From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:24:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh6mKo4SltBU99ba@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1712665176.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:26:42PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> v3 of [1], and no longer an RFC.
>
> This is just initial plumbing, and not much in terms of usage (apart
> from patch 7). We could start converting a number of places already, but
> the main blocker atm is that I haven't figured out a decent solution for
> the various IS_<PLATFORM>() check macros.
what about convert them all to DISPLAY_VER?
or perhaps with a legacy way for that like:
s/IS_<PLATFORM>/IS_DISPLAY_PLATFORM
where
#define IS_DISPLAY_PLATFORM DISPLAY_VER(something...)
btw I just noticed we need to convert DISPLAY_VER towards
display rather then device pointer quickly as well.
>
> I'm intentionally keeping the patches small and independent, because
> they could conceivably be backported to stable as dependencies, so we
> don't cause a huge problem for backports.
>
> Anyway, we could start moving things forward with this.
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1709727127.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
>
>
> Jani Nikula (7):
> drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer
> drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro
> drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display()
> drm/xe/display: add generic __to_intel_display()
> drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests
> drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions
> drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct
> intel_display
>
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c | 40 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 102 +++++++++++-------
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 3 +
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 3 +
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 4 +-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 3 +-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 37 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.c | 56 +++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.h | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 ++
> .../gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 11 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c | 1 +
> 15 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 12:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display() Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/display: " Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 9:53 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:04 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:55 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:58 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:59 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 13:26 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:26 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-10 17:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-04-16 16:24 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh6mKo4SltBU99ba@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.