From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Cc: "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
"hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"linux-imx@nxp.com" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"kishon@kernel.org" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com" <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tharvey@gateworks.com" <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"mkl@pengutronix.de" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: facing pcie link-up instability
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:54:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkZ7R7E9LlfZX-l@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae96ab05b47f9788bce1c8df5a795b35e16a629c.camel@toradex.com>
On 07-04-24, 22:22, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> Hi Vinod
>
> On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 14:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:06:31 +0100, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > > In our automated testing setup, we use Delock Mini-PCIe SATA cards [1].
> > > While this setup has proven very stable overall we noticed upstream on
> > > the i.MX8M Mini fails quite regularly (about 50/50) to bring up the PCIe
> > > link while with NXP's downstream BSP 5.15.71_2.2.2 it always works. As
> > > that old downstream stuff was quite different, I first also tried NXP's
> > > latest downstream BSP 6.1.55_2.2.0 which from a PCIe point of view is
> > > fairly vanilla, however, also there the PCIe link-up was not stable.
> > > Comparing and debugging I noticed that upstream explicitly configures
> > > the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL to I_PLL_REFCLK_FROM_SYSPLL while working
> > > downstream [2] leaving it at reset defaults of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > > Unfortunately, the TRM does not mention any further details about this
> > > register (both for the i.MX 8M Mini as well as the Plus). Maybe somebody
> > > from NXP could further comment on this?
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
> > commit: 3a161017f1de55cc48be81f6156004c151f32677
>
> Sorry, but it is slightly confusing whether v1 or v2 now got applied. I believe v1 but then only the commit
> messages differ. However, please note that only v2 included information on how to proceed concerning
> backporting to stable 6.1.x.
V2 was picked, you can check phy tree
Somehow b4 sent email for v1 as well
--
~Vinod
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Cc: "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
"hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"linux-imx@nxp.com" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"kishon@kernel.org" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com" <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tharvey@gateworks.com" <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"mkl@pengutronix.de" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: facing pcie link-up instability
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:54:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkZ7R7E9LlfZX-l@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae96ab05b47f9788bce1c8df5a795b35e16a629c.camel@toradex.com>
On 07-04-24, 22:22, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> Hi Vinod
>
> On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 14:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:06:31 +0100, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > > In our automated testing setup, we use Delock Mini-PCIe SATA cards [1].
> > > While this setup has proven very stable overall we noticed upstream on
> > > the i.MX8M Mini fails quite regularly (about 50/50) to bring up the PCIe
> > > link while with NXP's downstream BSP 5.15.71_2.2.2 it always works. As
> > > that old downstream stuff was quite different, I first also tried NXP's
> > > latest downstream BSP 6.1.55_2.2.0 which from a PCIe point of view is
> > > fairly vanilla, however, also there the PCIe link-up was not stable.
> > > Comparing and debugging I noticed that upstream explicitly configures
> > > the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL to I_PLL_REFCLK_FROM_SYSPLL while working
> > > downstream [2] leaving it at reset defaults of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > > Unfortunately, the TRM does not mention any further details about this
> > > register (both for the i.MX 8M Mini as well as the Plus). Maybe somebody
> > > from NXP could further comment on this?
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
> > commit: 3a161017f1de55cc48be81f6156004c151f32677
>
> Sorry, but it is slightly confusing whether v1 or v2 now got applied. I believe v1 but then only the commit
> messages differ. However, please note that only v2 included information on how to proceed concerning
> backporting to stable 6.1.x.
V2 was picked, you can check phy tree
Somehow b4 sent email for v1 as well
--
~Vinod
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Cc: "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
"hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"linux-imx@nxp.com" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"kishon@kernel.org" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com" <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tharvey@gateworks.com" <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"mkl@pengutronix.de" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: facing pcie link-up instability
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:54:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhkZ7R7E9LlfZX-l@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae96ab05b47f9788bce1c8df5a795b35e16a629c.camel@toradex.com>
On 07-04-24, 22:22, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> Hi Vinod
>
> On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 14:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:06:31 +0100, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > > In our automated testing setup, we use Delock Mini-PCIe SATA cards [1].
> > > While this setup has proven very stable overall we noticed upstream on
> > > the i.MX8M Mini fails quite regularly (about 50/50) to bring up the PCIe
> > > link while with NXP's downstream BSP 5.15.71_2.2.2 it always works. As
> > > that old downstream stuff was quite different, I first also tried NXP's
> > > latest downstream BSP 6.1.55_2.2.0 which from a PCIe point of view is
> > > fairly vanilla, however, also there the PCIe link-up was not stable.
> > > Comparing and debugging I noticed that upstream explicitly configures
> > > the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL to I_PLL_REFCLK_FROM_SYSPLL while working
> > > downstream [2] leaving it at reset defaults of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > > Unfortunately, the TRM does not mention any further details about this
> > > register (both for the i.MX 8M Mini as well as the Plus). Maybe somebody
> > > from NXP could further comment on this?
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
> > commit: 3a161017f1de55cc48be81f6156004c151f32677
>
> Sorry, but it is slightly confusing whether v1 or v2 now got applied. I believe v1 but then only the commit
> messages differ. However, please note that only v2 included information on how to proceed concerning
> backporting to stable 6.1.x.
V2 was picked, you can check phy tree
Somehow b4 sent email for v1 as well
--
~Vinod
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-22 13:06 [PATCH v1 0/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: facing pcie link-up instability Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-22 13:06 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-22 13:06 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-22 13:06 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix " Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-22 13:06 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-22 13:06 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-25 3:33 ` Hongxing Zhu
2024-03-25 3:33 ` Hongxing Zhu
2024-03-25 3:33 ` Hongxing Zhu
2024-04-06 6:28 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06 6:28 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06 6:28 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06 6:30 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06 6:30 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06 6:30 ` Vinod Koul
2024-03-22 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 0/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: facing " Fabio Estevam
2024-03-22 16:29 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-03-22 16:29 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-04-06 9:18 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06 9:18 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06 9:18 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-07 22:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-04-07 22:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-04-07 22:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-04-12 11:24 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2024-04-12 11:24 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-12 11:24 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-15 20:07 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-04-15 20:07 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-04-15 20:07 ` Marcel Ziswiler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhkZ7R7E9LlfZX-l@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
--cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.