All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ci: stop installing "gcc-13" for osx-gcc
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 09:17:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zj8blb0QqC2zdOAC@framework> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510201348.GE1954863@coredump.intra.peff.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3224 bytes --]

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 04:13:48PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 09:00:04AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:25:44PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > I'd like to report that this let me get a successful CI run, but I'm
> > > running into the thing where osx jobs seem to randomly hang sometimes
> > > and hit the 6-hour timeout. But I did confirm that this lets us get to
> > > the actual build/test, and not barf while installing dependencies.
> > 
> > Yeah, this one is puzzling to me. We see the same thing on GitLab CI,
> > and until now I haven't yet figured out why that is.
> 
> Drat. I was hoping maybe it was a problem in GitHub CI and somebody else
> would eventually fix it. ;)
> 
> It feels like a deadlock somewhere, though whether it is in our code, or
> in our tests, or some system-ish issue with prove, perl, etc, I don't
> know. It would be nice to catch it in the act and see what the process
> tree looks like. I guess poking around in the test environment with
> tmate might work, though I don't know if there's a way to get tmate
> running simultaneously with the hung step (so you'd probably have to
> connect, kick off the "make test" manually and hope it hangs).

My hunch tells me that it's the Perforce tests -- after all, this is
where the jobs get stuck, too. In "lib-git-p4.sh" we already document
that p4d is known to crash at times, and overall the logic to spawn the
server is quite convoluted.

I did try to get more useful logs yesterday. But as usual, once you
_want_ to reproduce a failure like this is doesn't happen anymore.

> > > diff --git a/.github/workflows/main.yml b/.github/workflows/main.yml
> > > index 5f92a50271..13cc0fe807 100644
> > > --- a/.github/workflows/main.yml
> > > +++ b/.github/workflows/main.yml
> > > @@ -285,7 +285,6 @@ jobs:
> > >              pool: macos-13
> > >            - jobname: osx-gcc
> > >              cc: gcc-13
> > > -            cc_package: gcc-13
> > 
> > As far as I can see this means that we don't install GCC at all anymore
> > via Homebrew. Does this mean that we now rely on the GCC version that is
> > preinstalled by Homebrew? Won't this break every time that Homebrew
> > changes the default GCC version?
> >  
> > I may be missing the obvious.
> 
> Yes, we'll have to update to a different version when the runner image
> stops carrying gcc-13. But it's not based on homebrew's default.
> According to:
> 
>   https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/macos-13/20240506.1/images/macos/macos-13-Readme.md
> 
> the runner image contains gcc-11, gcc-12, and gcc-13. So presumably it
> would be a while before gcc-13 ages out and we have to bother bumping. I
> do agree it would be nice to just use the latest gcc in the image, but I
> don't think we can specify that here. I guess we could say "gcc-auto" or
> something, and then the actual shell code could poke around for it.

Ah, thanks for the explanation. I was worried that things might break at
arbitrary points in time. But if this is only containde to whenever we
upgrade the runner image, then I don't see this as much of a problem.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-11  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-09 16:22 [PATCH 0/3] un-breaking osx-gcc ci job Jeff King
2024-05-09 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] ci: drop mention of BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES variable Jeff King
2024-05-09 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] ci: avoid bare "gcc" for osx-gcc job Jeff King
2024-05-10  7:00   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-10 20:16     ` Jeff King
2024-05-10 20:32   ` Kyle Lippincott
2024-05-10 20:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-10 22:02     ` Jeff King
2024-05-10 22:47       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-11 17:21         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-16  7:19           ` Jeff King
2024-05-16  7:27             ` Jeff King
2024-05-16  9:54             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-17  8:19               ` Jeff King
2024-05-17  8:33                 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-17 16:59                 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23  9:10                   ` Jeff King
2024-05-23 15:35                     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-09 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] ci: stop installing "gcc-13" for osx-gcc Jeff King
2024-05-10  7:00   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-10 20:13     ` Jeff King
2024-05-11  7:17       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-05-16 12:36         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-17  8:11           ` Jeff King
2024-05-17  8:25             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-17 11:30               ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-26  6:34                 ` Philip
2024-05-26 19:23                   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-27  5:12                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-29  9:27                   ` Jeff King
2024-05-09 16:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] un-breaking osx-gcc ci job Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zj8blb0QqC2zdOAC@framework \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.