksource/drivers/timer-clint: Remove clint_time_val Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] clocksource/drivers/timer-clint: Use get_cycles() Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] clocksource/drivers/timer-clint: Add T-Head C9xx clint support Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:50 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 16:50 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-25 22:22 ` Bo Gan
2024-03-25 22:22 ` Bo Gan
2024-03-26 1:25 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 1:25 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 1:31 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2024-03-26 1:31 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 16:33 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-26 16:33 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-03-27 22:53 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-27 22:53 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgIlXWLymVd8XwFc@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ganboing@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.