All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT
@ 2024-05-08 14:14 James Clark
  2024-05-08 21:04 ` Ian Rogers
  2024-05-09  1:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: James Clark @ 2024-05-08 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-perf-users
  Cc: leo.yan, James Clark, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter,
	Liang, Kan, Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel

check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so
that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing
a static cross compile for arm64:

  $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \
    EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat"

  util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops'

Fixes: 55442cc2f22d ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops")
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
index c0a492e65388..c9584563cd56 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
@@ -1215,6 +1215,34 @@ static int offset_from_dwarf_op(Dwarf_Op *op)
 	}
 	return -1;
 }
+
+static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
+{
+	/* The first op is checked separately */
+	ops++;
+	nops--;
+
+	/*
+	 * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
+	 * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
+	 * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
+	 * location.
+	 */
+	while (nops) {
+		switch (ops->atom) {
+		case DW_OP_stack_value:
+		case DW_OP_deref_size:
+		case DW_OP_deref:
+		case DW_OP_piece:
+			break;
+		default:
+			return false;
+		}
+		ops++;
+		nops--;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
 #endif /* HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT || HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT */
 
 #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
@@ -1395,34 +1423,6 @@ static bool match_var_offset(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, struct find_var_data *data,
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
-{
-	/* The first op is checked separately */
-	ops++;
-	nops--;
-
-	/*
-	 * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
-	 * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
-	 * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
-	 * location.
-	 */
-	while (nops) {
-		switch (ops->atom) {
-		case DW_OP_stack_value:
-		case DW_OP_deref_size:
-		case DW_OP_deref:
-		case DW_OP_piece:
-			break;
-		default:
-			return false;
-		}
-		ops++;
-		nops--;
-	}
-	return true;
-}
-
 /* Only checks direct child DIEs in the given scope. */
 static int __die_find_var_reg_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *arg)
 {
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT
  2024-05-08 14:14 [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT James Clark
@ 2024-05-08 21:04 ` Ian Rogers
  2024-05-08 21:10   ` Namhyung Kim
  2024-05-09  1:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2024-05-08 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Clark
  Cc: linux-perf-users, leo.yan, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Liang, Kan,
	Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:15 AM James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:
>
> check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so
> that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing
> a static cross compile for arm64:
>
>   $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \
>     EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat"
>
>   util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops'
>
> Fixes: 55442cc2f22d ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops")
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
(eye-balled to see the #if problem exists and this is the correct fix)

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> index c0a492e65388..c9584563cd56 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> @@ -1215,6 +1215,34 @@ static int offset_from_dwarf_op(Dwarf_Op *op)
>         }
>         return -1;
>  }
> +
> +static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> +{
> +       /* The first op is checked separately */
> +       ops++;
> +       nops--;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> +        * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> +        * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> +        * location.
> +        */
> +       while (nops) {
> +               switch (ops->atom) {
> +               case DW_OP_stack_value:
> +               case DW_OP_deref_size:
> +               case DW_OP_deref:
> +               case DW_OP_piece:
> +                       break;
> +               default:
> +                       return false;
> +               }
> +               ops++;
> +               nops--;
> +       }
> +       return true;
> +}
>  #endif /* HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT || HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT */
>
>  #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> @@ -1395,34 +1423,6 @@ static bool match_var_offset(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, struct find_var_data *data,
>         return true;
>  }
>
> -static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> -{
> -       /* The first op is checked separately */
> -       ops++;
> -       nops--;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> -        * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> -        * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> -        * location.
> -        */
> -       while (nops) {
> -               switch (ops->atom) {
> -               case DW_OP_stack_value:
> -               case DW_OP_deref_size:
> -               case DW_OP_deref:
> -               case DW_OP_piece:
> -                       break;
> -               default:
> -                       return false;
> -               }
> -               ops++;
> -               nops--;
> -       }
> -       return true;
> -}
> -
>  /* Only checks direct child DIEs in the given scope. */
>  static int __die_find_var_reg_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *arg)
>  {
> --
> 2.34.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT
  2024-05-08 21:04 ` Ian Rogers
@ 2024-05-08 21:10   ` Namhyung Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-05-08 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Rogers
  Cc: James Clark, linux-perf-users, leo.yan, Peter Zijlstra,
	Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Liang, Kan,
	Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 2:05 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:15 AM James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> > and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so
> > that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing
> > a static cross compile for arm64:
> >
> >   $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \
> >     EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat"
> >
> >   util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops'
> >
> > Fixes: 55442cc2f22d ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops")
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> (eye-balled to see the #if problem exists and this is the correct fix)

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Namhyung

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT
  2024-05-08 14:14 [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT James Clark
  2024-05-08 21:04 ` Ian Rogers
@ 2024-05-09  1:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
  2024-05-09 21:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-05-09  1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Clark
  Cc: linux-perf-users, leo.yan, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter,
	Liang, Kan, Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel

On Wed,  8 May 2024 15:14:57 +0100
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:

> check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so
> that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing
> a static cross compile for arm64:
> 
>   $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \
>     EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat"
> 
>   util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops'
> 

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thanks!

> Fixes: 55442cc2f22d ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops")
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> index c0a492e65388..c9584563cd56 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> @@ -1215,6 +1215,34 @@ static int offset_from_dwarf_op(Dwarf_Op *op)
>  	}
>  	return -1;
>  }
> +
> +static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> +{
> +	/* The first op is checked separately */
> +	ops++;
> +	nops--;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> +	 * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> +	 * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> +	 * location.
> +	 */
> +	while (nops) {
> +		switch (ops->atom) {
> +		case DW_OP_stack_value:
> +		case DW_OP_deref_size:
> +		case DW_OP_deref:
> +		case DW_OP_piece:
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +		ops++;
> +		nops--;
> +	}
> +	return true;
> +}
>  #endif /* HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT || HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT */
>  
>  #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> @@ -1395,34 +1423,6 @@ static bool match_var_offset(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, struct find_var_data *data,
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> -{
> -	/* The first op is checked separately */
> -	ops++;
> -	nops--;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> -	 * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> -	 * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> -	 * location.
> -	 */
> -	while (nops) {
> -		switch (ops->atom) {
> -		case DW_OP_stack_value:
> -		case DW_OP_deref_size:
> -		case DW_OP_deref:
> -		case DW_OP_piece:
> -			break;
> -		default:
> -			return false;
> -		}
> -		ops++;
> -		nops--;
> -	}
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  /* Only checks direct child DIEs in the given scope. */
>  static int __die_find_var_reg_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *arg)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT
  2024-05-09  1:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
@ 2024-05-09 21:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2024-05-09 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masami Hiramatsu
  Cc: James Clark, linux-perf-users, leo.yan, Peter Zijlstra,
	Ingo Molnar, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Liang, Kan, linux-kernel

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:11:36AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Wed,  8 May 2024 15:14:57 +0100
> James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> > and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so
> > that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing
> > a static cross compile for arm64:
> > 
> >   $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \
> >     EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat"
> > 
> >   util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops'
> > 
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,

- Arnaldo
 
> > Fixes: 55442cc2f22d ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops")
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > index c0a492e65388..c9584563cd56 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > @@ -1215,6 +1215,34 @@ static int offset_from_dwarf_op(Dwarf_Op *op)
> >  	}
> >  	return -1;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> > +{
> > +	/* The first op is checked separately */
> > +	ops++;
> > +	nops--;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> > +	 * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> > +	 * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> > +	 * location.
> > +	 */
> > +	while (nops) {
> > +		switch (ops->atom) {
> > +		case DW_OP_stack_value:
> > +		case DW_OP_deref_size:
> > +		case DW_OP_deref:
> > +		case DW_OP_piece:
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> > +			return false;
> > +		}
> > +		ops++;
> > +		nops--;
> > +	}
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> >  #endif /* HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT || HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT */
> >  
> >  #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> > @@ -1395,34 +1423,6 @@ static bool match_var_offset(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, struct find_var_data *data,
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> > -{
> > -	/* The first op is checked separately */
> > -	ops++;
> > -	nops--;
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> > -	 * register and offset exactly.  Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> > -	 * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> > -	 * location.
> > -	 */
> > -	while (nops) {
> > -		switch (ops->atom) {
> > -		case DW_OP_stack_value:
> > -		case DW_OP_deref_size:
> > -		case DW_OP_deref:
> > -		case DW_OP_piece:
> > -			break;
> > -		default:
> > -			return false;
> > -		}
> > -		ops++;
> > -		nops--;
> > -	}
> > -	return true;
> > -}
> > -
> >  /* Only checks direct child DIEs in the given scope. */
> >  static int __die_find_var_reg_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *arg)
> >  {
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-09 21:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-08 14:14 [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT James Clark
2024-05-08 21:04 ` Ian Rogers
2024-05-08 21:10   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-05-09  1:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-05-09 21:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.