All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:05:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh6hwjmUQyc_nseG@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aedbc76b3d01e25bea691b61a331f71a7c63f3b3.1712665176.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:26:43PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> As a baby step towards making struct intel_display the main data
> structure for display, add a backpointer to struct drm_device that can
> be used instead of &i915->drm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

I needed that a few weeks ago when doing that display metrics,
willing to add a drm_debug without having to go through
drm_i915_private.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h   | 3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 3 +++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> index db9b6492758e..368a4953bc1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> @@ -282,6 +282,9 @@ struct intel_wm {
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_display {
> +	/* drm device backpointer */
> +	struct drm_device *drm;
> +
>  	/* Display functions */
>  	struct {
>  		/* Top level crtc-ish functions */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> index b8903bd0e82a..120e209ee74a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> @@ -927,6 +927,9 @@ void intel_display_device_probe(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  	const struct intel_display_device_info *info;
>  	u16 ver, rel, step;
>  
> +	/* Add drm device backpointer as early as possible. */
> +	i915->display.drm = &i915->drm;
> +
>  	if (HAS_GMD_ID(i915))
>  		info = probe_gmdid_display(i915, &ver, &rel, &step);
>  	else
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-09 12:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:05   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:06   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display() Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/display: " Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:10   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17  9:53     ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:04       ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:14   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05     ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:16   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05     ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:17   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:55 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:58 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:59 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 13:26 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:26 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-10 17:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-04-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zh6hwjmUQyc_nseG@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.