From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] mm/kvm: Improve parallelism for access bit harvesting
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:41:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhmAR1akBHjvZ9_4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240401232946.1837665-1-jthoughton@google.com>
On 2024-04-01 11:29 PM, James Houghton wrote:
> This patchset adds a fast path in KVM to test and clear access bits on
> sptes without taking the mmu_lock. It also adds support for using a
> bitmap to (1) test the access bits for many sptes in a single call to
> mmu_notifier_test_young, and to (2) clear the access bits for many ptes
> in a single call to mmu_notifier_clear_young.
How much improvement would we get if we _just_ made test/clear_young
lockless on x86 and hold the read-lock on arm64? And then how much
benefit does the bitmap look-around add on top of that?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] mm/kvm: Improve parallelism for access bit harvesting
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:41:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhmAR1akBHjvZ9_4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240401232946.1837665-1-jthoughton@google.com>
On 2024-04-01 11:29 PM, James Houghton wrote:
> This patchset adds a fast path in KVM to test and clear access bits on
> sptes without taking the mmu_lock. It also adds support for using a
> bitmap to (1) test the access bits for many sptes in a single call to
> mmu_notifier_test_young, and to (2) clear the access bits for many ptes
> in a single call to mmu_notifier_clear_young.
How much improvement would we get if we _just_ made test/clear_young
lockless on x86 and hold the read-lock on arm64? And then how much
benefit does the bitmap look-around add on top of that?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-01 23:29 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm/kvm: Improve parallelism for access bit harvesting James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: Add a bitmap into mmu_notifier_{clear,test}_young James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-04 18:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-04 18:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 18:31 ` James Houghton
2024-04-09 18:31 ` James Houghton
2024-04-09 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-11 0:35 ` James Houghton
2024-04-11 0:35 ` James Houghton
2024-04-12 18:45 ` David Matlack
2024-04-12 18:45 ` David Matlack
2024-04-19 20:34 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 20:34 ` James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] KVM: Move MMU notifier function declarations James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] KVM: Add basic bitmap support into kvm_mmu_notifier_test/clear_young James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-12 20:28 ` David Matlack
2024-04-12 20:28 ` David Matlack
2024-04-19 20:41 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 20:41 ` James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] KVM: x86: Move tdp_mmu_enabled and shadow_accessed_mask James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: x86: Participate in bitmap-based PTE aging James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-11 17:08 ` David Matlack
2024-04-11 17:08 ` David Matlack
2024-04-11 17:28 ` David Matlack
2024-04-11 17:28 ` David Matlack
2024-04-11 18:00 ` David Matlack
2024-04-11 18:00 ` David Matlack
2024-04-11 18:07 ` David Matlack
2024-04-11 18:07 ` David Matlack
2024-04-19 20:47 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 20:47 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 21:06 ` David Matlack
2024-04-19 21:06 ` David Matlack
2024-04-19 21:48 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 21:48 ` James Houghton
2024-04-21 0:19 ` Yu Zhao
2024-04-21 0:19 ` Yu Zhao
2024-04-12 20:44 ` David Matlack
2024-04-12 20:44 ` David Matlack
2024-04-19 20:54 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 20:54 ` James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] KVM: arm64: " James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-02 4:06 ` Yu Zhao
2024-04-02 4:06 ` Yu Zhao
2024-04-02 7:00 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-02 7:00 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-02 7:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-02 7:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-01 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm: multi-gen LRU: use mmu_notifier_test_clear_young() James Houghton
2024-04-01 23:29 ` James Houghton
2024-04-12 18:41 ` David Matlack [this message]
2024-04-12 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] mm/kvm: Improve parallelism for access bit harvesting David Matlack
2024-04-19 20:57 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 20:57 ` James Houghton
2024-04-19 22:23 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:23 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhmAR1akBHjvZ9_4@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.