From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: enh <enh@google.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs.
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:08:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiaLcRimjNY8F0sF@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJgzZorn5anPH8dVPqvjVWmLKqTi5bkLDR=FH-ZAcdXFnNe8Eg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:18:25PM -0700, enh wrote:
> These only tell you about scalar accesses, not vector accesses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> index b2bcc9eed9aa..239be63f5089 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> @@ -192,21 +192,21 @@ The following keys are defined:
> information about the selected set of processors.
>
> * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN`: The performance of misaligned
> - accesses is unknown.
> + scalar accesses is unknown.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned accesses are
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned scalar
> accesses are
> emulated via software, either in or below the kernel. These accesses are
> always extremely slow.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned accesses are slower
> - than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> + slower than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
> directly in hardware, or trapped and emulated by software.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned accesses are faster
> - than equivalent byte accesses.
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> + faster than equivalent byte accesses.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are
> - not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned scalar accesses
> + are not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
>
> * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
> represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
> --
> 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
- Charlie
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: enh <enh@google.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs.
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:08:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiaLcRimjNY8F0sF@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJgzZorn5anPH8dVPqvjVWmLKqTi5bkLDR=FH-ZAcdXFnNe8Eg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:18:25PM -0700, enh wrote:
> These only tell you about scalar accesses, not vector accesses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> index b2bcc9eed9aa..239be63f5089 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> @@ -192,21 +192,21 @@ The following keys are defined:
> information about the selected set of processors.
>
> * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN`: The performance of misaligned
> - accesses is unknown.
> + scalar accesses is unknown.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned accesses are
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned scalar
> accesses are
> emulated via software, either in or below the kernel. These accesses are
> always extremely slow.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned accesses are slower
> - than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> + slower than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
> directly in hardware, or trapped and emulated by software.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned accesses are faster
> - than equivalent byte accesses.
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> + faster than equivalent byte accesses.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are
> - not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned scalar accesses
> + are not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
>
> * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
> represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
> --
> 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
- Charlie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 19:18 [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs enh
2024-04-11 19:18 ` enh
2024-04-22 16:08 ` Charlie Jenkins [this message]
2024-04-22 16:08 ` Charlie Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiaLcRimjNY8F0sF@ghost \
--to=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.