Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/P2M: un-indent write_p2m_entry()

["Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 04:32:14PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Drop the inner scope that was left from earlier if/else removal. Take
> the opportunity and make the paging_unlock() invocation common to
> success and error paths, though.

TBH I'm not sure I prefer the fact to continue function execution
after an error is found, I specially dislike that you have to add a
!rc check to the nestedhvm conditional block, and because anything
that we further add to the function would also need a !rc check.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

Albeit I do prefer the extra call to paging_unlock() and early return
from the function in case of error.

Thanks, Roger.