* [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size()
@ 2024-04-23 14:32 ` Ma Ke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ma Ke @ 2024-04-23 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vkoul, shawnguo, s.hauer, kernel, festevam
Cc: dmaengine, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Ma Ke
To avoid the failure of dma_set_max_seg_size(), we should check the
return value of the dma_set_max_seg_size().
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>
---
drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
index cfb9962417ef..90cbb9b04b02 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
@@ -798,7 +798,9 @@ static int mxs_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mxs_dma->dma_device.dev = &pdev->dev;
/* mxs_dma gets 65535 bytes maximum sg size */
- dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
+ ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
mxs_dma->dma_device.device_alloc_chan_resources = mxs_dma_alloc_chan_resources;
mxs_dma->dma_device.device_free_chan_resources = mxs_dma_free_chan_resources;
--
2.37.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size()
@ 2024-04-23 14:32 ` Ma Ke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ma Ke @ 2024-04-23 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vkoul, shawnguo, s.hauer, kernel, festevam
Cc: dmaengine, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Ma Ke
To avoid the failure of dma_set_max_seg_size(), we should check the
return value of the dma_set_max_seg_size().
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>
---
drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
index cfb9962417ef..90cbb9b04b02 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
@@ -798,7 +798,9 @@ static int mxs_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mxs_dma->dma_device.dev = &pdev->dev;
/* mxs_dma gets 65535 bytes maximum sg size */
- dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
+ ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
mxs_dma->dma_device.device_alloc_chan_resources = mxs_dma_alloc_chan_resources;
mxs_dma->dma_device.device_free_chan_resources = mxs_dma_free_chan_resources;
--
2.37.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size()
2024-04-23 14:32 ` Ma Ke
@ 2024-04-24 4:07 ` Frank Li
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-04-24 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ma Ke
Cc: vkoul, shawnguo, s.hauer, kernel, festevam, dmaengine, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:32:05PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> To avoid the failure of dma_set_max_seg_size(), we should check the
> return value of the dma_set_max_seg_size().
Check return value of dma_set_max_seg_size() in case it return error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> index cfb9962417ef..90cbb9b04b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> @@ -798,7 +798,9 @@ static int mxs_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mxs_dma->dma_device.dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> /* mxs_dma gets 65535 bytes maximum sg size */
> - dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> + ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
How error happen?
static inline int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev, unsigned int size)
{
if (dev->dma_parms) {
dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size = size;
return 0;
}
return -EIO;
}
Only possible dev->dma_parms is null. but mxs-dma is platform device, it
point to platform's dma_parms field. Look like impossible it is null.
Frank
>
> mxs_dma->dma_device.device_alloc_chan_resources = mxs_dma_alloc_chan_resources;
> mxs_dma->dma_device.device_free_chan_resources = mxs_dma_free_chan_resources;
> --
> 2.37.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size()
@ 2024-04-24 4:07 ` Frank Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-04-24 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ma Ke
Cc: vkoul, shawnguo, s.hauer, kernel, festevam, dmaengine, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:32:05PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> To avoid the failure of dma_set_max_seg_size(), we should check the
> return value of the dma_set_max_seg_size().
Check return value of dma_set_max_seg_size() in case it return error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> index cfb9962417ef..90cbb9b04b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
> @@ -798,7 +798,9 @@ static int mxs_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mxs_dma->dma_device.dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> /* mxs_dma gets 65535 bytes maximum sg size */
> - dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> + ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
How error happen?
static inline int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev, unsigned int size)
{
if (dev->dma_parms) {
dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size = size;
return 0;
}
return -EIO;
}
Only possible dev->dma_parms is null. but mxs-dma is platform device, it
point to platform's dma_parms field. Look like impossible it is null.
Frank
>
> mxs_dma->dma_device.device_alloc_chan_resources = mxs_dma_alloc_chan_resources;
> mxs_dma->dma_device.device_free_chan_resources = mxs_dma_free_chan_resources;
> --
> 2.37.2
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size()
2024-04-24 4:07 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-04-25 9:04 ` Vinod Koul
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2024-04-25 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: Ma Ke, shawnguo, s.hauer, kernel, festevam, dmaengine, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 24-04-24, 00:07, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:32:05PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> > - dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> > + ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> How error happen?
>
> static inline int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev, unsigned int size)
> {
> if (dev->dma_parms) {
> dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size = size;
> return 0;
> }
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> Only possible dev->dma_parms is null. but mxs-dma is platform device, it
> point to platform's dma_parms field. Look like impossible it is null.
Yep, checking for the sake of checking is bad. It needs to be logical
--
~Vinod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size()
@ 2024-04-25 9:04 ` Vinod Koul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2024-04-25 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: Ma Ke, shawnguo, s.hauer, kernel, festevam, dmaengine, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 24-04-24, 00:07, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:32:05PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> > - dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> > + ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(mxs_dma->dma_device.dev, MAX_XFER_BYTES);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> How error happen?
>
> static inline int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev, unsigned int size)
> {
> if (dev->dma_parms) {
> dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size = size;
> return 0;
> }
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> Only possible dev->dma_parms is null. but mxs-dma is platform device, it
> point to platform's dma_parms field. Look like impossible it is null.
Yep, checking for the sake of checking is bad. It needs to be logical
--
~Vinod
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-25 9:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-23 14:32 [PATCH] dmaengine: mxs-dma: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size() Ma Ke
2024-04-23 14:32 ` Ma Ke
2024-04-24 4:07 ` Frank Li
2024-04-24 4:07 ` Frank Li
2024-04-25 9:04 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-25 9:04 ` Vinod Koul
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.