From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Michal Tomek <mtdev79b@gmail.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Jon Lin <jon.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:03:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkAB6goB4TmcmWu@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411130150.128107-1-cassel@kernel.org>
Hi Niklas,
On 11-04-24, 15:01, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> This series is based on: linux-phy phy/fixes
> (Since there are other rockchip,pcie3-phy changes there that have not
> yet reached mainline and which would otherwise have caused conflicts.)
I merged the fixes into next and tried to apply this patch but second
one fails for me. I guess it needs to be rebased.
Always based these changes on phy/next or phy/fixes+next (which is what
I will end up with to resolve)
--
~Vinod
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Michal Tomek <mtdev79b@gmail.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Jon Lin <jon.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:03:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkAB6goB4TmcmWu@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411130150.128107-1-cassel@kernel.org>
Hi Niklas,
On 11-04-24, 15:01, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> This series is based on: linux-phy phy/fixes
> (Since there are other rockchip,pcie3-phy changes there that have not
> yet reached mainline and which would otherwise have caused conflicts.)
I merged the fixes into next and tried to apply this patch but second
one fails for me. I guess it needs to be rebased.
Always based these changes on phy/next or phy/fixes+next (which is what
I will end up with to resolve)
--
~Vinod
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Michal Tomek <mtdev79b@gmail.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Jon Lin <jon.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:03:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkAB6goB4TmcmWu@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411130150.128107-1-cassel@kernel.org>
Hi Niklas,
On 11-04-24, 15:01, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> This series is based on: linux-phy phy/fixes
> (Since there are other rockchip,pcie3-phy changes there that have not
> yet reached mainline and which would otherwise have caused conflicts.)
I merged the fixes into next and tried to apply this patch but second
one fails for me. I guess it needs to be rebased.
Always based these changes on phy/next or phy/fixes+next (which is what
I will end up with to resolve)
--
~Vinod
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Michal Tomek <mtdev79b@gmail.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Jon Lin <jon.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:03:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkAB6goB4TmcmWu@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411130150.128107-1-cassel@kernel.org>
Hi Niklas,
On 11-04-24, 15:01, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> This series is based on: linux-phy phy/fixes
> (Since there are other rockchip,pcie3-phy changes there that have not
> yet reached mainline and which would otherwise have caused conflicts.)
I merged the fixes into next and tried to apply this patch but second
one fails for me. I guess it needs to be rebased.
Always based these changes on phy/next or phy/fixes+next (which is what
I will end up with to resolve)
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 13:01 [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,pcie3-phy: add rockchip,rx-common-refclk-mode Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 7:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-12 7:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-12 7:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-12 7:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-11 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] phy: rockchip-snps-pcie3: add support for rockchip,rx-common-refclk-mode Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 9:33 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2024-04-12 9:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support Vinod Koul
2024-04-12 9:33 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-12 9:33 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-12 12:42 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 12:42 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 12:42 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 12:42 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-13 6:06 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-13 6:06 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-13 6:06 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-13 6:06 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhkAB6goB4TmcmWu@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jon.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mtdev79b@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.