From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, leo.yan@linux.dev,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 18:21:55 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zj0-c7Ac0qHkuLNt@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240509101136.5b0e0f2bf8df640fc2e65624@kernel.org>
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:11:36AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2024 15:14:57 +0100
> James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> > and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so
> > that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing
> > a static cross compile for arm64:
> >
> > $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \
> > EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat"
> >
> > util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops'
> >
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks!
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
> > Fixes: 55442cc2f22d ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops")
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > index c0a492e65388..c9584563cd56 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > @@ -1215,6 +1215,34 @@ static int offset_from_dwarf_op(Dwarf_Op *op)
> > }
> > return -1;
> > }
> > +
> > +static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> > +{
> > + /* The first op is checked separately */
> > + ops++;
> > + nops--;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> > + * register and offset exactly. Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> > + * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> > + * location.
> > + */
> > + while (nops) {
> > + switch (ops->atom) {
> > + case DW_OP_stack_value:
> > + case DW_OP_deref_size:
> > + case DW_OP_deref:
> > + case DW_OP_piece:
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > + ops++;
> > + nops--;
> > + }
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > #endif /* HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT || HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT */
> >
> > #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> > @@ -1395,34 +1423,6 @@ static bool match_var_offset(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, struct find_var_data *data,
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> > -{
> > - /* The first op is checked separately */
> > - ops++;
> > - nops--;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> > - * register and offset exactly. Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> > - * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> > - * location.
> > - */
> > - while (nops) {
> > - switch (ops->atom) {
> > - case DW_OP_stack_value:
> > - case DW_OP_deref_size:
> > - case DW_OP_deref:
> > - case DW_OP_piece:
> > - break;
> > - default:
> > - return false;
> > - }
> > - ops++;
> > - nops--;
> > - }
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > /* Only checks direct child DIEs in the given scope. */
> > static int __die_find_var_reg_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *arg)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-08 14:14 [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT James Clark
2024-05-08 21:04 ` Ian Rogers
2024-05-08 21:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-05-09 1:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-05-09 21:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zj0-c7Ac0qHkuLNt@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.